A Study of Liquid Certolizumab Pegol as Additional Medication to Methotrexate in the Treatment of Signs and Symptoms of Rheumatoid Arthritis and in Prevention of Joint Damage in Patients With Active Rheumatoid Arthritis

NCT ID: NCT00160602

Last Updated: 2020-12-01

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

PHASE3

Total Enrollment

590 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2005-06-30

Study Completion Date

2006-09-30

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

A 24 week study in which patients are given study medication and assessed for signs and symptoms of rheumatoid arthritis. X-rays are performed to assess the progress of joint damage during the study.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Rheumatoid Arthritis

Keywords

Explore important study keywords that can help with search, categorization, and topic discovery.

Rheumatoid Arthritis Certolizumab Pegol, Cimzia

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

DOUBLE

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Certolizumab Pegol

Intervention Type DRUG

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Patients must be at least 18 years old at the screening visit.
* Patients must have a diagnosis of adult-onset RA of at least six months duration but not longer than fifteen years as defined by the 1987 American College of Rheumatology classification criteria.
* Patients must have active RA disease as defined by:

* 9 tender joints at Screening and Baseline.
* 9 swollen joints at Screening and Baseline. and fulfilling 1 of the following 2 criteria during the screening period:
* 30 mm/hour ESR (Westergren), or CRP \>15 mg/L.
* Patients must have received treatment with MTX (with or without folic acid) for at least 6 months prior to the Baseline visit. The dose of MTX and route of administration must have been stable for at least 2 months prior to the baseline visit. The minimum stable dose of MTX allowed is 10 mg weekly.
* Patients must be willing to complete an X-ray of the hands and feet 24 weeks after randomization even if they are no longer receiving study treatment in the present study, provided they have not withdrawn their informed consent.

Exclusion Criteria

* Patients must not have a diagnosis of any other inflammatory arthritis (e.g., psoriatic arthritis or ankylosing spondylitis).
* Patients must not have a secondary, non-inflammatory type of arthritis (e.g. OA or fibromyalgia)
* Female patients who are breast feeding, pregnant, or plan to become pregnant during the trial or for three months following last dose of study drug.
* Patients with a history of tuberculosis or positive chest X-ray for tuberculosis or positive
* Patients at a high risk of infection (e.g. leg ulcers, indwelling urinary catheter and persistent or recurrent chest infections and patients who are permanently bed ridden or wheelchair bound).
* Patients with known human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) infection.
* Patients with an active malignancy of any type or a history of malignancy (except basal cell carcinoma of the skin that has been excised prior to study start).
* Patients with a current or recent history, as determined by the Investigator, of severe, progressive, and/or uncontrolled renal, hepatic, hematological, gastrointestinal, endocrine, pulmonary, cardiac, neurological, or cerebral disease which would interfere with the patient's participation in the trial.
* Patients with a history of, or suspected, demyelinating disease of the central nervous system (e.g. multiple sclerosis or optic neuritis).
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

UCB Pharma

INDUSTRY

Sponsor Role lead

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

UCB Clinical Trial Call Center

Role: STUDY_DIRECTOR

UCB Pharma

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Montgomery, Alabama, United States

Site Status

Sun City West, Arizona, United States

Site Status

Palm Desert, California, United States

Site Status

Pasadena, California, United States

Site Status

Santa Maria, California, United States

Site Status

Naples, Florida, United States

Site Status

Palm Harbor, Florida, United States

Site Status

South Miami, Florida, United States

Site Status

New Orleans, Louisiana, United States

Site Status

St Louis, Missouri, United States

Site Status

New Brunswick, New Jersey, United States

Site Status

Stratford, New Jersey, United States

Site Status

New York, New York, United States

Site Status

Rochester, New York, United States

Site Status

Canfield, Ohio, United States

Site Status

Wynnewood, Pennsylvania, United States

Site Status

San Antonio, Texas, United States

Site Status

Pleven, , Bulgaria

Site Status

Sofia, , Bulgaria

Site Status

Stara Zagora, , Bulgaria

Site Status

Santiago, , Chile

Site Status

Temuco, , Chile

Site Status

Rijeka, , Croatia

Site Status

Brno, , Czechia

Site Status

Hlučín, , Czechia

Site Status

Ostrava-Poruba, , Czechia

Site Status

Prague, , Czechia

Site Status

Sokolov, , Czechia

Site Status

UherskeHradiste, , Czechia

Site Status

Zlín, , Czechia

Site Status

Tallinn, , Estonia

Site Status

Afula, , Israel

Site Status

Ashkelon, , Israel

Site Status

Beer Yaakov, , Israel

Site Status

Haifa, , Israel

Site Status

Jerusalem, , Israel

Site Status

Ramat Gan, , Israel

Site Status

Rehovot, , Israel

Site Status

Daugavpils, , Latvia

Site Status

Riga, , Latvia

Site Status

Alytus, , Lithuania

Site Status

Kaunas, , Lithuania

Site Status

Klaipėda, , Lithuania

Site Status

Panevezys, , Lithuania

Site Status

Šiauliai, , Lithuania

Site Status

D. F., , Mexico

Site Status

Mexicalli, , Mexico

Site Status

México, , Mexico

Site Status

Monterrey, , Mexico

Site Status

Tijuana, , Mexico

Site Status

Bialystok, , Poland

Site Status

Elblag, , Poland

Site Status

Krakow, , Poland

Site Status

Lublin, , Poland

Site Status

Sopot, , Poland

Site Status

Torun, , Poland

Site Status

Moscow, , Russia

Site Status

Saint Petersburg, , Russia

Site Status

Yaroslavl, , Russia

Site Status

Belgrade, , Serbia

Site Status

Niška Banja, , Serbia

Site Status

Novi Sad, , Serbia

Site Status

Košice, , Slovakia

Site Status

Piešťany, , Slovakia

Site Status

Dnipro, , Ukraine

Site Status

Donetsk, , Ukraine

Site Status

Ivano-Frankivsk, , Ukraine

Site Status

Kiev, , Ukraine

Site Status

Simferopol, , Ukraine

Site Status

Zaporizhzhya, , Ukraine

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Serbia and Montenegro United States Bulgaria Chile Croatia Czechia Estonia Israel Latvia Lithuania Mexico Poland Russia Serbia Slovakia Ukraine

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Smolen J, Landewe RB, Mease P, Brzezicki J, Mason D, Luijtens K, van Vollenhoven RF, Kavanaugh A, Schiff M, Burmester GR, Strand V, Vencovsky J, van der Heijde D. Efficacy and safety of certolizumab pegol plus methotrexate in active rheumatoid arthritis: the RAPID 2 study. A randomised controlled trial. Ann Rheum Dis. 2009 Jun;68(6):797-804. doi: 10.1136/ard.2008.101659. Epub 2008 Nov 17.

Reference Type RESULT
PMID: 19015207 (View on PubMed)

Strand V, Smolen JS, van Vollenhoven RF, Mease P, Burmester GR, Hiepe F, Khanna D, Nikai E, Coteur G, Schiff M. Certolizumab pegol plus methotrexate provides broad relief from the burden of rheumatoid arthritis: analysis of patient-reported outcomes from the RAPID 2 trial. Ann Rheum Dis. 2011 Jun;70(6):996-1002. doi: 10.1136/ard.2010.143586. Epub 2011 Mar 17.

Reference Type RESULT
PMID: 21415050 (View on PubMed)

Hazes JM, Taylor P, Strand V, Purcaru O, Coteur G, Mease P. Physical function improvements and relief from fatigue and pain are associated with increased productivity at work and at home in rheumatoid arthritis patients treated with certolizumab pegol. Rheumatology (Oxford). 2010 Oct;49(10):1900-10. doi: 10.1093/rheumatology/keq109. Epub 2010 Jun 14.

Reference Type RESULT
PMID: 20547658 (View on PubMed)

Paul S, Marotte H, Kavanaugh A, Goupille P, Kvien TK, de Longueville M, Mulleman D, Sandborn WJ, Vande Casteele N. Exposure-Response Relationship of Certolizumab Pegol and Achievement of Low Disease Activity and Remission in Patients With Rheumatoid Arthritis. Clin Transl Sci. 2020 Jul;13(4):743-751. doi: 10.1111/cts.12760. Epub 2020 Apr 1.

Reference Type RESULT
PMID: 32100960 (View on PubMed)

Curtis JR, Winthrop K, O'Brien C, Ndlovu MN, de Longueville M, Haraoui B. Use of a baseline risk score to identify the risk of serious infectious events in patients with rheumatoid arthritis during certolizumab pegol treatment. Arthritis Res Ther. 2017 Dec 15;19(1):276. doi: 10.1186/s13075-017-1466-y.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 29246162 (View on PubMed)

Smolen JS, van Vollenhoven R, Kavanaugh A, Strand V, Vencovsky J, Schiff M, Landewe R, Haraoui B, Arendt C, Mountian I, Carter D, van der Heijde D. Certolizumab pegol plus methotrexate 5-year results from the rheumatoid arthritis prevention of structural damage (RAPID) 2 randomized controlled trial and long-term extension in rheumatoid arthritis patients. Arthritis Res Ther. 2015 Sep 10;17(1):245. doi: 10.1186/s13075-015-0767-2.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 26353833 (View on PubMed)

Combe B, Furst DE, Keystone EC, van der Heijde D, Luijtens K, Ionescu L, Goel N, Emery P. Certolizumab Pegol Efficacy Across Methotrexate Regimens: A Pre-Specified Analysis of Two Phase III Trials. Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken). 2016 Mar;68(3):299-307. doi: 10.1002/acr.22676.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 26238672 (View on PubMed)

Kavanaugh A, Smolen JS, Emery P, Purcaru O, Keystone E, Richard L, Strand V, van Vollenhoven RF. Effect of certolizumab pegol with methotrexate on home and work place productivity and social activities in patients with active rheumatoid arthritis. Arthritis Rheum. 2009 Nov 15;61(11):1592-600. doi: 10.1002/art.24828.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 19877104 (View on PubMed)

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

EudraCT Number: 2005-002326-63

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: secondary_id

C87050

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id