Study to Investigate the Safety and Efficacy of Tregalizumab in Subjects (MTX-IR) With Active Rheumatoid Arthritis

NCT ID: NCT01999192

Last Updated: 2017-08-24

Study Results

Results available

Outcome measurements, participant flow, baseline characteristics, and adverse events have been published for this study.

View full results

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

TERMINATED

Clinical Phase

PHASE2

Total Enrollment

321 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2013-10-31

Study Completion Date

2015-07-31

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

The purpose of this study is to determine the efficacy and safety of three different Tregalizumab doses in combination with Methotrexate (MTX) in subjects who have active rheumatoid arthritis and an inadequate response to MTX alone.

The overall study duration is 24 weeks followed by a 24 week extension phase.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

The planned clinical study 986 (TREAT 2b) is a 24-week study in patients with Active rheumatoid arthritis (RA) who have had an inadequate response to Methotrexate (MTX) alone. The main phase of this study is followed by a 24-week extension phase for subjects meeting the respective entry criteria. Patients will be randomized to one of three different Active treatment groups or Placebo. The primary efficacy variable is the proportion of subjects with an ACR20 response after 12 weeks of double blinded treatment with the study medication based on observed cases in the FAS.

At Week 12, all subjects who had a minimum improvement of at least 20% (from baseline) in their tender joint count (TJC) and swollen joint count (SJC) continued on the same treatment. Subjects who had not demonstrated an improvement of at least 20% of TJC and SJC were assessed as non-responders. Non-responders who received placebo were randomized to an active treatment dose in a blinded manner. Non-responders who received active treatment were rolled up to the next highest dose in a blinded manner, apart from those already on the highest dose. These subjects remained on the highest dose.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Rheumatoid Arthritis

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

QUADRUPLE

Participants Caregivers Investigators Outcome Assessors

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Dose Level 1 Tregalizumab

25mg Tregalizumab s.c. weekly

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Tregalizumab

Intervention Type DRUG

humanized anti-CD4 mAb

Dose Level 2 Tregalizumab

100mg Tregalizumab s.c. weekly

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Tregalizumab

Intervention Type DRUG

humanized anti-CD4 mAb

Dose Level 3 Tregalizumab

200mg Tregalizumab s.c. weekly

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Tregalizumab

Intervention Type DRUG

humanized anti-CD4 mAb

Placebo

Placebo s.c. weekly

Group Type PLACEBO_COMPARATOR

Placebo

Intervention Type DRUG

identical end formulation buffer

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Tregalizumab

humanized anti-CD4 mAb

Intervention Type DRUG

Placebo

identical end formulation buffer

Intervention Type DRUG

Other Intervention Names

Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.

BT061

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

1. Subject demonstrates active RA according to the 1987 American College of Rheumatology (ACR) or 2010 ACR/European League Against Rheumatism (EULAR) classification criteria for RA with functional class I-III for ≥6 months.
2. Subject receives oral or parenteral MTX treatment for ≥12 weeks (overall), with an unchanged mode of application and stable MTX dose of ≥15 mg per week (or ≥12.5 mg per week in case of MTX intolerance), but no more than the highest locally approved dose for RA, for ≥8 weeks prior to baseline. The dose of MTX is expected to remain stable throughout the study and may be adjusted only for safety reasons. If applicable, the dose of folic acid must be unchanged for ≥8 weeks prior to baseline.
3. Subject meets the following two criteria at both screening and baseline: - At least 6 swollen joints at 28-joint assessment. - At least 6 tender joints at 28-joint assessment.
4. Subject has an erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR) or C-reactive protein (CRP) above the upper limit of normal (ULN) at screening. These tests may be repeated once during the screening period at the discretion of the investigator.
5. Subject is ≥18 and ≤75 years of age.
6. Subject has a body mass index ≥18 and ≤35 kg/m².
7. Subject receives treatment with corticosteroids ≤10 mg prednisone equivalent, stable for at least 4 weeks prior to baseline and during the study, if applicable.
8. Subject receives treatment with non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs), stable for at least 2 weeks prior to baseline and during the study, if applicable.
9. Female subjects of childbearing potential: has both a negative serum pregnancy test at screening and a negative urine pregnancy test at baseline.
10. Subject is judged to be in good general health as determined by the investigator based upon the results of medical history, laboratory profile, physical examination, chest X-ray (within 3 months before screening date is acceptable), and 12-lead electrocardiogram (ECG).
11. Subject has a cluster of differentiation 4 (CD4) cell count of \> 400/µl at screening.

Exclusion Criteria

1. Subject has previous exposure to any systemic biologic therapy (e.g., etanercept, adalimumab, rituximab, abatacept, tocilizumab), to Janus kinase (JAK) or spleen tyrosine kinase (SYK) inhibitors, or to Tregalizumab. Previous treatment with an anti-TNF agent is allowed only, if all of the following criteria apply: - treatment was stopped for reasons other than lack of efficacy or adverse events (AEs) - treatment was stopped at least 12 weeks or five half-lives of the compound prior to baseline (whichever is longer), and - the treatment period did not exceed 6 weeks.
2. Subject received treatment with conventional disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drugs (DMARDs) apart from MTX in the 12 weeks prior to baseline, and for DMARD leflunomide in the 24 weeks prior to baseline (except where specific leflunomide wash-out procedures were completed, following applicable guidelines).
3. Subject has been treated with intra-articular or parenteral administration of corticosteroids in the 4 weeks prior to baseline. Inhaled corticosteroids for stable medical conditions are allowed.
4. Subject has undergone joint surgery in the 12 weeks prior to baseline (at joints to be assessed within the study) or has undergone major surgery (e.g., abdominal surgery) in the 8 weeks prior to baseline.
5. Subject has a history of acute inflammatory joint disease of an origin other than RA or subject has any other rheumatic disease other than RA (e.g., mixed connective tissue disease, seronegative spondylarthropathy, psoriatic arthritis, Reiter's syndrome, fibromyalgia, systemic lupus erythematosus or any arthritis with onset prior to age 17 years). However, subjects may have secondary Sjögren's syndrome.
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

75 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

AbbVie

INDUSTRY

Sponsor Role collaborator

Biotest

INDUSTRY

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Ronald van Vollenhoven, Prof. MD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Karolinska Universitetssjukhuset, Solna

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Study Site 07

Paradise Valley, Arizona, United States

Site Status

Study Site 01

Springfield, Illinois, United States

Site Status

Study Site 03

Lincoln, Nebraska, United States

Site Status

Study Site 02

Clifton, New Jersey, United States

Site Status

Study Site 04

North Charleston, South Carolina, United States

Site Status

Study Site 05

Jackson, Tennessee, United States

Site Status

Study Site 09

Houston, Texas, United States

Site Status

Study Site 10

Katy, Texas, United States

Site Status

Study Site 01

Plovdiv, , Bulgaria

Site Status

Study Site 06

Plovdiv, , Bulgaria

Site Status

Study Site 02

Sofia, , Bulgaria

Site Status

Study Site 04

Sofia, , Bulgaria

Site Status

Study Site 07

Sofia, , Bulgaria

Site Status

Study Site 05

Stara Zagora, , Bulgaria

Site Status

Study Site 03

Varna, , Bulgaria

Site Status

Study Site 02

Rimouski, Quebec, Canada

Site Status

Study Site 01

Saint-Jérôme, Quebec, Canada

Site Status

Study Site 03

Bruntál, , Czechia

Site Status

Study Site 05

Ostrava, , Czechia

Site Status

Study Site 01

Prague, , Czechia

Site Status

Study Site 04

Prague, , Czechia

Site Status

Study Site 08

Prague, , Czechia

Site Status

Study Site 09

Prague, , Czechia

Site Status

Study Site 02

Uherské Hradiště, , Czechia

Site Status

Study Site 07

Uherské Hradiště, , Czechia

Site Status

Study Site 06

Zlín, , Czechia

Site Status

Study Site 01

Tallinn, , Estonia

Site Status

Study Site 03

Berlin, , Germany

Site Status

Study Site 04

Frankfurt, , Germany

Site Status

Study Site 06

München, , Germany

Site Status

Study Site 02

Ratingen, , Germany

Site Status

Study Site 01

Zerbst, , Germany

Site Status

Study Site 03

Balatonfüred, , Hungary

Site Status

Study Site 02

Budapest, , Hungary

Site Status

Study Site 04

Budapest, , Hungary

Site Status

Study Site 05

Budapest, , Hungary

Site Status

Study Site 06

Gyula, , Hungary

Site Status

Study Site 01

Veszprém, , Hungary

Site Status

Study Site 01

Kaunas, , Lithuania

Site Status

Study Site 02

Vilnius, , Lithuania

Site Status

Study Site 06

León, Guanajuato, Mexico

Site Status

Study Site 05

Mexico City, Mexico City, Mexico

Site Status

Study Site 08

Mexico City, Mexico City, Mexico

Site Status

Study Site 02

Chihuahua City, , Mexico

Site Status

Study Site 03

Distrito Federal, , Mexico

Site Status

Study Site 08

Bialystok, , Poland

Site Status

Study Site 05

Bydgoszcz, , Poland

Site Status

Study Site 10

Elblag, , Poland

Site Status

Study Site 04

Gdynia, , Poland

Site Status

Study Site 02

Katowice, , Poland

Site Status

Study Site 03

Krakow, , Poland

Site Status

Study Site 06

Krakow, , Poland

Site Status

Study Site 09

Poznan, , Poland

Site Status

Study Site 01

Warsaw, , Poland

Site Status

Study Site 07

Warsaw, , Poland

Site Status

Study Site 08

Kemerovo, , Russia

Site Status

Study Site 11

Kemerovo, , Russia

Site Status

Study Site 04

Kursk, , Russia

Site Status

Study Site 03

Moscow, , Russia

Site Status

Study Site 07

Moscow, , Russia

Site Status

Study Site 10

Moscow, , Russia

Site Status

Study Site 05

Omsk, , Russia

Site Status

Study Site 09

Saratov, , Russia

Site Status

Study Site 06

Smolensk, , Russia

Site Status

Study Site 01

Tomsk, , Russia

Site Status

Study Site 02

Yaroslavl, , Russia

Site Status

Study Site 01

Belgrade, , Serbia

Site Status

Study Site 02

Belgrade, , Serbia

Site Status

Study Site 04

Belgrade, , Serbia

Site Status

Study Site 03

Niška Banja, , Serbia

Site Status

Study Site 03

Bratislava, , Slovakia

Site Status

Study Site 04

Kosice - Saca, , Slovakia

Site Status

Study Site 05

Lučenec, , Slovakia

Site Status

Study Site 02

Považská Bystrica, , Slovakia

Site Status

Study Site 01

Rimavská Sobota, , Slovakia

Site Status

Study Site 08

Donetsk, , Ukraine

Site Status

Study Site 01

Kharkiv, , Ukraine

Site Status

Study Site 02

Kharkiv, , Ukraine

Site Status

Study Site 03

Kyiv, , Ukraine

Site Status

Study Site 04

Kyiv, , Ukraine

Site Status

Study Site 05

Vinnytsia, , Ukraine

Site Status

Study Site 06

Vinnytsia, , Ukraine

Site Status

Study Site 07

Vinnytsia, , Ukraine

Site Status

Study Site 09

Zaporizhzhia, , Ukraine

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

United States Bulgaria Canada Czechia Estonia Germany Hungary Lithuania Mexico Poland Russia Serbia Slovakia Ukraine

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

van Vollenhoven RF, Keystone EC, Strand V, Pacheco-Tena C, Vencovsky J, Behrens F, Racewicz A, Zipp D, Rharbaoui F, Wolter R, Knierim L, Schmeidl R, Zhou X, Aigner S, Dalken B, Wartenberg-Demand A; TREAT2b study team. Efficacy and safety of tregalizumab in patients with rheumatoid arthritis and an inadequate response to methotrexate: results of a phase IIb, randomised, placebo-controlled trial. Ann Rheum Dis. 2018 Apr;77(4):495-499. doi: 10.1136/annrheumdis-2017-212478. Epub 2018 Jan 17.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 29343509 (View on PubMed)

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

2013-000114-38

Identifier Type: EUDRACT_NUMBER

Identifier Source: secondary_id

BT986

Identifier Type: OTHER

Identifier Source: secondary_id

986_TREAT 2b

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.