A Study of Tocilizumab and Methotrexate Treatment Strategies (Adding Tocilizumab to Methotrexate Versus Switching to Tocilizumab) in Patients With Active Rheumatoid Arthritis With Inadequate Response to Prior Methotrexate Treatment

NCT ID: NCT00810199

Last Updated: 2014-07-18

Study Results

Results available

Outcome measurements, participant flow, baseline characteristics, and adverse events have been published for this study.

View full results

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

PHASE3

Total Enrollment

556 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2009-03-31

Study Completion Date

2013-01-31

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

This 2 arm study will compare 2 treatment strategies based on tocilizumab in combination with methotrexate or placebo in patients with moderate to severe rheumatoid arthritis. Patients receiving methotrexate treatment will be randomized to receive either a) tocilizumab 8 mg intravenous (iv) every 4 weeks + methotrexate orally (po) weekly or b) tocilizumab 8 mg iv every 4 weeks + placebo po weekly. After the first 24 weeks of blinded treatment, treatment adjustments (increase or decrease of treatment intensity) may be introduced at intervals, based on response. The anticipated time on study treatment is up to 3 years, and the target sample size is approximately 470 patients.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Rheumatoid Arthritis

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

QUADRUPLE

Participants Caregivers Investigators Outcome Assessors

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Tocilizumab + Methotrexate

Tocilizumab 8 mg/kg (up to 800 mg) intravenous (IV) once every 4 weeks + weekly oral methotrexate continuing at the patient's pre-study dose for 24 weeks. Patients taking oral corticosteroids remained on their pre-study dose (up to 10 mg/day). Week 24 to Week 52 the dose of tocilizumab and methotrexate remained the same. Based on DAS28 assessments, corticosteroid dose was adjusted and disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (DMARDS) added. Week 52 to Week 104, based on the DAS28 assessment, treatment was adjusted to one of four protocol specified treatment regimens: Treatment tapering, Continued treatment, Treatment intensification or Maintenance treatment. After Week 100, patients who discontinued tocilizumab because of remission were retreated with the last effective dose of tocilizumab or blinded methotrexate if a flare occurred.

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

tocilizumab [RoActemra/Actemra]

Intervention Type DRUG

tocilizumab 8 mg IV every 4 weeks.

methotrexate

Intervention Type DRUG

Approximately 15-17 mg methotrexate capsule orally once a week.

Tocilizumab + Placebo

Tocilizumab 8 mg/kg (up to 800 mg) IV once every 4 weeks + weekly oral placebo to methotrexate continuing at the patient's pre-study dose for 24 weeks. Patients taking oral corticosteroids remained on their pre-study dose (up to 10 mg/day). Week 24 to Week 52 the dose of tocilizumab and placebo to methotrexate remained the same. Based on DAS28 assessments, corticosteroid dose was adjusted and disease-modifying antirheumatic drug (DMARDS) added. Week 52 to Week 104, based on the DAS28 assessment, treatment was adjusted to one of four protocol specified treatment regimens: Treatment tapering, Continued treatment, Treatment intensification or Maintenance treatment. After Week 100, patients who discontinued tocilizumab because of remission were retreated with the last effective dose of tocilizumab or blinded placebo to methotrexate if a flare occurred.

Group Type PLACEBO_COMPARATOR

tocilizumab [RoActemra/Actemra]

Intervention Type DRUG

tocilizumab 8 mg IV every 4 weeks.

placebo

Intervention Type DRUG

Placebo matching methotrexate capsule taken orally once a week.

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

tocilizumab [RoActemra/Actemra]

tocilizumab 8 mg IV every 4 weeks.

Intervention Type DRUG

methotrexate

Approximately 15-17 mg methotrexate capsule orally once a week.

Intervention Type DRUG

placebo

Placebo matching methotrexate capsule taken orally once a week.

Intervention Type DRUG

Other Intervention Names

Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.

RoActemra/Actemra

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* adult patients, ≥ 18 years of age;
* moderate to severe active rheumatoid arthritis (Disease Activity Score (DAS28) \> 4.4);
* inadequate response to methotrexate;
* on a stable dose of ≥ 15mg/week methotrexate for at least 6 weeks.

Exclusion Criteria

* prior treatment with a biologic;
* Rheumatoid arthritis (RA) functional class IV;
* known active current or history of recurrent bacterial, viral, fungal, mycobacterial or other infections;
* evidence of active malignant disease.
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Hoffmann-La Roche

INDUSTRY

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Clinical Trials

Role: STUDY_DIRECTOR

Hoffmann-La Roche

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Santa Monica, California, United States

Site Status

Upland, California, United States

Site Status

Whittier, California, United States

Site Status

Aventura, Florida, United States

Site Status

Naples, Florida, United States

Site Status

Orange Park, Florida, United States

Site Status

Plantation, Florida, United States

Site Status

Sarasota, Florida, United States

Site Status

South Miami, Florida, United States

Site Status

Tamarac, Florida, United States

Site Status

Eagan, Minnesota, United States

Site Status

Las Vegas, Nevada, United States

Site Status

Mayfield, Ohio, United States

Site Status

Middleburg Heights, Ohio, United States

Site Status

Oklahoma City, Oklahoma, United States

Site Status

West Reading, Pennsylvania, United States

Site Status

Greenville, South Carolina, United States

Site Status

Nashville, Tennessee, United States

Site Status

Houston, Texas, United States

Site Status

San Antonio, Texas, United States

Site Status

Spokane, Washington, United States

Site Status

Belo Horizonte, Minas Gerais, Brazil

Site Status

Porto Alegre, Rio Grande do Sul, Brazil

Site Status

São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil

Site Status

São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil

Site Status

São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil

Site Status

Rijeka, , Croatia

Site Status

Zagreb, , Croatia

Site Status

Frederiksberg, , Denmark

Site Status

Hellerup, , Denmark

Site Status

Køge, , Denmark

Site Status

Tallinn, , Estonia

Site Status

Tallinn, , Estonia

Site Status

Abbeville, , France

Site Status

Boulogne-Billancourt, , France

Site Status

Brest, , France

Site Status

Échirolles, , France

Site Status

Le Kremlin-Bicêtre, , France

Site Status

Le Mans, , France

Site Status

Marseille, , France

Site Status

Marseille, , France

Site Status

Monaco, , France

Site Status

Nantes, , France

Site Status

Nice, , France

Site Status

Paris, , France

Site Status

Paris, , France

Site Status

Pierre-Bénite, , France

Site Status

Vandœuvre-lès-Nancy, , France

Site Status

Aachen, , Germany

Site Status

Berlin, , Germany

Site Status

Berlin, , Germany

Site Status

Cologne, , Germany

Site Status

Dresden, , Germany

Site Status

Erlangen, , Germany

Site Status

Hamburg, , Germany

Site Status

Jena, , Germany

Site Status

München, , Germany

Site Status

Ratingen, , Germany

Site Status

Würzburg, , Germany

Site Status

Athens, , Greece

Site Status

Thessaloniki, , Greece

Site Status

Thessaloniki, , Greece

Site Status

Afula, , Israel

Site Status

Beersheba, , Israel

Site Status

Haifa, , Israel

Site Status

Haifa, , Israel

Site Status

Haifa, , Israel

Site Status

Kfar Saba, , Israel

Site Status

Ramat Gan, , Israel

Site Status

Rishon LeZiyyon, , Israel

Site Status

Tel Aviv, , Israel

Site Status

Ancona, , Italy

Site Status

Bari, , Italy

Site Status

Perugia, , Italy

Site Status

Prato, , Italy

Site Status

Roma, , Italy

Site Status

Bauska, , Latvia

Site Status

Daugavpils, , Latvia

Site Status

Liepāja, , Latvia

Site Status

Riga, , Latvia

Site Status

Riga, , Latvia

Site Status

Riga, , Latvia

Site Status

Amsterdam, , Netherlands

Site Status

Amsterdam, , Netherlands

Site Status

Leiden, , Netherlands

Site Status

Maastricht, , Netherlands

Site Status

Nijmegen, , Netherlands

Site Status

Utrecht, , Netherlands

Site Status

Drammen, , Norway

Site Status

Gjettum, , Norway

Site Status

Kristiansand, , Norway

Site Status

Lillehammer, , Norway

Site Status

Moss, , Norway

Site Status

Oslo, , Norway

Site Status

Bucharest, , Romania

Site Status

Bucharest, , Romania

Site Status

Barnaul, , Russia

Site Status

Irkutsk, , Russia

Site Status

Izhevsk, , Russia

Site Status

Kazan', , Russia

Site Status

Khanty-Mansiysk, , Russia

Site Status

Kursk, , Russia

Site Status

Moscow, , Russia

Site Status

Novosibirsk, , Russia

Site Status

Novosibirsk, , Russia

Site Status

Saint Petersburg, , Russia

Site Status

Tyumen, , Russia

Site Status

Ufa, , Russia

Site Status

Ulyanovsk, , Russia

Site Status

Vladivostok, , Russia

Site Status

Yekaterinburg, , Russia

Site Status

Belgrade, , Serbia

Site Status

Kragujevac, , Serbia

Site Status

Niška Banja, , Serbia

Site Status

Nova Sad, , Serbia

Site Status

Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain

Site Status

A Coruña, La Coruña, Spain

Site Status

Santiago de Compostela, La Coruña, Spain

Site Status

Leganés, Madrid, Spain

Site Status

Madrid, Madrid, Spain

Site Status

Madrid, Madrid, Spain

Site Status

Madrid, Madrid, Spain

Site Status

Madrid, Madrid, Spain

Site Status

Oviedo, Principality of Asturias, Spain

Site Status

Seville, Sevilla, Spain

Site Status

Bilbao, Vizcaya, Spain

Site Status

Gothenburg, , Sweden

Site Status

Umeå, , Sweden

Site Status

Bangkok, , Thailand

Site Status

Khon Kaen, , Thailand

Site Status

Pathum Thani, , Thailand

Site Status

Cannock, , United Kingdom

Site Status

Glasgow, , United Kingdom

Site Status

Leeds, , United Kingdom

Site Status

London, , United Kingdom

Site Status

Newcastle upon Tyne, , United Kingdom

Site Status

Norwich, , United Kingdom

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

United States Brazil Croatia Denmark Estonia France Germany Greece Israel Italy Latvia Netherlands Norway Romania Russia Serbia Spain Sweden Thailand United Kingdom

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Dougados M, Kissel K, Sheeran T, Tak PP, Conaghan PG, Mola EM, Schett G, Amital H, Navarro-Sarabia F, Hou A, Bernasconi C, Huizinga TW. Adding tocilizumab or switching to tocilizumab monotherapy in methotrexate inadequate responders: 24-week symptomatic and structural results of a 2-year randomised controlled strategy trial in rheumatoid arthritis (ACT-RAY). Ann Rheum Dis. 2013 Jan;72(1):43-50. doi: 10.1136/annrheumdis-2011-201282. Epub 2012 May 5.

Reference Type RESULT
PMID: 22562983 (View on PubMed)

Dougados M, Kissel K, Conaghan PG, Mola EM, Schett G, Gerli R, Hansen MS, Amital H, Xavier RM, Troum O, Bernasconi C, Huizinga TW. Clinical, radiographic and immunogenic effects after 1 year of tocilizumab-based treatment strategies in rheumatoid arthritis: the ACT-RAY study. Ann Rheum Dis. 2014 May;73(5):803-9. doi: 10.1136/annrheumdis-2013-204761. Epub 2014 Jan 28.

Reference Type RESULT
PMID: 24473673 (View on PubMed)

Dougados M, Huizinga TW, Choy EH, Bingham CO 3rd, Aassi M, Bernasconi C. Evaluation of the Disease Activity Score in Twenty-Eight Joints-Based Flare Definitions in Rheumatoid Arthritis: Data From a Three-Year Clinical Trial. Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken). 2015 Dec;67(12):1762-6. doi: 10.1002/acr.22633.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 26037777 (View on PubMed)

Huizinga TW, Conaghan PG, Martin-Mola E, Schett G, Amital H, Xavier RM, Troum O, Aassi M, Bernasconi C, Dougados M. Clinical and radiographic outcomes at 2 years and the effect of tocilizumab discontinuation following sustained remission in the second and third year of the ACT-RAY study. Ann Rheum Dis. 2015 Jan;74(1):35-43. doi: 10.1136/annrheumdis-2014-205752. Epub 2014 Aug 28.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 25169728 (View on PubMed)

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

2008-001847-20

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: secondary_id

MA21488

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.