A Multi-center, Randomized, Double-blind, Placebo-controlled Study to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of Certolizumab Pegol in Combination With Methotrexate in the Treatment of Disease Modifying Antirheumatic Drugs (DMARD)-naïve Adults With Early Active Rheumatoid Arthritis

NCT ID: NCT01519791

Last Updated: 2018-07-31

Study Results

Results available

Outcome measurements, participant flow, baseline characteristics, and adverse events have been published for this study.

View full results

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

PHASE3

Total Enrollment

880 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2012-01-31

Study Completion Date

2015-09-30

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

This study is intended to evaluate the efficacy and safety of Certolizumab Pegol (CZP) in combination with Methotrexate (MTX) for inducing and sustaining clinical response in the treatment of Disease Modifying Antirheumatic Drug (DMARD)-naïve adults with early active Rheumatoid Arthritis.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Rheumatoid Arthritis

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

DOUBLE

Participants Investigators

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Certolizumab Pegol + Methotrexate

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Certolizumab Pegol

Intervention Type BIOLOGICAL

Prefilled syringes containing an injectable volume of 1 ml of solution for injection CZP for single use at a dosage strength of 200 mg/ml.

Injections will be given subcutaneously. CZP 400 mg at Baseline, Week 2 and Week 4, followed by a maintenance dose of 200 mg every 2 Weeks until Week 50.

Methotrexate

Intervention Type BIOLOGICAL

The MTX treatment is to be initiated at a dose of 10 mg per Week (oral tablets at the strength of 2.5 mg/tablet). The MTX dosage should be escalated by 5 mg every 2 Weeks such that the maximum dosage of 25 mg per Week is achieved by Week 6 to Week 8. Patients who could not tolerate ≥ 15 mg/week MTX by Week 8 were withdrawn while the maximum tolerated dose per patient (optimized dose) was maintained to Week 52.

Placebo + Methotrexate

Group Type PLACEBO_COMPARATOR

Placebo

Intervention Type OTHER

2 syringes Placebo at Baseline, Week 2 and Week 4, followed by 1 syringe Placebo every 2 Weeks.

Methotrexate

Intervention Type BIOLOGICAL

The MTX treatment is to be initiated at a dose of 10 mg per Week (oral tablets at the strength of 2.5 mg/tablet). The MTX dosage should be escalated by 5 mg every 2 Weeks such that the maximum dosage of 25 mg per Week is achieved by Week 6 to Week 8. Patients who could not tolerate ≥ 15 mg/week MTX by Week 8 were withdrawn while the maximum tolerated dose per patient (optimized dose) was maintained to Week 52.

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Certolizumab Pegol

Prefilled syringes containing an injectable volume of 1 ml of solution for injection CZP for single use at a dosage strength of 200 mg/ml.

Injections will be given subcutaneously. CZP 400 mg at Baseline, Week 2 and Week 4, followed by a maintenance dose of 200 mg every 2 Weeks until Week 50.

Intervention Type BIOLOGICAL

Placebo

2 syringes Placebo at Baseline, Week 2 and Week 4, followed by 1 syringe Placebo every 2 Weeks.

Intervention Type OTHER

Methotrexate

The MTX treatment is to be initiated at a dose of 10 mg per Week (oral tablets at the strength of 2.5 mg/tablet). The MTX dosage should be escalated by 5 mg every 2 Weeks such that the maximum dosage of 25 mg per Week is achieved by Week 6 to Week 8. Patients who could not tolerate ≥ 15 mg/week MTX by Week 8 were withdrawn while the maximum tolerated dose per patient (optimized dose) was maintained to Week 52.

Intervention Type BIOLOGICAL

Other Intervention Names

Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.

Cimzia CZP MTX

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Subjects must have a time since diagnosis of adult-onset Rheumatoid Arthritis (RA) less than 1 year as defined by the 2010 ACR/EULAR classification criteria from Screening Visit
* Positive Rheumatoid Factor (RF) and/or positive anticyclic Citrullinated Peptide Antibody (anti-CCP)
* Active RA disease
* DMARD-naïve
* Subject is naïve to RA related biologics

Exclusion Criteria

* A diagnosis of any other inflammatory Arthritis
* History of infected joint prosthesis, or other significant infection and other serious medical condition
* Known Tuberculosis (TB) disease or high risk of acquiring TB infection
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

UCB Pharma SA

INDUSTRY

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

UCB Clinical Trial Call Center

Role: STUDY_DIRECTOR

+1 877 822 9493 (UCB)

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

209

Birmingham, Alabama, United States

Site Status

170

Huntsville, Alabama, United States

Site Status

180

Mobile, Alabama, United States

Site Status

247

Glendale, Arizona, United States

Site Status

165

Paradise Valley, Arizona, United States

Site Status

234

Paradise Valley, Arizona, United States

Site Status

243

Phoenix, Arizona, United States

Site Status

251

Tucson, Arizona, United States

Site Status

160

Covina, California, United States

Site Status

257

Hemet, California, United States

Site Status

159

Los Angeles, California, United States

Site Status

201

San Leandro, California, United States

Site Status

202

Upland, California, United States

Site Status

172

Whittier, California, United States

Site Status

190

Fort Lauderdale, Florida, United States

Site Status

196

Jupiter, Florida, United States

Site Status

238

Lake Mary, Florida, United States

Site Status

232

Miami, Florida, United States

Site Status

213

Naples, Florida, United States

Site Status

214

Ocala, Florida, United States

Site Status

237

Orange Park, Florida, United States

Site Status

255

Orlando, Florida, United States

Site Status

163

Palm Harbor, Florida, United States

Site Status

166

Plantation, Florida, United States

Site Status

192

Sarasota, Florida, United States

Site Status

200

Vero Beach, Florida, United States

Site Status

226

Coeur d'Alene, Idaho, United States

Site Status

244

Springfield, Illinois, United States

Site Status

224

South Bend, Indiana, United States

Site Status

215

Cedar Rapids, Iowa, United States

Site Status

191

Wichita, Kansas, United States

Site Status

210

Wichita, Kansas, United States

Site Status

177

Hagerstown, Maryland, United States

Site Status

199

Kalamazoo, Michigan, United States

Site Status

198

Eagan, Minnesota, United States

Site Status

203

Tupelo, Mississippi, United States

Site Status

179

St Louis, Missouri, United States

Site Status

181

Lincoln, Nebraska, United States

Site Status

256

Reno, Nevada, United States

Site Status

229

Lebanon, New Hampshire, United States

Site Status

228

Clifton, New Jersey, United States

Site Status

207

Albuquerque, New Mexico, United States

Site Status

176

Brooklyn, New York, United States

Site Status

242

Plainview, New York, United States

Site Status

227

Rochester, New York, United States

Site Status

236

Durham, North Carolina, United States

Site Status

245

Middleburg Heights, Ohio, United States

Site Status

241

Oklahoma City, Oklahoma, United States

Site Status

186

Portland, Oregon, United States

Site Status

195

Bethlehem, Pennsylvania, United States

Site Status

167

Duncansville, Pennsylvania, United States

Site Status

168

Wyomissing, Pennsylvania, United States

Site Status

189

Charleston, South Carolina, United States

Site Status

205

Columbia, South Carolina, United States

Site Status

204

Hendersonville, Tennessee, United States

Site Status

217

Allen, Texas, United States

Site Status

185

Amarillo, Texas, United States

Site Status

161

Austin, Texas, United States

Site Status

178

Corpus Christi, Texas, United States

Site Status

162

Dallas, Texas, United States

Site Status

184

Houston, Texas, United States

Site Status

206

Houston, Texas, United States

Site Status

223

Houston, Texas, United States

Site Status

158

Mesquite, Texas, United States

Site Status

175

Nassau Bay, Texas, United States

Site Status

249

Plano, Texas, United States

Site Status

197

San Antonio, Texas, United States

Site Status

233

Kennewick, Washington, United States

Site Status

183

Clarksburg, West Virginia, United States

Site Status

174

Glendale, Wisconsin, United States

Site Status

276

Buenos Aires, , Argentina

Site Status

284

Rosario, , Argentina

Site Status

279

San Juan, , Argentina

Site Status

291

San Miguel de Tucumán, , Argentina

Site Status

6

Coffs Harbour, New South Wales, Australia

Site Status

2

Herson, Queensland, Australia

Site Status

1

Maroochydore, Queensland, Australia

Site Status

8

Woodville South, South Australia, Australia

Site Status

5

Fitzroy, Victoria, Australia

Site Status

4

Geelong, Victoria, Australia

Site Status

3

Malvern, Victoria, Australia

Site Status

7

Perth, Western Australia, Australia

Site Status

50

Vienna, , Austria

Site Status

51

Brussels, , Belgium

Site Status

126

Gilly, , Belgium

Site Status

36

Kortrijk, , Belgium

Site Status

65

Yvoir, , Belgium

Site Status

240

Kelowna, British Columbia, Canada

Site Status

235

Hamilton, Ontario, Canada

Site Status

188

Montreal, Quebec, Canada

Site Status

194

Trois-Rivières, Quebec, Canada

Site Status

303

Barranquilla, , Colombia

Site Status

272

Bogotá, , Colombia

Site Status

293

Bogotá, , Colombia

Site Status

299

Bogotá, , Colombia

Site Status

297

Bucaramanga, , Colombia

Site Status

288

Chía, , Colombia

Site Status

271

Medellín, , Colombia

Site Status

298

Medellín, , Colombia

Site Status

108

Brno, , Czechia

Site Status

124

Bruntál, , Czechia

Site Status

38

Hradec Králové, , Czechia

Site Status

37

Prague, , Czechia

Site Status

16

Le Kremlin-Bicêtre, , France

Site Status

85

Le Mans, , France

Site Status

88

Montpellier, , France

Site Status

34

Orléans, , France

Site Status

79

Strasbourg, , France

Site Status

52

Bad Doberan, , Germany

Site Status

17

Bayreuth, , Germany

Site Status

113

Berlin, , Germany

Site Status

120

Berlin, , Germany

Site Status

89

Erfurt, , Germany

Site Status

70

Frankfurt, , Germany

Site Status

71

Hamburg, , Germany

Site Status

81

Hildesheim, , Germany

Site Status

127

Lingen, , Germany

Site Status

61

München, , Germany

Site Status

53

Planegg, , Germany

Site Status

132

Ratingen, , Germany

Site Status

49

Rendsburg, , Germany

Site Status

69

Rheine, , Germany

Site Status

114

Würzburg, , Germany

Site Status

59

Zerbst, , Germany

Site Status

18

Budapest, , Hungary

Site Status

21

Budapest, , Hungary

Site Status

86

Eger, , Hungary

Site Status

131

Szolnok, , Hungary

Site Status

110

Szombathely, , Hungary

Site Status

19

Veszprém, , Hungary

Site Status

33

Cork, , Ireland

Site Status

54

Dublin, , Ireland

Site Status

32

Limerick, , Ireland

Site Status

115

Ferrara, , Italy

Site Status

122

Milan, , Italy

Site Status

40

Reggio Emilia, , Italy

Site Status

72

Roma, , Italy

Site Status

41

Verona, , Italy

Site Status

281

Durango, , Mexico

Site Status

286

Guadalajara, , Mexico

Site Status

292

Mexico City, , Mexico

Site Status

302

Mérida, , Mexico

Site Status

280

Monterrey, , Mexico

Site Status

294

San Luis Potosí City, , Mexico

Site Status

78

Monaco, , Monaco

Site Status

42

Leiden, , Netherlands

Site Status

128

Bydgoszcz, , Poland

Site Status

67

Elblag, , Poland

Site Status

99

Krakow, , Poland

Site Status

92

Poznan, , Poland

Site Status

74

Torun, , Poland

Site Status

100

Warsaw, , Poland

Site Status

44

Wroclaw, , Poland

Site Status

58

Brasov, , Romania

Site Status

111

Bucharest, , Romania

Site Status

22

Bucharest, , Romania

Site Status

25

Bucharest, , Romania

Site Status

26

Bucharest, , Romania

Site Status

24

Iași, , Romania

Site Status

57

Lasi, , Romania

Site Status

93

A Coruña, , Spain

Site Status

47

Madrid, , Spain

Site Status

63

Santiago de Compostela, , Spain

Site Status

76

Gothenburg, , Sweden

Site Status

82

Huddinge, , Sweden

Site Status

106

Lund, , Sweden

Site Status

123

Malmo, , Sweden

Site Status

77

Stockholm, , Sweden

Site Status

75

Uppsala, , Sweden

Site Status

118

Fribourg, , Switzerland

Site Status

68

Sankt Gallen, , Switzerland

Site Status

125

Cannock, , United Kingdom

Site Status

105

Dudley, , United Kingdom

Site Status

56

Leeds, , United Kingdom

Site Status

121

London, , United Kingdom

Site Status

27

London, , United Kingdom

Site Status

80

Sheffield, , United Kingdom

Site Status

119

York, , United Kingdom

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

United States Argentina Australia Austria Belgium Canada Colombia Czechia France Germany Hungary Ireland Italy Mexico Monaco Netherlands Poland Romania Spain Sweden Switzerland United Kingdom

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Emery P, Bingham CO 3rd, Burmester GR, Bykerk VP, Furst DE, Mariette X, van der Heijde D, van Vollenhoven R, Arendt C, Mountian I, Purcaru O, Tatla D, VanLunen B, Weinblatt ME. Certolizumab pegol in combination with dose-optimised methotrexate in DMARD-naive patients with early, active rheumatoid arthritis with poor prognostic factors: 1-year results from C-EARLY, a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled phase III study. Ann Rheum Dis. 2017 Jan;76(1):96-104. doi: 10.1136/annrheumdis-2015-209057. Epub 2016 May 10.

Reference Type RESULT
PMID: 27165179 (View on PubMed)

Weinblatt ME, Bingham CO 3rd, Burmester GR, Bykerk VP, Furst DE, Mariette X, van der Heijde D, van Vollenhoven R, VanLunen B, Ecoffet C, Cioffi C, Emery P. A Phase III Study Evaluating Continuation, Tapering, and Withdrawal of Certolizumab Pegol After One Year of Therapy in Patients With Early Rheumatoid Arthritis. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2017 Oct;69(10):1937-1948. doi: 10.1002/art.40196. Epub 2017 Sep 12.

Reference Type RESULT
PMID: 28666080 (View on PubMed)

Related Links

Access external resources that provide additional context or updates about the study.

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

2011-001729-25

Identifier Type: EUDRACT_NUMBER

Identifier Source: secondary_id

RA0055 Period 1

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.