A Study to Evaluate the Effectiveness and Safety of a Fixed Dose Combination of Azilsartan Medoxomil and Chlorthalidone in Patients With High Blood Pressure Who do Not Achieve Target Blood Pressure Following Treatment With Azilsartan Medoxomil Alone

NCT ID: NCT01456169

Last Updated: 2014-04-23

Study Results

Results available

Outcome measurements, participant flow, baseline characteristics, and adverse events have been published for this study.

View full results

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

PHASE3

Total Enrollment

507 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2011-10-31

Study Completion Date

2013-01-31

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

The purpose of this study is to evaluate the efficacy and safety of the fixed dose combinations of azilsartan medoxomil plus chlorthalidone (40/12.5 and 40/25 mg), once daily, in participants with grades 2 or 3 essential hypertension who do not reach target blood pressure following treatment with 40 mg azilsartan medoxomil monotherapy after 4 weeks.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Eligible participants completed a 2-week single-blind run-in period (Days -42 to -29) prior to a Single-Blind Monotherapy Treatment Period (Day -28 to Day -1) where they received azilsartan medoxomil 40 mg. After the Single-Blind Monotherapy Treatment Period, those participants who achieved target blood pressure discontinued treatment and resumed standard of care management at the discretion of their treating physician, while those participants who did not achieve target blood pressure (defined as clinic systolic blood pressure ≥140 mmHg) were randomly assigned to 1 of 3 active treatment arms: azilsartan medoxomil 40 mg plus placebo, azilsartan medoxomil plus chlorthalidone 40/12.5 mg, or azilsartan medoxomil plus chlorthalidone 40/25 mg.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Essential Hypertension

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

QUADRUPLE

Participants Caregivers Investigators Outcome Assessors

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Azilsartan medoxomil 40 mg

Azilsartan medoxomil 40 mg and placebo to chlorthalidone combination tablets, orally, once daily for up to 8 weeks.

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Azilsartan medoxomil/placebo

Intervention Type DRUG

Azilsartan medoxomil and placebo to chlorthalidone combination tablets

Azilsartan medoxomil + chlorthalidone 40/12.5 mg

Azilsartan 40 mg and chlorthalidone 12.5 mg combination tablets, orally, once daily for up to 8 weeks.

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Azilsartan medoxomil - chlorthalidone

Intervention Type DRUG

Azilsartan medoxomil and chlorthalidone fixed dose combination tablets

Azilsartan medoxomil + chlorthalidone 40/25 mg

Azilsartan medoxomil 40 mg and chlorthalidone 25 mg combination tablets, orally, once daily for up to 8 weeks.

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Azilsartan medoxomil - chlorthalidone

Intervention Type DRUG

Azilsartan medoxomil and chlorthalidone fixed dose combination tablets

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Azilsartan medoxomil/placebo

Azilsartan medoxomil and placebo to chlorthalidone combination tablets

Intervention Type DRUG

Azilsartan medoxomil - chlorthalidone

Azilsartan medoxomil and chlorthalidone fixed dose combination tablets

Intervention Type DRUG

Other Intervention Names

Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.

TAK-491 EDARBI TAK-491CLD Edarbyclor

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

At Screening

1. The participant has grade 2-3 essential hypertension which is not adequately controlled, as defined by mean, trough, sitting, clinic systolic blood pressure (SBP):

* ≥160 to ≤180 mm Hg in participants who have not received any antihypertensive medication in the 14 days prior to Visit 1.
* ≥150 to ≤170 mm Hg in participants taking 1 antihypertensive medication at Visit 1.
* ≥140 to ≤160 mm Hg in participants taking 2 antihypertensive medications at Visit 1.
2. The participant has clinical laboratory test results (clinical chemistry, hematology, and complete urinalysis) within the reference range for the testing laboratory or the investigator does not consider the results to be clinically relevant for precluding entry in to the study in this hypertensive population.
3. The participant is willing to discontinue current antihypertensive medications.
4. In the opinion of the investigator, the participant is capable of understanding and complying with protocol requirements.
5. The participant or, when applicable, the participant's legally acceptable representative signs and dates a written, informed consent form and any required privacy authorization prior to the initiation of any study procedures.
6. Male or female adult, at least 18 years of age.
7. A female of childbearing potential who is sexually active with a nonsterilized male partner agrees to routinely use adequate contraception from signing of the informed consent through 30 days after the last study drug dose. NOTE: Women NOT of childbearing potential are defined as those who have been surgically sterilized (hysterectomy, bilateral oophorectomy, tubal ligation \[performed more than one 1 year prior to Screening\]) or who are postmenopausal (defined as at least 1 year since last regular menses).

Post-placebo run-in:
8. The participant must have a post-placebo run-in, 24-hour mean SBP by ambulatory blood pressure monitoring (ABPM) of 140-175 mm Hg inclusive, and a clinic SBP measurement of 160 to 190 mm Hg inclusive (determined by the mean of 3 sitting, trough, measurements on Day -29) to qualify for entry in to the 4 week single-blind TAK-491 40 mg monotherapy treatment period.

Post-4 week, single-blind TAK-491 40 mg monotherapy treatment:
9. The participant does not achieve target blood pressure (defined as clinic SBP ≥140 mm Hg as determined by the mean of 3 sitting, trough, measurements) following 4 weeks single-blind treatment with TAK-491 40 mg monotherapy at Day -1, prior to randomization to double-blind treatment.

Exclusion Criteria

At Screening

1. The participant has clinic diastolic blood pressure (DBP) \>110 mm Hg.
2. The participant's 3 SBP measurements differ by more than 15 mm Hg (confirmed by a second set of three measurements).
3. The participant has received any investigational compound within 30 days prior to Screening or is currently participating in another investigational study. NOTE: Participants participating in observational studies (per local definition) may enter Screening provided that the last intervention or invasive procedure was \>30 days prior to Visit 1.
4. The participant has been randomized/enrolled in a previous TAK-491 or TAK-491CLD study. NOTE: This criterion does not apply to participants who entered screening or placebo run-in in another TAK-491 or TAK-491CLD study but were not randomized/enrolled.
5. The participant is a study site employee or is in a dependent relationship with a study site employee who is involved in conduct of this study (e.g., spouse, parent, child, sibling) or may consent under duress.
6. The participant is currently treated with more than 2 antihypertensive medications.
7. The participant works a night (third) shift (defined as 11 PM \[2300\] to 7 AM \[0700\]).
8. The participant has an upper arm circumference \<24 cm or \>42 cm.
9. The participant has secondary hypertension of any etiology (e.g., renovascular disease, pheochromocytoma, Cushing's syndrome).
10. The participant has any history of myocardial infarction, heart failure, unstable angina, coronary artery bypass graft, percutaneous coronary intervention, hypertensive encephalopathy, cerebrovascular accident, persistent or permanent atrial fibrillation or transient ischemic attack.
11. The participant has clinically significant cardiac conduction defects (e.g., third-degree atrioventricular block, sick sinus syndrome).
12. The participant has hemodynamically significant left ventricular outflow obstruction due to aortic valvular disease or hypertrophic cardiomyopathy.
13. The participant has severe renal dysfunction or disease \[based on estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) \<30 mL/min/1.73m\^2 at screening\], prior renal transplantation or nephrotic syndrome (defined as a urinary albumin/creatinine ratio \>2000 mg/g at Screening).
14. Participant has known hemodynamically significant bilateral renal artery stenosis or unilateral disease in a single kidney.
15. The participant has a history of cancer that has not been in remission for at least 5 years prior to the first dose of single-blind TAK-491 monotherapy study drug. (This criterion does not apply to those participants with basal cell or Stage 1 squamous cell carcinoma of the skin).
16. The participant has poorly-controlled type 1 or 2 diabetes mellitus (hemoglobin A1c \[HbA1c\] \>8.5%) at Screening.
17. The participant has hypokalemia or hyperkalemia (defined as serum potassium outside of the normal reference range of the central laboratory) at Screening.
18. The participant has an alanine aminotransferase or aspartate aminotransferase level \>2.5 times the upper limit of normal, active liver disease, or jaundice at Screening.
19. The participant has any other known serious disease or condition that would compromise safety, might affect life expectancy, or make it difficult to successfully manage and follow the participant according to the protocol.
20. The participant has a history of hypersensitivity or allergies to angiotensin II receptor blockers (ARB) or thiazide-type diuretics or other sulfonamide-derived compounds.
21. The participant has a history of drug abuse (defined as any illicit drug use) or a history of alcohol abuse per local guidelines within the past 2 years.
22. The participant is required to take excluded medications at any point during the study.
23. If female, the participant is pregnant or lactating or intending to become pregnant before, during, or within 1 month after participating in this study; or intending to donate ova during such time period.

Post-placebo run-in period
24. The participant has a clinic SBP \>190 mm Hg and DBP \>115 mm Hg.
25. The participant is noncompliant (\<70% or \>130%) with study medication during the placebo run-in period.
26. The participant has a 24-hour mean eligibility ABPM reading of insufficient quality.

Post-single-blind TAK-491 40 mg treatment period
27. The participant has a clinic SBP \>180 mm Hg and DBP \>110 mm Hg.
28. The participant is noncompliant (\<70% or \>130%) with study medication during the TAK-491 40 mg single-blind treatment period.
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Takeda

INDUSTRY

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Medical Director, Clinical Science

Role: STUDY_DIRECTOR

Takeda

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Haskovo, , Bulgaria

Site Status

Pazardzhik, , Bulgaria

Site Status

Pleven, , Bulgaria

Site Status

Plovdiv, , Bulgaria

Site Status

Sofia, , Bulgaria

Site Status

Varna, , Bulgaria

Site Status

Veliko Tarnovo, , Bulgaria

Site Status

Paide, , Estonia

Site Status

Saku, , Estonia

Site Status

Tallinn, , Estonia

Site Status

Tartu, , Estonia

Site Status

Võru, , Estonia

Site Status

Labarthe-sur-Lèze, Haute Garonne, France

Site Status

Bourg-des-Comptes, Ille et Vilaine, France

Site Status

Tours, Indre et Loire, France

Site Status

Vourey, Isere, France

Site Status

Saint-Étienne-de-Montluc, Pays de la Loire Region, France

Site Status

Orthez, Pyrenees Atlantiques, France

Site Status

Karlsruhe, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany

Site Status

Bad Wörishofen, Bavaria, Germany

Site Status

Nuremberg, Bavaria, Germany

Site Status

Hamburg, City state of Hamburg, Germany

Site Status

Frankfurt am Main, Hesse, Germany

Site Status

Stuhr, Lower Saxony, Germany

Site Status

Essen, North Rhine-Westphalia, Germany

Site Status

Kamp-Lintfort, North Rhine-Westphalia, Germany

Site Status

Mainz, Rhineland-Palatinate, Germany

Site Status

Dresden, Saxony, Germany

Site Status

Budapest, , Hungary

Site Status

Debrecen, , Hungary

Site Status

Gyöngyös, , Hungary

Site Status

Gyula, , Hungary

Site Status

Mosonmagyaróvár, , Hungary

Site Status

Nyíregyháza, , Hungary

Site Status

Pécs, , Hungary

Site Status

Szikszó, , Hungary

Site Status

Torrette Di Ancona, Ancona, Italy

Site Status

Acquaviva delle Fonti, Bari, Italy

Site Status

Brescia, Brescia, Italy

Site Status

Ferrara, Ferrara, Italy

Site Status

L’Aquila, L'Aquila, Italy

Site Status

Milan, Milano, Italy

Site Status

Palermo, Palermo, Italy

Site Status

Pavia, Pavia, Italy

Site Status

Pisa, Pisa, Italy

Site Status

Roma, Roma, Italy

Site Status

Sassari, Sassari, Italy

Site Status

Legnago, Verona, Italy

Site Status

Bologna, , Italy

Site Status

Alytus, , Lithuania

Site Status

Kaunas, , Lithuania

Site Status

Beek, , Netherlands

Site Status

Breda, , Netherlands

Site Status

Eindhoven, , Netherlands

Site Status

Groningen, , Netherlands

Site Status

Leiderdorp, , Netherlands

Site Status

Maastricht, , Netherlands

Site Status

Rotterdam, , Netherlands

Site Status

Velp, , Netherlands

Site Status

Zoetermeer, , Netherlands

Site Status

Zwijndrecht, , Netherlands

Site Status

Bydgoszcz, , Poland

Site Status

Gdansk, , Poland

Site Status

Gdynia, , Poland

Site Status

Krakow, , Poland

Site Status

Lodz, , Poland

Site Status

Lublin, , Poland

Site Status

Oświęcim, , Poland

Site Status

Parczew, , Poland

Site Status

Poznan, , Poland

Site Status

Pulway, , Poland

Site Status

Rzeszów, , Poland

Site Status

Sopot, , Poland

Site Status

Torun, , Poland

Site Status

Zgierz, , Poland

Site Status

Belgrade, , Serbia

Site Status

Kamenitz, , Serbia

Site Status

Kragujevac, , Serbia

Site Status

Kruševac, , Serbia

Site Status

Niš, , Serbia

Site Status

Zemun, , Serbia

Site Status

Bardejov, , Slovakia

Site Status

Bratislava, , Slovakia

Site Status

Galanta, , Slovakia

Site Status

Komárno, , Slovakia

Site Status

Košice, , Slovakia

Site Status

Lučenec, , Slovakia

Site Status

Martin, , Slovakia

Site Status

Nitra, , Slovakia

Site Status

Nové Zámky, , Slovakia

Site Status

Prešov, , Slovakia

Site Status

Svidník, , Slovakia

Site Status

Žilina, , Slovakia

Site Status

Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain

Site Status

Centelles, Barcelona, Spain

Site Status

Madrid, Madrid, Spain

Site Status

Málaga, Malaga, Spain

Site Status

Gothenburg, , Sweden

Site Status

Lund, , Sweden

Site Status

Malmo, , Sweden

Site Status

Vällingby, , Sweden

Site Status

London, Greater London, United Kingdom

Site Status

Glasgow, Lanarkshire, United Kingdom

Site Status

Blackpool, Lancashire, United Kingdom

Site Status

Northwood, Middlesex, United Kingdom

Site Status

Bath, Somerset, United Kingdom

Site Status

Royal Leamington Spa, Warwickshire, United Kingdom

Site Status

Westbury, Wiltshire, United Kingdom

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Bulgaria Estonia France Germany Hungary Italy Lithuania Netherlands Poland Serbia Slovakia Spain Sweden United Kingdom

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

2011-000220-16

Identifier Type: EUDRACT_NUMBER

Identifier Source: secondary_id

U1111-1119-4743

Identifier Type: REGISTRY

Identifier Source: secondary_id

11-028

Identifier Type: REGISTRY

Identifier Source: secondary_id

NL36272.072.11

Identifier Type: REGISTRY

Identifier Source: secondary_id

TAK-491CLD_307

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.