An Efficacy and Safety Study of Azilsartan Medoxomil Compared to Valsartan and Olmesartan in Participants With Essential Hypertension.

NCT ID: NCT00696436

Last Updated: 2011-04-19

Study Results

Results available

Outcome measurements, participant flow, baseline characteristics, and adverse events have been published for this study.

View full results

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

PHASE3

Total Enrollment

1291 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2008-04-30

Study Completion Date

2009-08-31

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

The purpose of this study is to evaluate the efficacy and safety of azilsartan medoxomil, once daily (QD), compared to placebo, valsartan and olmesartan in participants with essential hypertension.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Hypertension affects approximately 50 million individuals in the United States. As the population ages, the prevalence of hypertension will continue to increase if broad and effective preventive measures are not implemented. According to the World Health Organization, hypertension is the most common attributable cause of preventable death in developed nations, as uncontrolled hypertension greatly increases the risk of cardiovascular disease, cerebrovascular disease, and renal failure. Despite the availability of antihypertensive treatments, hypertension remains inadequately controlled: only about one-third of patients successfully maintain control.

A major component of blood pressure regulation is the renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system. This is a system of hormone-mediated feedback interactions that result in the relaxation or constriction of blood vessels in response to various stimuli. Angiotensin II, a polypeptide hormone, is formed from angiotensin I in a reaction catalyzed by angiotensin-converting enzyme as part of the renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system. Angiotensin II is the principal pressor agent of the renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system and has multiple effects on the cardiovascular system and on electrolyte homeostasis.

TAK-491 (azilsartan medoxomil) is an angiotensin II type 1 receptor antagonist currently being tested as a treatment for essential hypertension.

Study participation is anticipated to be about 10 weeks. Multiple procedures will occur at each visit which may include fasting, blood collection, urine collection, physical examinations, electrocardiograms and ambulatory blood pressure monitoring. Outside of the study center, participants will be required wear an ambulatory blood pressure monitoring device at 24 hour intervals.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Hypertension

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

QUADRUPLE

Participants Caregivers Investigators Outcome Assessors

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Azilsartan Medoxomil 40 mg QD

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Azilsartan medoxomil

Intervention Type DRUG

Azilsartan medoxomil 20 mg, tablets and matching placebo comparator orally once daily for two weeks.

Increased to azilsartan medoxomil 40 mg tablets and matching placebo comparator orally, once daily for up to four weeks.

Azilsartan Medoxomil 80 mg QD

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Azilsartan medoxomil

Intervention Type DRUG

Azilsartan medoxomil 40 mg, tablets and matching placebo comparator orally, once daily for two weeks.

Increased to Azilsartan medoxomil 80 mg, tablets and matching placebo comparator orally, once daily for up to four weeks.

Valsartan 320 mg QD

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Valsartan

Intervention Type DRUG

Valsartan 160 mg, tablets, and matching placebo comparator orally, once daily for two weeks.

Increased to Valsartan 320 mg, tablets, and matching placebo comparator, orally, once daily for up to four weeks.

Olmesartan 40 mg QD

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Olmesartan

Intervention Type DRUG

Olmesartan 20 mg, tablets and matching placebo comparator, orally, once daily for two weeks.

Increased to Olmesartan 40 mg, tablets and matching placebo comparator, orally, once daily for up to four weeks.

Placebo QD

Group Type PLACEBO_COMPARATOR

Placebo

Intervention Type DRUG

Matching placebo, orally, once daily for up to six weeks.

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Azilsartan medoxomil

Azilsartan medoxomil 20 mg, tablets and matching placebo comparator orally once daily for two weeks.

Increased to azilsartan medoxomil 40 mg tablets and matching placebo comparator orally, once daily for up to four weeks.

Intervention Type DRUG

Azilsartan medoxomil

Azilsartan medoxomil 40 mg, tablets and matching placebo comparator orally, once daily for two weeks.

Increased to Azilsartan medoxomil 80 mg, tablets and matching placebo comparator orally, once daily for up to four weeks.

Intervention Type DRUG

Valsartan

Valsartan 160 mg, tablets, and matching placebo comparator orally, once daily for two weeks.

Increased to Valsartan 320 mg, tablets, and matching placebo comparator, orally, once daily for up to four weeks.

Intervention Type DRUG

Olmesartan

Olmesartan 20 mg, tablets and matching placebo comparator, orally, once daily for two weeks.

Increased to Olmesartan 40 mg, tablets and matching placebo comparator, orally, once daily for up to four weeks.

Intervention Type DRUG

Placebo

Matching placebo, orally, once daily for up to six weeks.

Intervention Type DRUG

Other Intervention Names

Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.

TAK-491 Edarbi TAK-491 Edarbi Diovan® Benicar®

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

1. Essential hypertension (sitting systolic blood pressure between 150 and 180 mm Hg, inclusive, at Day -1 and 24-hour mean systolic blood pressure between 130 and 170 mm Hg, inclusive, at Day 1).
2. Capable of understanding and complying with protocol requirements.
3. Females of childbearing potential who are sexually active must agree to use adequate contraception, and can neither be pregnant nor lactating from Screening throughout the duration of the study
4. Clinical laboratory evaluations within the reference range for the testing laboratory or the results are deemed not clinically significant for inclusion into this study by the investigator.
5. Willing to discontinue current antihypertensive medications at Screening Day 21 visit. If the participant is on amlodipine prior to Screening, the participant is willing to discontinue this medication at Screening Day -28.

Exclusion Criteria

1. Sitting diastolic blood pressure greater than 114 mm Hg at Day -1 (day prior to Randomization).
2. Baseline 24-hour ambulatory blood pressure monitor reading of insufficient quality.
3. Taking or expected to take an excluded medication as described in the Excluded Medications.
4. Hypersensitive to angiotensin II receptor blockers.
5. History of myocardial infarction, heart failure, unstable angina, coronary artery bypass graft, percutaneous coronary intervention, hypertensive encephalopathy, cerebrovascular accident, or transient ischemic attack.
6. Clinically significant cardiac conduction defects.
7. Hemodynamically significant left ventricular outflow obstruction due to aortic valvular disease.
8. Secondary hypertension of any etiology.
9. Noncompliant (less than 70% or greater than 130%) with study medication during run-in period.
10. Moderate to severe renal dysfunction or disease.
11. Known or suspected unilateral or bilateral renal artery stenosis.
12. History of drug or alcohol abuse within the past 2 years.
13. Previous history of cancer that has not been in remission for at least 5 years prior to the first dose of study drug. (This criterion does not apply to those participants with basal cell or stage I squamous cell carcinoma of the skin).
14. Type 1 or poorly-controlled type 2 diabetes mellitus (glycosylate hemoglobin greater than 8.0%) at Screening.
15. Hyperkalemia as defined by the central laboratory normal reference range at Screening.
16. Alanine aminotransferase level of greater than 2.5 times the upper limit of normal, active liver disease, or jaundice at Screening.
17. Upper arm circumference less than 24 cm or greater than 42 cm.
18. Works night (3rd) shift (defined as 11 PM \[2300\] to 7 AM \[0700\]).
19. Unwilling or unable to comply with the protocol or scheduled appointments.
20. Currently is participating in another investigational study or has participated in an investigational study within 30 days prior to Randomization.
21. Any other serious disease or condition at Screening or Randomization that would compromise participant's safety, might affect life expectancy, or make it difficult to successfully manage and follow the subject according to the protocol.
22. Has been randomized in a previous azilsartan medoxomil study.
23. Is required to take or continues taking any disallowed medication, prescription medication, herbal treatment or over-the counter medication that may interfere with evaluation of the study medication.
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Takeda

INDUSTRY

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Takeda Global Research & Development Center, Inc.

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Executive Medical Director Clinical Science

Role: STUDY_DIRECTOR

Takeda

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Alabaster, Alabama, United States

Site Status

Ozark, Alabama, United States

Site Status

Green Valley, Arizona, United States

Site Status

Litchfield Park, Arizona, United States

Site Status

Mesa, Arizona, United States

Site Status

Tempe, Arizona, United States

Site Status

Carmichael, California, United States

Site Status

Chula Vista, California, United States

Site Status

Lincoln, California, United States

Site Status

Mission Viejo, California, United States

Site Status

National City, California, United States

Site Status

Pasadena, California, United States

Site Status

Riverside, California, United States

Site Status

Sacramento, California, United States

Site Status

San Diego, California, United States

Site Status

San Dimas, California, United States

Site Status

San Francisco, California, United States

Site Status

San Ramon, California, United States

Site Status

Santa Ana, California, United States

Site Status

Vista, California, United States

Site Status

Colorado Springs, Colorado, United States

Site Status

Denver, Colorado, United States

Site Status

Littleton, Colorado, United States

Site Status

Longmont, Colorado, United States

Site Status

Cape Coral, Florida, United States

Site Status

Clearwater, Florida, United States

Site Status

Largo, Florida, United States

Site Status

Miami, Florida, United States

Site Status

New Port Richey, Florida, United States

Site Status

New Smyrna Beach, Florida, United States

Site Status

Palm Harbor, Florida, United States

Site Status

Tallahassee, Florida, United States

Site Status

Dunwoody, Georgia, United States

Site Status

Roswell, Georgia, United States

Site Status

Arlington Heights, Illinois, United States

Site Status

Belleville, Illinois, United States

Site Status

Champaign, Illinois, United States

Site Status

Chicago, Illinois, United States

Site Status

Peoria, Illinois, United States

Site Status

Vernon Hills, Illinois, United States

Site Status

Evansville, Indiana, United States

Site Status

Indianapolis, Indiana, United States

Site Status

Terre Haute, Indiana, United States

Site Status

Kansas City, Kansas, United States

Site Status

Overland Park, Kansas, United States

Site Status

Shawnee, Kansas, United States

Site Status

Biddeford, Maine, United States

Site Status

Norwood, Maine, United States

Site Status

Baltimore, Maryland, United States

Site Status

Towson, Maryland, United States

Site Status

Brooklyn Center, Minnesota, United States

Site Status

Chesterfield, Missouri, United States

Site Status

Jefferson City, Missouri, United States

Site Status

Kansas City, Missouri, United States

Site Status

St Louis, Missouri, United States

Site Status

Billings, Montana, United States

Site Status

Las Vegas, Nevada, United States

Site Status

Margate City, New Jersey, United States

Site Status

Glens Falls, New York, United States

Site Status

Great Neck, New York, United States

Site Status

New Hyde Park, New York, United States

Site Status

New Windsor, New York, United States

Site Status

New York, New York, United States

Site Status

Charlotte, North Carolina, United States

Site Status

Raleigh, North Carolina, United States

Site Status

Columbus, Ohio, United States

Site Status

Norman, Oklahoma, United States

Site Status

Tulsa, Oklahoma, United States

Site Status

Yukon, Oklahoma, United States

Site Status

Ashland, Oregon, United States

Site Status

Eugene, Oregon, United States

Site Status

Medford, Oregon, United States

Site Status

Portland, Oregon, United States

Site Status

Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, United States

Site Status

Tipton, Pennsylvania, United States

Site Status

Charleston, South Carolina, United States

Site Status

Murrells Inlet, South Carolina, United States

Site Status

North Charleston, South Carolina, United States

Site Status

Cleveland, Tennessee, United States

Site Status

Bedford, Texas, United States

Site Status

Dallas, Texas, United States

Site Status

Houston, Texas, United States

Site Status

Missouri City, Texas, United States

Site Status

San Antonio, Texas, United States

Site Status

Sugarland, Texas, United States

Site Status

Tacoma, Washington, United States

Site Status

Carlos Paz, Córdoba Province, Argentina

Site Status

Córdoba, Córdoba Province, Argentina

Site Status

Guaymayen, Mendoza Province, Argentina

Site Status

Bahía Blanca, , Argentina

Site Status

Berazategui, , Argentina

Site Status

Buenos Aires, , Argentina

Site Status

Corrientes, , Argentina

Site Status

Haedo Pcia. de Buenos Aires, , Argentina

Site Status

La Plata, , Argentina

Site Status

Ramos Mejía Pcia. de Buenos Aires, , Argentina

Site Status

Rosario, , Argentina

Site Status

Salta, , Argentina

Site Status

San Miguel de Tucumán, , Argentina

Site Status

San Salvador de Jujuy, , Argentina

Site Status

Belo Horizonte, , Brazil

Site Status

Campinas, , Brazil

Site Status

Fortaleza, , Brazil

Site Status

Goiaenia, , Brazil

Site Status

Joildille, , Brazil

Site Status

Porto Alegre, , Brazil

Site Status

Rio Janeiro, , Brazil

Site Status

São Paulo, , Brazil

Site Status

Sorocava, , Brazil

Site Status

Aguascalientes, Aguascalientes, Mexico

Site Status

Chihuahua City, Chihuahua, Mexico

Site Status

Tijuana, Estado de Baja California, Mexico

Site Status

León, Guanajuato, Mexico

Site Status

Guadalajara, Jalapa, Mexico

Site Status

Monterrey, Nuevo León, Mexico

Site Status

San Luis Potosí City, San Luis Potosí, Mexico

Site Status

Xalapa, Veracruz, Mexico

Site Status

Mexico City, , Mexico

Site Status

Querètaro, , Mexico

Site Status

Arequipa, , Peru

Site Status

Cusco, , Peru

Site Status

Huaura, , Peru

Site Status

Ica, , Peru

Site Status

Lima, , Peru

Site Status

Trujillo, , Peru

Site Status

Aguas Buenas, , Puerto Rico

Site Status

Carolina, , Puerto Rico

Site Status

Jardines de Loiza, , Puerto Rico

Site Status

Orocovis, , Puerto Rico

Site Status

Ponce, , Puerto Rico

Site Status

San Juan, , Puerto Rico

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

United States Argentina Brazil Mexico Peru Puerto Rico

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

White WB, Weber MA, Sica D, Bakris GL, Perez A, Cao C, Kupfer S. Effects of the angiotensin receptor blocker azilsartan medoxomil versus olmesartan and valsartan on ambulatory and clinic blood pressure in patients with stages 1 and 2 hypertension. Hypertension. 2011 Mar;57(3):413-20. doi: 10.1161/HYPERTENSIONAHA.110.163402. Epub 2011 Jan 31.

Reference Type RESULT
PMID: 21282560 (View on PubMed)

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

U1111-1113-9161

Identifier Type: REGISTRY

Identifier Source: secondary_id

01-06-TL-491-019

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

Olmesartan in Essential Hypertension
NCT00185172 COMPLETED PHASE3