Efficacy and Safety of Azilsartan Medoxomil and Chlorthalidone in Participants With Moderate to Severe Hypertension

NCT ID: NCT00818883

Last Updated: 2012-02-07

Study Results

Results available

Outcome measurements, participant flow, baseline characteristics, and adverse events have been published for this study.

View full results

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

PHASE3

Total Enrollment

609 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2009-02-28

Study Completion Date

2009-11-30

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

The purpose of this study is to compare the antihypertensive effect of chlorthalidone vs hydrochlorothiazide when each is used with azilsartan medoxomil, once daily (QD), in participants with moderate to severe essential hypertension.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

According to the World Health Organization, hypertension is the most common attributable cause of preventable death in developed nations, as uncontrolled hypertension greatly increases the risk of cardiovascular disease, cerebrovascular disease, and renal failure. Despite the availability of antihypertensive agents, hypertension remains inadequately controlled; only about one-third of patients continue to maintain control successfully.

Although most antihypertensive agents are effective at the appropriate dose, the majority have side effects that limit their use. As a class, angiotensin II receptor blockers generally are considered more tolerable than other classes of antihypertensive agents. TAK-491 (azilsartan medoxomil) is an angiotensin II receptor blocker being evaluated by Takeda to treat essential hypertension.

Treatments for essential hypertension commonly include use of a thiazide-like diuretic, either alone or as part of combination treatment. Although chlorthalidone was commonly prescribed in the past, its use has widely been replaced with hydrochlorothiazide, presumably due to a lack of available combination products containing chlorthalidone, the assumption that hydrochlorothiazide and chlorthalidone have similar antihypertensive effects and cardiovascular benefits, and the perception that chlorthalidone use is associated with a greater frequency of hypokalemia. However, the frequency of hypokalemia with chlorthalidone use is relatively low in the dose range of 12.5 to 25 mg and these doses have been shown to be associated with potent blood pressure reduction. Several long-term outcomes trials have shown that blood pressure reductions associated with chlorthalidone treatment reduce risk of cardiovascular morbidity and mortality.

Most hypertensive patients require two or more agents to achieve target blood pressure and diuretics are commonly used in combination with other antihypertensive agents. This trial is designed to compare chlorthalidone and hydrochlorothiazide when coadministered with azilsartan medoxomil.

Participants in this study will receive either chlorthalidone or hydrochlorothiazide in combination with azilsartan medoxomil. Total commitment time for this study is about 13 weeks. Participants will be required to wear a blood pressure monitor for three 24 hours periods during the study.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Essential Hypertension

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

QUADRUPLE

Participants Caregivers Investigators Outcome Assessors

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Azilsartan Medoxomil 40 mg/Chlorthalidone 12.5 mg QD

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Azilsartan medoxomil and chlorthalidone

Intervention Type DRUG

Azilsartan medoxomil 40 mg and chlorthalidone 12.5 mg combination tablet, orally, once daily and hydrochlorothiazide placebo-matching tablets, orally, once daily for up to 10 weeks.

For participants who do not achieve target blood pressure by Week 6, the dose of chlorthalidone will be increased for the remaining 4 weeks of treatment.

Azilsartan Medoxomil 40 mg + Hydrochlorothiazide 12.5 mg QD

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Azilsartan medoxomil and hydrochlorothiazide

Intervention Type DRUG

Azilsartan medoxomil 40 mg, tablets, orally, once daily and hydrochlorothiazide 12.5 mg, tablets, orally, once daily for up to 10 weeks.

For participants who do not achieve target blood pressure by Week 6, the dose of hydrochlorothiazide will be increased for the remaining 4 weeks of treatment.

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Azilsartan medoxomil and chlorthalidone

Azilsartan medoxomil 40 mg and chlorthalidone 12.5 mg combination tablet, orally, once daily and hydrochlorothiazide placebo-matching tablets, orally, once daily for up to 10 weeks.

For participants who do not achieve target blood pressure by Week 6, the dose of chlorthalidone will be increased for the remaining 4 weeks of treatment.

Intervention Type DRUG

Azilsartan medoxomil and hydrochlorothiazide

Azilsartan medoxomil 40 mg, tablets, orally, once daily and hydrochlorothiazide 12.5 mg, tablets, orally, once daily for up to 10 weeks.

For participants who do not achieve target blood pressure by Week 6, the dose of hydrochlorothiazide will be increased for the remaining 4 weeks of treatment.

Intervention Type DRUG

Other Intervention Names

Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.

TAK-491 TAK-491CLD TAK-491 TAK-491CLD

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

1. Is treated with antihypertensive therapy and has a post-washout mean sitting clinic SBP greater than or equal to 160 and less than or equal to 190 mm Hg on Day -1; or the participant has not received antihypertensive treatment within 28 days prior to Screening and has a mean sitting clinic SBP greater than or equal to 160 and less than or equal to 190 mm Hg at the Screening Visit and on Day -1.
2. Females of childbearing potential who are sexually active agree to routinely use adequate contraception from Screening through 30 days after the last administered study drug dose.
3. Has clinical laboratory test results (clinical chemistry, hematology, and complete urinalysis) within the reference range for the testing laboratory or the investigator does not consider the results to be clinically significant.
4. Is willing to discontinue current antihypertensive medications on Day -21 or Day -28 if the participant is on amlodipine or chlorthalidone.

Exclusion Criteria

1. Has a mean sitting clinic diastolic blood pressure greater than 119 mm Hg on Day -1.
2. Has a baseline 24-hour ambulatory blood pressure monitoring reading of insufficient quality.
3. Works a night (third) shift (defined as 11 PM \[2300\] to 7 AM \[0700\]).
4. Has an upper arm circumference less than 24 cm or greater than 42 cm.
5. Is noncompliant (less than 70% or greater than 130%) with study medication during the placebo run-in period.
6. Has secondary hypertension of any etiology (eg, renovascular disease, pheochromocytoma, Cushing's syndrome).
7. Has a recent history (within the last 6 months) of myocardial infarction, heart failure, unstable angina, coronary artery bypass graft, percutaneous coronary intervention, hypertensive encephalopathy, cerebrovascular accident, or transient ischemic attack.
8. Has clinically significant cardiac conduction defects (ie, third-degree atrioventricular block, sick sinus syndrome, atrial fibrillation, or atrial flutter).
9. Has hemodynamically significant left ventricular outflow obstruction due to aortic valvular disease.
10. Has severe renal dysfunction or disease \[based on estimated glomerular filtration rate less than 30 mL/min/1.73m2 at Screening\].
11. Has known or suspected unilateral or bilateral renal artery stenosis.
12. Has a history of cancer that has not been in remission for at least 5 years prior to the first dose of study drug. (This criterion does not apply to those participants with basal cell or stage I squamous cell carcinoma of the skin).
13. Has poorly-controlled type 1 or type 2 diabetes mellitus at Screening.
14. Has hypokalemia or hyperkalemia (defined as serum potassium outside of the normal reference range of the central laboratory).
15. Has an alanine aminotransferase or aspartate aminotransferase level of greater than 2.5 times the upper limit of normal, active liver disease, or jaundice.
16. Has any other known serious disease or condition that would compromise safety, might affect life expectancy, or make it difficult to successfully manage and follow the participant according to the protocol.
17. Has known hypersensitivity to angiotensin II receptor blockers or thiazide-type diuretics or other sulfonamide-derived compounds.
18. Has been randomized in a previous azilsartan medoxomil study.
19. Currently participating in another investigational study or is receiving or has received any investigational compound within 30 days prior to Screening.
20. Has a history of drug abuse or a history of alcohol abuse within the past 2 years.
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Takeda

INDUSTRY

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Executive Medical Director

Role: STUDY_DIRECTOR

Takeda

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Birmingham, Alabama, United States

Site Status

Gulf Shores, Alabama, United States

Site Status

Scottsboro, Alabama, United States

Site Status

Gilbert, Arizona, United States

Site Status

Sierra Vista, Arizona, United States

Site Status

Paramount, California, United States

Site Status

Sacramento, California, United States

Site Status

San Diego, California, United States

Site Status

Colorado Springs, Colorado, United States

Site Status

Wheat Ridge, Colorado, United States

Site Status

Milford, Connecticut, United States

Site Status

Adventura, Florida, United States

Site Status

Aventura, Florida, United States

Site Status

Brooksville, Florida, United States

Site Status

Crystal River, Florida, United States

Site Status

DeLand, Florida, United States

Site Status

Doral, Florida, United States

Site Status

Miami, Florida, United States

Site Status

Naranja, Florida, United States

Site Status

Sarasota, Florida, United States

Site Status

Tampa, Florida, United States

Site Status

West Palm Beach, Florida, United States

Site Status

Winter Haven, Florida, United States

Site Status

Atlanta, Georgia, United States

Site Status

Stockbridge, Georgia, United States

Site Status

Suwanee, Georgia, United States

Site Status

Huntsville, Illinois, United States

Site Status

Bloomington, Indiana, United States

Site Status

Valparaiso, Indiana, United States

Site Status

Crestview Hills, Kentucky, United States

Site Status

Lexington, Kentucky, United States

Site Status

West Yarmouth, Massachusetts, United States

Site Status

Ann Arbor, Michigan, United States

Site Status

City of Saint Peters, Missouri, United States

Site Status

St Louis, Missouri, United States

Site Status

New Windsor, New York, United States

Site Status

Asheboro, North Carolina, United States

Site Status

Cincinnati, Ohio, United States

Site Status

Kettering, Ohio, United States

Site Status

Downingtown, Pennsylvania, United States

Site Status

Lancaster, Pennsylvania, United States

Site Status

Lansdale, Pennsylvania, United States

Site Status

Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, United States

Site Status

Goose Creek, South Carolina, United States

Site Status

Taylors, South Carolina, United States

Site Status

Bryan, Texas, United States

Site Status

San Antonio, Texas, United States

Site Status

Ettrick, Virginia, United States

Site Status

Seattle, Washington, United States

Site Status

Madison, Wisconsin, United States

Site Status

Moscow, , Russia

Site Status

Perm, , Russia

Site Status

Saint Petersburg, , Russia

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

United States Russia

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Bakris GL, Sica D, White WB, Cushman WC, Weber MA, Handley A, Song E, Kupfer S. Antihypertensive efficacy of hydrochlorothiazide vs chlorthalidone combined with azilsartan medoxomil. Am J Med. 2012 Dec;125(12):1229.e1-1229.e10. doi: 10.1016/j.amjmed.2012.05.023. Epub 2012 Aug 30.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 22939358 (View on PubMed)

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

U1111-1112-7119

Identifier Type: REGISTRY

Identifier Source: secondary_id

TAK-491CLD_306

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.