Efficacy and Safety of Azilsartan Medoxomil and Chlorthalidone in Participants With Moderate to Severe Hypertension
NCT ID: NCT00818883
Last Updated: 2012-02-07
Study Results
Outcome measurements, participant flow, baseline characteristics, and adverse events have been published for this study.
View full resultsBasic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
PHASE3
609 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2009-02-28
2009-11-30
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Efficacy and Safety of Azilsartan Medoxomil and Chlorthalidone Compared to Olmesartan Medoxomil and Hydrochlorothiazide in Participants With Moderate to Severe Hypertension.
NCT01033071
Efficacy and Safety of Azilsartan Medoxomil Co-Administered With Chlorthalidone in Participants With Essential Hypertension
NCT00591773
Efficacy and Safety of Azilsartan Medoxomil Combined With Chlorthalidone in Participants With Moderate to Severe Hypertension
NCT00847626
Safety and Tolerability of Azilsartan Medoxomil Plus Chlorthalidone Compared to Olmesartan Medoxomil Plus Hydrochlorothiazide in Participants With Essential Hypertension
NCT00996281
Efficacy and Safety of Azilsartan Medoxomil Plus Chlorthalidone in Participants With Moderate to Severe Hypertension
NCT00846365
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Although most antihypertensive agents are effective at the appropriate dose, the majority have side effects that limit their use. As a class, angiotensin II receptor blockers generally are considered more tolerable than other classes of antihypertensive agents. TAK-491 (azilsartan medoxomil) is an angiotensin II receptor blocker being evaluated by Takeda to treat essential hypertension.
Treatments for essential hypertension commonly include use of a thiazide-like diuretic, either alone or as part of combination treatment. Although chlorthalidone was commonly prescribed in the past, its use has widely been replaced with hydrochlorothiazide, presumably due to a lack of available combination products containing chlorthalidone, the assumption that hydrochlorothiazide and chlorthalidone have similar antihypertensive effects and cardiovascular benefits, and the perception that chlorthalidone use is associated with a greater frequency of hypokalemia. However, the frequency of hypokalemia with chlorthalidone use is relatively low in the dose range of 12.5 to 25 mg and these doses have been shown to be associated with potent blood pressure reduction. Several long-term outcomes trials have shown that blood pressure reductions associated with chlorthalidone treatment reduce risk of cardiovascular morbidity and mortality.
Most hypertensive patients require two or more agents to achieve target blood pressure and diuretics are commonly used in combination with other antihypertensive agents. This trial is designed to compare chlorthalidone and hydrochlorothiazide when coadministered with azilsartan medoxomil.
Participants in this study will receive either chlorthalidone or hydrochlorothiazide in combination with azilsartan medoxomil. Total commitment time for this study is about 13 weeks. Participants will be required to wear a blood pressure monitor for three 24 hours periods during the study.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
TREATMENT
QUADRUPLE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Azilsartan Medoxomil 40 mg/Chlorthalidone 12.5 mg QD
Azilsartan medoxomil and chlorthalidone
Azilsartan medoxomil 40 mg and chlorthalidone 12.5 mg combination tablet, orally, once daily and hydrochlorothiazide placebo-matching tablets, orally, once daily for up to 10 weeks.
For participants who do not achieve target blood pressure by Week 6, the dose of chlorthalidone will be increased for the remaining 4 weeks of treatment.
Azilsartan Medoxomil 40 mg + Hydrochlorothiazide 12.5 mg QD
Azilsartan medoxomil and hydrochlorothiazide
Azilsartan medoxomil 40 mg, tablets, orally, once daily and hydrochlorothiazide 12.5 mg, tablets, orally, once daily for up to 10 weeks.
For participants who do not achieve target blood pressure by Week 6, the dose of hydrochlorothiazide will be increased for the remaining 4 weeks of treatment.
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Azilsartan medoxomil and chlorthalidone
Azilsartan medoxomil 40 mg and chlorthalidone 12.5 mg combination tablet, orally, once daily and hydrochlorothiazide placebo-matching tablets, orally, once daily for up to 10 weeks.
For participants who do not achieve target blood pressure by Week 6, the dose of chlorthalidone will be increased for the remaining 4 weeks of treatment.
Azilsartan medoxomil and hydrochlorothiazide
Azilsartan medoxomil 40 mg, tablets, orally, once daily and hydrochlorothiazide 12.5 mg, tablets, orally, once daily for up to 10 weeks.
For participants who do not achieve target blood pressure by Week 6, the dose of hydrochlorothiazide will be increased for the remaining 4 weeks of treatment.
Other Intervention Names
Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
2. Females of childbearing potential who are sexually active agree to routinely use adequate contraception from Screening through 30 days after the last administered study drug dose.
3. Has clinical laboratory test results (clinical chemistry, hematology, and complete urinalysis) within the reference range for the testing laboratory or the investigator does not consider the results to be clinically significant.
4. Is willing to discontinue current antihypertensive medications on Day -21 or Day -28 if the participant is on amlodipine or chlorthalidone.
Exclusion Criteria
2. Has a baseline 24-hour ambulatory blood pressure monitoring reading of insufficient quality.
3. Works a night (third) shift (defined as 11 PM \[2300\] to 7 AM \[0700\]).
4. Has an upper arm circumference less than 24 cm or greater than 42 cm.
5. Is noncompliant (less than 70% or greater than 130%) with study medication during the placebo run-in period.
6. Has secondary hypertension of any etiology (eg, renovascular disease, pheochromocytoma, Cushing's syndrome).
7. Has a recent history (within the last 6 months) of myocardial infarction, heart failure, unstable angina, coronary artery bypass graft, percutaneous coronary intervention, hypertensive encephalopathy, cerebrovascular accident, or transient ischemic attack.
8. Has clinically significant cardiac conduction defects (ie, third-degree atrioventricular block, sick sinus syndrome, atrial fibrillation, or atrial flutter).
9. Has hemodynamically significant left ventricular outflow obstruction due to aortic valvular disease.
10. Has severe renal dysfunction or disease \[based on estimated glomerular filtration rate less than 30 mL/min/1.73m2 at Screening\].
11. Has known or suspected unilateral or bilateral renal artery stenosis.
12. Has a history of cancer that has not been in remission for at least 5 years prior to the first dose of study drug. (This criterion does not apply to those participants with basal cell or stage I squamous cell carcinoma of the skin).
13. Has poorly-controlled type 1 or type 2 diabetes mellitus at Screening.
14. Has hypokalemia or hyperkalemia (defined as serum potassium outside of the normal reference range of the central laboratory).
15. Has an alanine aminotransferase or aspartate aminotransferase level of greater than 2.5 times the upper limit of normal, active liver disease, or jaundice.
16. Has any other known serious disease or condition that would compromise safety, might affect life expectancy, or make it difficult to successfully manage and follow the participant according to the protocol.
17. Has known hypersensitivity to angiotensin II receptor blockers or thiazide-type diuretics or other sulfonamide-derived compounds.
18. Has been randomized in a previous azilsartan medoxomil study.
19. Currently participating in another investigational study or is receiving or has received any investigational compound within 30 days prior to Screening.
20. Has a history of drug abuse or a history of alcohol abuse within the past 2 years.
18 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Takeda
INDUSTRY
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Executive Medical Director
Role: STUDY_DIRECTOR
Takeda
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Birmingham, Alabama, United States
Gulf Shores, Alabama, United States
Scottsboro, Alabama, United States
Gilbert, Arizona, United States
Sierra Vista, Arizona, United States
Paramount, California, United States
Sacramento, California, United States
San Diego, California, United States
Colorado Springs, Colorado, United States
Wheat Ridge, Colorado, United States
Milford, Connecticut, United States
Adventura, Florida, United States
Aventura, Florida, United States
Brooksville, Florida, United States
Crystal River, Florida, United States
DeLand, Florida, United States
Doral, Florida, United States
Miami, Florida, United States
Naranja, Florida, United States
Sarasota, Florida, United States
Tampa, Florida, United States
West Palm Beach, Florida, United States
Winter Haven, Florida, United States
Atlanta, Georgia, United States
Stockbridge, Georgia, United States
Suwanee, Georgia, United States
Huntsville, Illinois, United States
Bloomington, Indiana, United States
Valparaiso, Indiana, United States
Crestview Hills, Kentucky, United States
Lexington, Kentucky, United States
West Yarmouth, Massachusetts, United States
Ann Arbor, Michigan, United States
City of Saint Peters, Missouri, United States
St Louis, Missouri, United States
New Windsor, New York, United States
Asheboro, North Carolina, United States
Cincinnati, Ohio, United States
Kettering, Ohio, United States
Downingtown, Pennsylvania, United States
Lancaster, Pennsylvania, United States
Lansdale, Pennsylvania, United States
Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, United States
Goose Creek, South Carolina, United States
Taylors, South Carolina, United States
Bryan, Texas, United States
San Antonio, Texas, United States
Ettrick, Virginia, United States
Seattle, Washington, United States
Madison, Wisconsin, United States
Moscow, , Russia
Perm, , Russia
Saint Petersburg, , Russia
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Bakris GL, Sica D, White WB, Cushman WC, Weber MA, Handley A, Song E, Kupfer S. Antihypertensive efficacy of hydrochlorothiazide vs chlorthalidone combined with azilsartan medoxomil. Am J Med. 2012 Dec;125(12):1229.e1-1229.e10. doi: 10.1016/j.amjmed.2012.05.023. Epub 2012 Aug 30.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
U1111-1112-7119
Identifier Type: REGISTRY
Identifier Source: secondary_id
TAK-491CLD_306
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.