Efficacy and Safety of Azilsartan Medoxomil Combined With Chlorthalidone in Participants With Moderate to Severe Hypertension

NCT ID: NCT00847626

Last Updated: 2012-02-07

Study Results

Results available

Outcome measurements, participant flow, baseline characteristics, and adverse events have been published for this study.

View full results

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

PHASE3

Total Enrollment

1711 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2009-01-31

Study Completion Date

2010-07-31

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

The purpose of this study is to determine the efficacy and safety of azilsartan medoxomil combined with chlorthalidone, once daily (QD), in participants with moderate to severe hypertension.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

According to the World Health Organization (WHO), hypertension is the most common attributable cause of preventable death in developed nations, as uncontrolled hypertension greatly increases the risk of cardiovascular disease, cerebrovascular disease, and renal failure. As the population ages, the prevalence of hypertension will continue to increase if broad and effective preventive measures are not implemented. Despite the availability of antihypertensive agents, hypertension remains inadequately controlled; only about one third of patients continue to maintain control successfully.

Although most antihypertensive agents are effective at the appropriate dose, the majority have side effects that limit their use. As a class, angiotensin II receptor blockers generally are considered more tolerable than other classes of antihypertensive agents. TAK-491 (azilsartan medoxomil) is an angiotensin II receptor blocker that is being evaluated by Takeda to treat essential hypertension.

Treatments for essential hypertension commonly include use of a thiazide-like diuretic, either alone or as part of combination treatment.

This study is designed to compare the antihypertensive effect and the safety and tolerability of the azilsartan medoxomil plus chlorthalidone fixed-dose combination product (TAK 491CLD FDC) with azilsartan monotherapy and chlorthalidone monotherapy during 8 weeks of treatment.

Participants in this study will be randomized to receive one of 11 possible dosing combinations of azilsartan medoxomil , chlorthalidone and placebo over an 8 week period. The total duration of the study will be approximately 13 weeks. Participants will make 12 visits to the clinic. Each participant will also be contacted by telephone 14 days after last dose of study drug for a follow-up assessment.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Hypertension

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

FACTORIAL

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

QUADRUPLE

Participants Caregivers Investigators Outcome Assessors

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Azilsartan medoxomil 20 mg/chlorthalidone 12.5 mg QD

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Azilsartan medoxomil and chlorthalidone

Intervention Type DRUG

Azilsartan medoxomil 20 mg and chlorthalidone 12.5 mg combination tablets, orally, once daily for up to 8 weeks

Azilsartan medoxomil 20 mg/chlorthalidone 25 mg QD

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Azilsartan medoxomil and chlorthalidone

Intervention Type DRUG

Azilsartan medoxomil 20 mg and chlorthalidone 25 mg combination tablets, orally, once daily for up to 8 weeks

Azilsartan medoxomil 40 mg/chlorthalidone 12.5 mg QD

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Azilsartan medoxomil and chlorthalidone

Intervention Type DRUG

Azilsartan 40 mg and chlorthalidone 12.5 mg combination tablets, orally, once daily for up to 8 weeks

Azilsartan medoxomil 40 mg/chlorthalidone 25 mg QD

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Azilsartan medoxomil and chlorthalidone

Intervention Type DRUG

Azilsartan medoxomil 40 mg and chlorthalidone 25 mg combination tablets, orally, once daily for up to 8 weeks

Azilsartan medoxomil 80 mg/chlorthalidone 12.5 mg QD

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Azilsartan medoxomil and chlorthalidone

Intervention Type DRUG

Azilsartan 80 mg and chlorthalidone 12.5 mg combination tablets, orally, once daily for up to 8 weeks

Azilsartan medoxomil 80 mg/chlorthalidone 25 mg QD

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Azilsartan medoxomil and chlorthalidone

Intervention Type DRUG

Azilsartan medoxomil 80 mg and chlorthalidone 25 mg combination tablets, orally, once daily for up to 8 weeks

Chlorthalidone 12.5 mg QD

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Chlorthalidone

Intervention Type DRUG

Azilsartan medoxomil placebo and chlorthalidone 12.5 mg combination tablets, orally, once daily for up to 8 weeks

Chlorthalidone 25 mg QD

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Chlorthalidone

Intervention Type DRUG

Azilsartan medoxomil placebo and chlorthalidone 25 mg combination tablets, orally, once daily for up to 8 weeks

Azilsartan medoxomil 20 mg QD

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Azilsartan medoxomil

Intervention Type DRUG

Azilsartan medoxomil 20 mg and chlorthalidone placebo combination tablets, orally, once daily for up to 8 weeks

Azilsartan medoxomil 40 mg QD

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Azilsartan medoxomil

Intervention Type DRUG

Azilsartan medoxomil 40 mg and chlorthalidone placebo combination tablets, orally, once daily for up to 8 weeks

Azilsartan medoxomil 80 mg QD

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Azilsartan medoxomil

Intervention Type DRUG

Azilsartan medoxomil 80 mg and chlorthalidone placebo combination tablets, orally, once daily for up to 8 weeks

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Azilsartan medoxomil and chlorthalidone

Azilsartan medoxomil 20 mg and chlorthalidone 12.5 mg combination tablets, orally, once daily for up to 8 weeks

Intervention Type DRUG

Azilsartan medoxomil and chlorthalidone

Azilsartan medoxomil 20 mg and chlorthalidone 25 mg combination tablets, orally, once daily for up to 8 weeks

Intervention Type DRUG

Azilsartan medoxomil and chlorthalidone

Azilsartan 40 mg and chlorthalidone 12.5 mg combination tablets, orally, once daily for up to 8 weeks

Intervention Type DRUG

Azilsartan medoxomil and chlorthalidone

Azilsartan medoxomil 40 mg and chlorthalidone 25 mg combination tablets, orally, once daily for up to 8 weeks

Intervention Type DRUG

Azilsartan medoxomil and chlorthalidone

Azilsartan 80 mg and chlorthalidone 12.5 mg combination tablets, orally, once daily for up to 8 weeks

Intervention Type DRUG

Azilsartan medoxomil and chlorthalidone

Azilsartan medoxomil 80 mg and chlorthalidone 25 mg combination tablets, orally, once daily for up to 8 weeks

Intervention Type DRUG

Chlorthalidone

Azilsartan medoxomil placebo and chlorthalidone 12.5 mg combination tablets, orally, once daily for up to 8 weeks

Intervention Type DRUG

Chlorthalidone

Azilsartan medoxomil placebo and chlorthalidone 25 mg combination tablets, orally, once daily for up to 8 weeks

Intervention Type DRUG

Azilsartan medoxomil

Azilsartan medoxomil 20 mg and chlorthalidone placebo combination tablets, orally, once daily for up to 8 weeks

Intervention Type DRUG

Azilsartan medoxomil

Azilsartan medoxomil 40 mg and chlorthalidone placebo combination tablets, orally, once daily for up to 8 weeks

Intervention Type DRUG

Azilsartan medoxomil

Azilsartan medoxomil 80 mg and chlorthalidone placebo combination tablets, orally, once daily for up to 8 weeks

Intervention Type DRUG

Other Intervention Names

Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.

TAK-491CLD TAK-491CLD TAK-491CLD TAK-491CLD TAK-491CLD TAK-491CLD TAK-491CLD TAK-491CLD TAK-491CLD

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

1. Is treated with antihypertensive therapy and has a post-washout mean sitting clinic systolic blood pressure greater than or equal to 160 and less than or equal to 190 mm Hg on the day prior to randomization, or the participant has not received antihypertensive treatment within 28 days prior to Screening and has a mean sitting clinic systolic blood pressure greater than or equal to 160 and less than or equal to 190 mm Hg at the Screening Visit and on the day prior to randomization.
2. Females of childbearing potential who are sexually active must agree to use adequate contraception, and can neither be pregnant nor lactating from Screening throughout the duration of the study.
3. Has clinical laboratory test results within the reference range for the testing laboratory or the investigator does not consider the results to be clinically significant.
4. Is willing to discontinue current antihypertensive medications on Day -21 or on Day -28 if on amlodipine or chlorthalidone.

Exclusion Criteria

1. Has a mean sitting clinic diastolic blood pressure greater than 119 mm Hg on the day prior to randomization.
2. Has a baseline 24-hour ambulatory blood pressure measurement reading of insufficient quality.
3. Has works a night (third) shift (defined as 11 PM \[2300\] to 7 AM \[0700\]).
4. Has an upper arm circumference less than 24 cm or greater than 42 cm.
5. Has is noncompliant with study medication during the placebo run-in period.
6. Has secondary hypertension of any etiology.
7. Has recent history of myocardial infarction, heart failure, unstable angina, coronary artery bypass graft, percutaneous coronary intervention, hypertensive encephalopathy, cerebrovascular accident, or transient ischemic attack.
8. Has clinically significant cardiac conduction defects.
9. Has hemodynamically significant left ventricular outflow obstruction due to aortic valvular disease.
10. Has severe renal dysfunction or disease.
11. Has known or suspected unilateral or bilateral renal artery stenosis.
12. Has a history of cancer that has not been in remission for at least 5 years prior to the first dose of study drug.
13. Has poorly controlled type 1 or type 2 diabetes mellitus at Screening.
14. Has hypokalemia or hyperkalemia.
15. Has an alanine aminotransferase or aspartate aminotransferase level of greater than 2.5 times the upper limit of normal, active liver disease, or jaundice.
16. Has any other known serious disease or condition that would compromise safety, might affect life expectancy, or make it difficult to successfully manage and follow Has according to the protocol.
17. Has known hypersensitivity to angiotensin II receptor blockers, thiazide-type diuretics or other sulfonamide-derived compounds.
18. Has been randomized in a previous azilsartan medoxomil study.
19. Is currently participating in another investigational study or is receiving or has received any investigational compound within 30 days prior to Screening.
20. Has a history of drug abuse or a history of alcohol abuse within the past 2 years.
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Takeda

INDUSTRY

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Executive Medical Director

Role: STUDY_DIRECTOR

Takeda

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Birmingham, Alabama, United States

Site Status

Columbiana, Alabama, United States

Site Status

Tuscaloosa, Alabama, United States

Site Status

Chandler, Arizona, United States

Site Status

Phoenix, Arizona, United States

Site Status

Scottsdale, Arizona, United States

Site Status

Tucson, Arizona, United States

Site Status

Little Rock, Arkansas, United States

Site Status

Buena Park, California, United States

Site Status

Carmichael, California, United States

Site Status

Costa Mesa, California, United States

Site Status

Irvine, California, United States

Site Status

Palm Springs, California, United States

Site Status

Riverside, California, United States

Site Status

Sacramento, California, United States

Site Status

San Diego, California, United States

Site Status

Vista, California, United States

Site Status

Walnut Creek, California, United States

Site Status

Middletown, Delaware, United States

Site Status

Bradenton, Florida, United States

Site Status

Deerfield Beach, Florida, United States

Site Status

Fort Lauderdale, Florida, United States

Site Status

Hallandale, Florida, United States

Site Status

Hialeah, Florida, United States

Site Status

Jacksonville, Florida, United States

Site Status

Longwood, Florida, United States

Site Status

Miami, Florida, United States

Site Status

Ocala, Florida, United States

Site Status

Ormond Beach, Florida, United States

Site Status

St. Petersburg, Florida, United States

Site Status

Atlanta, Georgia, United States

Site Status

Buffalo Grove, Illinois, United States

Site Status

Libertyville, Illinois, United States

Site Status

Melrose Park, Illinois, United States

Site Status

Fishers, Indiana, United States

Site Status

Indianapolis, Indiana, United States

Site Status

Erlanger, Kentucky, United States

Site Status

Madisonville, Kentucky, United States

Site Status

Paducah, Kentucky, United States

Site Status

Rockville, Maryland, United States

Site Status

Ann Arbor, Michigan, United States

Site Status

Chesterfield, Michigan, United States

Site Status

St Louis, Missouri, United States

Site Status

Omaha, Nebraska, United States

Site Status

Henderson, Nevada, United States

Site Status

Brick, New Jersey, United States

Site Status

Margate City, New Jersey, United States

Site Status

Albuquerque, New Mexico, United States

Site Status

Endwell, New York, United States

Site Status

Cary, North Carolina, United States

Site Status

Winston-Salem, North Carolina, United States

Site Status

Cincinnati, Ohio, United States

Site Status

Cleveland, Ohio, United States

Site Status

Columbus, Ohio, United States

Site Status

Dayton, Ohio, United States

Site Status

Lyndhurst, Ohio, United States

Site Status

Willoughby Hills, Ohio, United States

Site Status

Oklahoma City, Oklahoma, United States

Site Status

Ashland, Oregon, United States

Site Status

Altoona, Pennsylvania, United States

Site Status

Bensalem, Pennsylvania, United States

Site Status

Feasterville, Pennsylvania, United States

Site Status

Jenkintown, Pennsylvania, United States

Site Status

Sellersville, Pennsylvania, United States

Site Status

Warminster, Pennsylvania, United States

Site Status

Charleston, South Carolina, United States

Site Status

Florence, South Carolina, United States

Site Status

Murrells Inlet, South Carolina, United States

Site Status

Simpsonville, South Carolina, United States

Site Status

Spartanburg, South Carolina, United States

Site Status

Clarksville, Tennessee, United States

Site Status

New Tazewell, Tennessee, United States

Site Status

Austin, Texas, United States

Site Status

Bellaire, Texas, United States

Site Status

Dallas, Texas, United States

Site Status

Houston, Texas, United States

Site Status

McKinney, Texas, United States

Site Status

Richardson, Texas, United States

Site Status

San Antonio, Texas, United States

Site Status

Magna, Utah, United States

Site Status

West Jordan, Utah, United States

Site Status

Arlington, Virginia, United States

Site Status

Virginia Beach, Virginia, United States

Site Status

Oregon, Wisconsin, United States

Site Status

Santiago, , Chile

Site Status

Temuco, , Chile

Site Status

Aguascalientes, , Mexico

Site Status

Mexico City, , Mexico

Site Status

Mérida, , Mexico

Site Status

Bellavista, , Peru

Site Status

Chiclayo, , Peru

Site Status

Jesus Maria, , Peru

Site Status

Miraflores, , Peru

Site Status

San Borja, , Peru

Site Status

San Martín de Porres, , Peru

Site Status

Trujillo, , Peru

Site Status

Umacollo, , Peru

Site Status

Moscow, , Russia

Site Status

Saint Petersburg, , Russia

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

United States Chile Mexico Peru Russia

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

2008-004218-28

Identifier Type: EUDRACT_NUMBER

Identifier Source: secondary_id

U1111-1113-8735

Identifier Type: REGISTRY

Identifier Source: secondary_id

TAK-491CLD_302

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

NCT00892645

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: nct_alias

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.