Efficacy and Safety of Azilsartan Medoxomil and Chlorthalidone Compared to Olmesartan Medoxomil and Hydrochlorothiazide in Participants With Moderate to Severe Hypertension.

NCT ID: NCT01033071

Last Updated: 2012-02-07

Study Results

Results available

Outcome measurements, participant flow, baseline characteristics, and adverse events have been published for this study.

View full results

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

PHASE3

Total Enrollment

1071 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2010-01-31

Study Completion Date

2010-11-30

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

The purpose of this study is to compare the antihypertensive effect of azilsartan medoxomil plus chlorthalidone, once daily (QD), to olmesartan medoxomil plus hydrochlorothiazide in participants with moderate to severe hypertension.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

According to the World Health Organization, hypertension is the most common attributable cause of preventable death in developed nations, as uncontrolled hypertension greatly increases the risk of cardiovascular disease, cerebrovascular disease, and renal failure. As the population ages, the prevalence of hypertension will continue to increase if broad and effective preventive measures are not implemented. Despite the availability of antihypertensive agents, hypertension remains inadequately controlled; only about one third of patients continue to maintain control successfully.

Treatment algorithms for essential hypertension commonly include thiazides or thiazide-like diuretics, either alone or as part of combination treatment. Chlorthalidone is a commercially available, orally administered thiazide-type diuretic agent.

TAK-491 (azilsartan medoxomil) is an angiotensin II receptor blocker developed by Takeda to treat participants with essential hypertension.

This study will compare the safety and tolerability of azilsartan medoxomil plus chlorthalidone (TAK-491CLD) fixed-dose combination to olmesartan medoxomil plus hydrochlorothiazide fixed-dose combination.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Essential Hypertension

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

QUADRUPLE

Participants Caregivers Investigators Outcome Assessors

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Azilsartan Medoxomil 20-40mg/Chlorthalidone 12.5-25mg QD

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Azilsartan medoxomil and chlorthalidone

Intervention Type DRUG

Azilsartan medoxomil 20 mg and chlorthalidone 12.5 mg combination tablets, orally, once daily and olmesartan and hydrochlorothiazide placebo-matching tablets, orally, once daily for up to 4 weeks.

Participants will be force titrated at Week 4 to azilsartan medoxomil 40 mg and chlorthalidone 12.5 mg combination tablets, orally, once daily for the next 4 weeks.

Participants will then be force titrated at Week 8 to azilsartan medoxomil 40 mg and chlorthalidone 25 mg combination tablets, orally, once daily for the next 4 weeks.

Azilsartan Medoxomil 40-80mg/Chlorthalidone 12.5-25mg QD

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Azilsartan medoxomil and chlorthalidone

Intervention Type DRUG

Azilsartan medoxomil 40 mg and chlorthalidone 12.5 mg combination tablets, orally, once daily and olmesartan and hydrochlorothiazide placebo-matching tablets, orally, once daily for up to 4 weeks.

Participants will be force titrated at Week 4 to azilsartan medoxomil 80 mg and chlorthalidone 12.5 mg combination tablets, orally, once daily for the next 4 weeks.

Participants will then be force titrated at Week 8 to azilsartan medoxomil 80 mg and chlorthalidone 25 mg combination tablets, orally, once daily for the next 4 weeks.

Olmesartan Medoxomil 20-40mg/Hydrochlorothiazide 12.5-25mg QD

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Olmesartan medoxomil and hydrochlorothiazide

Intervention Type DRUG

Olmesartan medoxomil 20 mg and hydrochlorothiazide 12.5 mg combination tablets, orally, once daily and azilsartan medoxomil and chlorthalidone placebo-matching tablets, orally, once daily for up to 4 weeks.

Participants will be force titrated at Week 4 to olmesartan medoxomil 40 mg and hydrochlorothiazide 12.5 mg combination tablets, orally, once daily for the next 4 weeks.

Participants will then be force titrated at Week 8 to olmesartan medoxomil 40 mg and hydrochlorothiazide 25 mg combination tablets, orally, once daily for the next 4 weeks.

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Azilsartan medoxomil and chlorthalidone

Azilsartan medoxomil 20 mg and chlorthalidone 12.5 mg combination tablets, orally, once daily and olmesartan and hydrochlorothiazide placebo-matching tablets, orally, once daily for up to 4 weeks.

Participants will be force titrated at Week 4 to azilsartan medoxomil 40 mg and chlorthalidone 12.5 mg combination tablets, orally, once daily for the next 4 weeks.

Participants will then be force titrated at Week 8 to azilsartan medoxomil 40 mg and chlorthalidone 25 mg combination tablets, orally, once daily for the next 4 weeks.

Intervention Type DRUG

Azilsartan medoxomil and chlorthalidone

Azilsartan medoxomil 40 mg and chlorthalidone 12.5 mg combination tablets, orally, once daily and olmesartan and hydrochlorothiazide placebo-matching tablets, orally, once daily for up to 4 weeks.

Participants will be force titrated at Week 4 to azilsartan medoxomil 80 mg and chlorthalidone 12.5 mg combination tablets, orally, once daily for the next 4 weeks.

Participants will then be force titrated at Week 8 to azilsartan medoxomil 80 mg and chlorthalidone 25 mg combination tablets, orally, once daily for the next 4 weeks.

Intervention Type DRUG

Olmesartan medoxomil and hydrochlorothiazide

Olmesartan medoxomil 20 mg and hydrochlorothiazide 12.5 mg combination tablets, orally, once daily and azilsartan medoxomil and chlorthalidone placebo-matching tablets, orally, once daily for up to 4 weeks.

Participants will be force titrated at Week 4 to olmesartan medoxomil 40 mg and hydrochlorothiazide 12.5 mg combination tablets, orally, once daily for the next 4 weeks.

Participants will then be force titrated at Week 8 to olmesartan medoxomil 40 mg and hydrochlorothiazide 25 mg combination tablets, orally, once daily for the next 4 weeks.

Intervention Type DRUG

Other Intervention Names

Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.

azilsartan medoxomil plus chlorthalidone TAK-491CLD azilsartan medoxomil plus chlorthalidone TAK-491CLD Benicar HCT®

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

1. Has a mean sitting clinic systolic blood pressure greater than or equal to 160 and less than or equal to 190 mm Hg.
2. Females of childbearing potential who are sexually active agree to routinely use adequate contraception from Screening through 30 days after the last administered study drug dose.
3. Has clinical laboratory test results within the reference range for the testing laboratory or the investigator does not consider the results to be clinically significant.
4. Is willing to discontinue current antihypertensive medications on Day -21 or Day -28 if the participant is on amlodipine or chlorthalidone.

Exclusion Criteria

1. Has a mean sitting clinic diastolic blood pressure greater than 119 mm Hg on Day -1.
2. Has a baseline 24-hour ambulatory blood pressure monitoring reading of insufficient quality.
3. Works a night (third) shift.
4. Has an upper arm circumference less than 24 cm or greater than 42 cm.
5. Has secondary hypertension of any etiology.
6. Has a recent history of myocardial infarction, heart failure, unstable angina, coronary artery bypass graft, percutaneous coronary intervention, hypertensive encephalopathy, cerebrovascular accident, or transient ischemic attack.
7. Has clinically significant cardiac conduction defects.
8. Has hemodynamically significant left ventricular outflow obstruction due to aortic valvular disease.
9. Has severe renal dysfunction or disease.
10. Has known or suspected unilateral or bilateral renal artery stenosis.
11. Has a history of cancer that has not been in remission for at least 5 years prior to the first dose of study drug.
12. Has poorly-controlled diabetes mellitus at Screening.
13. Has hypokalemia or hyperkalemia.
14. Has an alanine aminotransferase or aspartate aminotransferase level of greater than 2.5 times the upper limit of normal, active liver disease, or jaundice.
15. Has any other known serious disease or condition that would compromise safety, might affect life expectancy, or make it difficult to successfully manage and follow the participant according to the protocol.
16. Has known hypersensitivity to angiotensin II receptor blockers or thiazide-type diuretics or other sulfonamide-derived compounds.
17. Has a history of drug abuse or a history of alcohol abuse within the past 2 years.
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Takeda

INDUSTRY

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Sr VP Clinical Science

Role: STUDY_DIRECTOR

Takeda

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Gulf Shores, Alabama, United States

Site Status

Litchfield Park, Arizona, United States

Site Status

Mesa, Arizona, United States

Site Status

Scottsdale, Arizona, United States

Site Status

Tucson, Arizona, United States

Site Status

Buena Park, California, United States

Site Status

Carmichael, California, United States

Site Status

Greenbrae, California, United States

Site Status

Irvine, California, United States

Site Status

Paramount, California, United States

Site Status

Sacramento, California, United States

Site Status

San Diego, California, United States

Site Status

San Francisco, California, United States

Site Status

Spring Valley, California, United States

Site Status

Wildomar, California, United States

Site Status

Colorado Springs, Colorado, United States

Site Status

Milford, Connecticut, United States

Site Status

Waterbury, Connecticut, United States

Site Status

Newark, Delaware, United States

Site Status

Aventura, Florida, United States

Site Status

Clearwater, Florida, United States

Site Status

DeLand, Florida, United States

Site Status

Fort Lauderdale, Florida, United States

Site Status

Miami, Florida, United States

Site Status

Ocala, Florida, United States

Site Status

Plant City, Florida, United States

Site Status

Tallahassee, Florida, United States

Site Status

Tampa, Florida, United States

Site Status

West Palm Beach, Florida, United States

Site Status

Winter Haven, Florida, United States

Site Status

Dunwoody, Georgia, United States

Site Status

Roswell, Georgia, United States

Site Status

Suwanee, Georgia, United States

Site Status

Chicago, Illinois, United States

Site Status

Melrose Park, Illinois, United States

Site Status

Naperville, Illinois, United States

Site Status

Avon, Indiana, United States

Site Status

Indianapolis, Indiana, United States

Site Status

Valparaiso, Indiana, United States

Site Status

Crestview Hills, Kentucky, United States

Site Status

Lexington, Kentucky, United States

Site Status

Auburn, Maine, United States

Site Status

Brockton, Massachusetts, United States

Site Status

Hyannis, Massachusetts, United States

Site Status

West Yarmouth, Massachusetts, United States

Site Status

Ann Arbor, Michigan, United States

Site Status

City of Saint Peters, Missouri, United States

Site Status

St Louis, Missouri, United States

Site Status

Henderson, Nevada, United States

Site Status

Margate City, New Jersey, United States

Site Status

Wildwood Crest, New Jersey, United States

Site Status

Albuquerque, New Mexico, United States

Site Status

Glens Falls, New York, United States

Site Status

Boiling Springs, North Carolina, United States

Site Status

Raleigh, North Carolina, United States

Site Status

Salisbury, North Carolina, United States

Site Status

Cincinnati, Ohio, United States

Site Status

Columbus, Ohio, United States

Site Status

Willoughby Hills, Ohio, United States

Site Status

Oklahoma City, Oklahoma, United States

Site Status

Yukon, Oklahoma, United States

Site Status

Ashland, Oregon, United States

Site Status

Portland, Oregon, United States

Site Status

Bensalem, Pennsylvania, United States

Site Status

Feasterville, Pennsylvania, United States

Site Status

Lansdale, Pennsylvania, United States

Site Status

Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, United States

Site Status

Reading, Pennsylvania, United States

Site Status

Tipton, Pennsylvania, United States

Site Status

Cranston, Rhode Island, United States

Site Status

Cumberland, Rhode Island, United States

Site Status

Mt. Pleasant, South Carolina, United States

Site Status

Simpsonville, South Carolina, United States

Site Status

Beaumont, Texas, United States

Site Status

Dallas, Texas, United States

Site Status

Houston, Texas, United States

Site Status

North Richland Hills, Texas, United States

Site Status

San Antonio, Texas, United States

Site Status

Magna, Utah, United States

Site Status

Manassas, Virginia, United States

Site Status

Lakewood, Washington, United States

Site Status

Port Orchard, Washington, United States

Site Status

Madison, Wisconsin, United States

Site Status

Menomonee Falls, Wisconsin, United States

Site Status

Abbotsford, British Columbia, Canada

Site Status

Powell River, British Columbia, Canada

Site Status

Mount Pearl, Newfoundland and Labrador, Canada

Site Status

Halifax, Nova Scotia, Canada

Site Status

London, Ontario, Canada

Site Status

Ottawa, Ontario, Canada

Site Status

Sarnia, Ontario, Canada

Site Status

Vaughan, Ontario, Canada

Site Status

Whitby, Ontario, Canada

Site Status

Woodstock, Ontario, Canada

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

United States Canada

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Cushman WC, Bakris GL, White WB, Weber MA, Sica D, Roberts A, Lloyd E, Kupfer S. Azilsartan medoxomil plus chlorthalidone reduces blood pressure more effectively than olmesartan plus hydrochlorothiazide in stage 2 systolic hypertension. Hypertension. 2012 Aug;60(2):310-8. doi: 10.1161/HYPERTENSIONAHA.111.188284. Epub 2012 Jun 18.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 22710649 (View on PubMed)

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

U1111-1112-4298

Identifier Type: REGISTRY

Identifier Source: secondary_id

TAK-491CLD_303

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.