Efficacy and Safety of Azilsartan Medoxomil in Participants With Essential Hypertension

NCT ID: NCT00696241

Last Updated: 2011-07-29

Study Results

Results available

Outcome measurements, participant flow, baseline characteristics, and adverse events have been published for this study.

View full results

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

PHASE3

Total Enrollment

1275 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2007-06-30

Study Completion Date

2008-10-31

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

The purpose of this study is to determine the safety and efficacy of azilsartan medoxomil, once daily (QD), compared to placebo and olmesartan in participants with essential hypertension.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Hypertension affects approximately 50 million individuals in the United States. As the population ages, the prevalence of hypertension will continue to increase if broad and effective preventive measures are not implemented. According to the World Health Organization, hypertension is the most common attributable cause of preventable death in developed nations, as uncontrolled hypertension greatly increases the risk of cardiovascular disease, cerebrovascular disease, and renal failure. Despite the availability of antihypertensive treatments, hypertension remains inadequately controlled; only about one-third of patients continue to maintain control successfully.

TAK-491 (azilsartan medoxomil) is an angiotensin II receptor blocker and this study is being conducted to evaluate the efficacy and safety of oral azilsartan medoxomil compared to placebo and olmesartan in subjects with essential hypertension.

Individuals who want to participate in this study will be required to provide written informed consent. Study participation is anticipated to be about 11 weeks. Multiple procedures will occur at each visit which may include fasting, blood collection, urine collection, vital signs including sitting blood pressure and pulse, body height and weight, physical examinations and electrocardiograms. Outside of the study center, participants will be required to wear an ambulatory blood pressure monitoring device at 24 hour intervals.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Hypertension

Keywords

Explore important study keywords that can help with search, categorization, and topic discovery.

Essential Hypertension Cardiovascular Disease High Blood Pressure Drug Therapy

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

QUADRUPLE

Participants Caregivers Investigators Outcome Assessors

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Azilsartan Medoxomil 20 mg QD

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Azilsartan medoxomil and olmesartan

Intervention Type DRUG

Azilsartan medoxomil 20 mg, tablets, azilsartan medoxomil 40 mg placebo-matching tablets, azilsartan medoxomil 80 mg placebo-matching tablets and olmesartan 40 mg placebo-matching tablets, orally, for up to 6 weeks.

Azilsartan Medoxomil 40 mg QD

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Azilsartan medoxomil and olmesartan

Intervention Type DRUG

Azilsartan medoxomil 40 mg, tablets, azilsartan medoxomil 20 mg placebo-matching tablets, azilsartan medoxomil 80 mg placebo-matching tablets and olmesartan 40 mg placebo-matching tablets, orally, for up to 6 weeks.

Azilsartan Medoxomil 80 mg QD

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Azilsartan medoxomil and olmesartan

Intervention Type DRUG

Azilsartan medoxomil 80 mg, tablets, azilsartan medoxomil 20 mg placebo-matching tablets, azilsartan medoxomil 40 mg placebo-matching tablets and olmesartan 40 mg placebo-matching tablets, orally, once daily for up to 6 weeks.

Olmesartan 40 mg QD

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Olmesartan

Intervention Type DRUG

Olmesartan 40 mg, tablets, azilsartan medoxomil 20 mg placebo-matching tablets, azilsartan medoxomil 40 mg placebo-matching tablets and azilsartan medoxomil 80 mg placebo-matching tablets, orally, once daily for up to 6 weeks.

Placebo QD

Group Type PLACEBO_COMPARATOR

Placebo

Intervention Type DRUG

Azilsartan medoxomil 20 mg placebo-matching tablets, azilsartan medoxomil 40 mg placebo-matching tablets, azilsartan medoxomil 80 mg placebo-matching tablets, and olmesartan 40 mg placebo- matching tablets, orally, once daily for up to 6 weeks.

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Azilsartan medoxomil and olmesartan

Azilsartan medoxomil 20 mg, tablets, azilsartan medoxomil 40 mg placebo-matching tablets, azilsartan medoxomil 80 mg placebo-matching tablets and olmesartan 40 mg placebo-matching tablets, orally, for up to 6 weeks.

Intervention Type DRUG

Azilsartan medoxomil and olmesartan

Azilsartan medoxomil 40 mg, tablets, azilsartan medoxomil 20 mg placebo-matching tablets, azilsartan medoxomil 80 mg placebo-matching tablets and olmesartan 40 mg placebo-matching tablets, orally, for up to 6 weeks.

Intervention Type DRUG

Azilsartan medoxomil and olmesartan

Azilsartan medoxomil 80 mg, tablets, azilsartan medoxomil 20 mg placebo-matching tablets, azilsartan medoxomil 40 mg placebo-matching tablets and olmesartan 40 mg placebo-matching tablets, orally, once daily for up to 6 weeks.

Intervention Type DRUG

Olmesartan

Olmesartan 40 mg, tablets, azilsartan medoxomil 20 mg placebo-matching tablets, azilsartan medoxomil 40 mg placebo-matching tablets and azilsartan medoxomil 80 mg placebo-matching tablets, orally, once daily for up to 6 weeks.

Intervention Type DRUG

Placebo

Azilsartan medoxomil 20 mg placebo-matching tablets, azilsartan medoxomil 40 mg placebo-matching tablets, azilsartan medoxomil 80 mg placebo-matching tablets, and olmesartan 40 mg placebo- matching tablets, orally, once daily for up to 6 weeks.

Intervention Type DRUG

Other Intervention Names

Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.

TAK-491 Edarbi TAK-491 Edarbi TAK-491 Edarbi Benicar®

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

1. Has essential hypertension (defined as sitting trough clinic systolic blood pressure between 150 and 180 mm Hg, inclusive at Day minus 1) and 24-hour mean systolic blood pressure greater than or equal to 130 mm Hg and less than or equal to 170 mm Hg at Day 1).
2. Females of childbearing potential who are sexually active must agree to use adequate contraception, and can neither be pregnant nor lactating from Screening throughout the duration of the study.
3. Clinical laboratory evaluations (including clinical chemistry, hematology, and complete urinalysis) within the reference range for the testing laboratory or the results are deemed not clinically significant for inclusion into this study by the investigator.
4. The subject is willing to discontinue current antihypertensive medications at the Screening Day minus 21 visit. If the subject is on amlodipine prior to screening, the subject is willing to discontinue this medication at Screening Day minus 28.

Exclusion Criteria

1. Sitting trough clinic diastolic blood pressure greater than 114 mm Hg at Day minus 1.
2. Baseline 24-hour ambulatory blood pressure monitor reading of insufficient quality.
3. History of myocardial infarction, heart failure, unstable angina, coronary artery bypass graft, percutaneous coronary intervention, hypertensive encephalopathy, cerebrovascular accident, or transient ischemic attack.
4. Clinically significant cardiac conduction defects (eg, third degree atrioventricular block, left bundle branch block, sick sinus syndrome, atrial fibrillation or atrial flutter).
5. Hemodynamically significant left ventricular outflow obstruction due to aortic valvular disease.
6. Secondary hypertension of any etiology.
7. Is noncompliant (less than 70% or greater than 130%) with study medication during Placebo Run-In Period.
8. Severe renal dysfunction or disease (based on calculated creatinine clearance less than 30 mL/min/1.73 m2) at Screening.
9. Known or suspected unilateral or bilateral renal artery stenosis.
10. History of drug abuse (defined as illicit drug use) or a history of alcohol abuse (defined as regular or daily consumption of more than 2 alcoholic drinks per day) within the past 2 years.
11. History of cancer that has not been in remission for at least 5 years prior to the first dose of study drug. (This criterion does not apply to those subjects with basal cell or stage I squamous cell carcinoma of the skin).
12. Type 1 or poorly controlled type 2 diabetes mellitus (glycosylated hemoglobin greater than 8.0%) at Screening.
13. Alanine aminotransferase level greater than 2.5 times the upper limit of normal, active liver disease, or jaundice at Screening.
14. Hyperkalemia (defined as serum potassium greater than the upper limit of normal per the central laboratory) at Screening.
15. Upper arm circumference less than 24 cm or greater than 42 cm.
16. Works night (3rd) shift (defined as 11 PM to 7 AM).
17. Currently participating in another investigational study or has participated in an investigational study within 30 days prior to Screening.
18. Any other serious disease or condition at Screening (or Randomization) that would compromise subject safety, might affect life expectancy, or make it difficult to successfully manage and follow the subject according to the protocol.
19. Randomized in a previous azilsartan medoxomil study.
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Takeda

INDUSTRY

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Takeda Global Research & Development Center, Inc.

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

VP Clinical Science Strategy

Role: STUDY_DIRECTOR

Takeda

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Birmingham, Alabama, United States

Site Status

Huntsville, Alabama, United States

Site Status

Mesa, Arizona, United States

Site Status

Phoenix, Arizona, United States

Site Status

Tempe, Arizona, United States

Site Status

Little Rock, Arkansas, United States

Site Status

Tempe, Arkansas, United States

Site Status

Beverly Hills, California, United States

Site Status

Carmichael, California, United States

Site Status

Fountain Valley, California, United States

Site Status

Long Beach, California, United States

Site Status

Los Gatos, California, United States

Site Status

Orangevale, California, United States

Site Status

Sacramento, California, United States

Site Status

Santa Ana, California, United States

Site Status

Spring Valley, California, United States

Site Status

Tustin, California, United States

Site Status

Westlake Village, California, United States

Site Status

Colorado Springs, Colorado, United States

Site Status

Farmington, Connecticut, United States

Site Status

Hollywood, Florida, United States

Site Status

Jacksonville, Florida, United States

Site Status

Jupiter, Florida, United States

Site Status

Melbourne, Florida, United States

Site Status

Miami, Florida, United States

Site Status

Naples, Florida, United States

Site Status

Ocala, Florida, United States

Site Status

Pembroke Pines, Florida, United States

Site Status

Sarasota, Florida, United States

Site Status

St. Petersburg, Florida, United States

Site Status

Augusta, Georgia, United States

Site Status

Lawrenceville, Georgia, United States

Site Status

Chicago, Illinois, United States

Site Status

Melrose Park, Illinois, United States

Site Status

Naperville, Illinois, United States

Site Status

Round Lake Beach, Illinois, United States

Site Status

Valparaiso, Indiana, United States

Site Status

Wichita, Kansas, United States

Site Status

Erlanger, Kentucky, United States

Site Status

Lexington, Kentucky, United States

Site Status

Auburn, Maine, United States

Site Status

West Yarmouth, Massachusetts, United States

Site Status

Benzonia, Michigan, United States

Site Status

Chelsea, Michigan, United States

Site Status

Omaha, Nebraska, United States

Site Status

Trenton, New Jersey, United States

Site Status

Wildwood Crest, New Jersey, United States

Site Status

Albuquerque, New Mexico, United States

Site Status

Brooklyn, New York, United States

Site Status

Orangevale, New York, United States

Site Status

Rochester, New York, United States

Site Status

Burlington, North Carolina, United States

Site Status

Charlotte, North Carolina, United States

Site Status

Raleigh, North Carolina, United States

Site Status

Salisbury, North Carolina, United States

Site Status

Statesville, North Carolina, United States

Site Status

Wilmington, North Carolina, United States

Site Status

Winston-Salem, North Carolina, United States

Site Status

Kettering, Ohio, United States

Site Status

Lyndhurst, Ohio, United States

Site Status

Marion, Ohio, United States

Site Status

Norman, Oklahoma, United States

Site Status

Oklahoma City, Oklahoma, United States

Site Status

Altoona, Pennsylvania, United States

Site Status

Reading, Pennsylvania, United States

Site Status

Mt. Pleasant, South Carolina, United States

Site Status

Simpsonville, South Carolina, United States

Site Status

Taylors, South Carolina, United States

Site Status

Nashville, Tennessee, United States

Site Status

New Tazewell, Tennessee, United States

Site Status

Dallas, Texas, United States

Site Status

Houston, Texas, United States

Site Status

Lake Jackson, Texas, United States

Site Status

North Richland Hills, Texas, United States

Site Status

San Antonio, Texas, United States

Site Status

Draper, Utah, United States

Site Status

Burke, Virginia, United States

Site Status

Norfolk, Virginia, United States

Site Status

Tacoma, Washington, United States

Site Status

Madison, Wisconsin, United States

Site Status

Provincia de Buenos Aires, , Argentina

Site Status

Provincia de Cordoba, , Argentina

Site Status

Aguascalientes, , Mexico

Site Status

Mexico City, , Mexico

Site Status

San Luis Potosí City, , Mexico

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

United States Argentina Mexico

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

White WB, Weber MA, Sica D, Bakris GL, Perez A, Cao C, Kupfer S. Effects of the angiotensin receptor blocker azilsartan medoxomil versus olmesartan and valsartan on ambulatory and clinic blood pressure in patients with stages 1 and 2 hypertension. Hypertension. 2011 Mar;57(3):413-20. doi: 10.1161/HYPERTENSIONAHA.110.163402. Epub 2011 Jan 31.

Reference Type RESULT
PMID: 21282560 (View on PubMed)

Bakris GL, Sica D, Weber M, White WB, Roberts A, Perez A, Cao C, Kupfer S. The comparative effects of azilsartan medoxomil and olmesartan on ambulatory and clinic blood pressure. J Clin Hypertens (Greenwich). 2011 Feb;13(2):81-8. doi: 10.1111/j.1751-7176.2010.00425.x.

Reference Type RESULT
PMID: 21272195 (View on PubMed)

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

U1111-1113-8905

Identifier Type: REGISTRY

Identifier Source: secondary_id

01-05-TL-491-008

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id