Seroma at the Donor Site of the TRAM Flap, With or Without Quilting Suture: A Comparative Study Using Ultrasound

NCT ID: NCT01358786

Last Updated: 2011-05-26

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

PHASE1

Total Enrollment

48 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2009-04-30

Study Completion Date

2010-10-31

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

Patient undergoing breast reconstruction with lower abdominal flap, benefit when points are used for membership (between the aponeurosis of the abdominal flap and underlying muscles) for closing the donor area, where there is reduced incidence of complications.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

This study evaluated seroma formation at the donor site of the TRAM patients who underwent breast reconstruction. Forty-eight breast reconstructions were performed using the bipedicled TRAM flap. The patients were randomly allocated into three groups of 16 participants each: DN group, use of suction drains but no quilting sutures between the remaining abdominal flap and musculoaponeurotic layer of the anterior abdominal wall; QS+DN group, use of quilting sutures and suction drains; and QS group, use of quilting sutures but no suction drains. In order to determine seroma formation, ultrasound examinations were performed on postoperative days 7 and 14 in 5 regions of the abdominal wall: epigastric, umbilical, hypogastric, right iliac, and left iliac regions.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Seroma

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

CROSSOVER

Primary Study Purpose

PREVENTION

Blinding Strategy

DOUBLE

Caregivers Outcome Assessors

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

no quilting sutures but drains

Group Type NO_INTERVENTION

quilting suture

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

* quilting sutures and drains
* quilting sutures but no drains

quilting sutures and drains

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

quilting suture

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

* quilting sutures and drains
* quilting sutures but no drains

quilting sutures but no drains

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

quilting suture

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

* quilting sutures and drains
* quilting sutures but no drains

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

quilting suture

* quilting sutures and drains
* quilting sutures but no drains

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Other Intervention Names

Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.

points

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* were age between 20 and 65 years
* body mass index (BMI) ≤ 30 kg/m2
* non-smokers.

Exclusion Criteria

* no skin excess in the infraumbilical region
* previous abdominoplasty
* uncontrolled systemic disease
* such as diabetes mellitus and arterial hypertension
* collagen diseases
* psychiatric disorders
* large weight loss
* and/or postoperative abdominal scars that could hinder flap vascularization.
Minimum Eligible Age

20 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

65 Years

Eligible Sex

FEMALE

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Federal University of São Paulo

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Luis Antonio Rossetto

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

luis Rossetto, MD

Role: STUDY_DIRECTOR

Graduate Program in Plastic Surgery, School of Medicine, Universidade Federal de São PaConception and design of the study, drafting the article, revising it critically for important intellectual content, and final approval of the version to be submitted.

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

1. Hartrampf CR, Jr, Scheflan M, Black PW. Breast reconstruction with a transverse abdominal island flap. Plast Reconstr Surg. 1982;69:216-225. 2. Andrades P, Prado A, Danilla S, et al. Progressive tension sutures in the prevention of postabdominoplasty seroma: a prospective, randomized, double-blind clinical trial. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2007;120:935-946. 3. Baroudi R, Ferreira CA. Contouring the hip and the abdomen. Clin Plast Surg. 1996;23:551-572. 4. Rossetto LA, Garcia EB, Abla LF, Neto MS, Ferreira LM. Quilting suture in the donor site of the transverse rectus abdominis musculocutaneous flap in breast reconstruction. Ann Plast Surg. 2009;62:240-243. %. Di Martino M, Nahas FX, Barbosa MV, et al. Seroma in lipoabdominoplasty and abdominoplasty: a comparative study using ultrasound. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2010;126:1742-1751.

Reference Type BACKGROUND

Rossetto LA, Garcia EB, Abla LE, Ferreira LM. Seroma and quilting suture at the donor site of the TRAM flap in breast reconstruction: a prospective randomized double-blind clinical trial. Ann Plast Surg. 2014 Apr;72(4):391-7. doi: 10.1097/SAP.0b013e3182610b11.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 23407260 (View on PubMed)

Related Links

Access external resources that provide additional context or updates about the study.

http://www.unifesp.br

Federal University of Saint Paul

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

CEP 1995/08

Identifier Type: OTHER

Identifier Source: secondary_id

CEP 1995 08

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.