Plication of the Rectus Abdominis in Two Planes and in One Continuous Suture Plan
NCT ID: NCT02674035
Last Updated: 2016-02-04
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
PHASE4
30 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2012-06-30
2014-06-30
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Evaluation of the Long-term Stability of Sheath Plication Using Absorbable Sutures in Patients With Diastasis of the Recti Muscles: an Ultrasonography Study
NCT01586559
Continuous Locked Non-barbed Suture for Mesh Fixation During Laparoscopic Ventral Rectopexy for Severe Rectal Prolapse
NCT05254860
Laparoscopic Transabdominal Cerclage: New Approach
NCT02457377
Abdominal Wall Reconstruction With PVDF Mesh in the Setting of Active Infection
NCT05061264
Insitu Repair Versus Uterine Exeriorization During Cesarean Section
NCT01723605
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Non-inclusion criteria were smoking habit; abdominal wall scar (except for a Pfannenstiel scar related to a Cesarean section); abdominal wall hérnias; history of deep-vein thrombosis; chronic obstructive pulmonary disease; câncer; hypertension; diabetes or other chronic systemic diseases; and use of corticosteroids. Patients lost to follow-up and those who did not undergo ultrasound examination were excluded from the study.
Primary outcome: Get a technique that provides a safe correction with lasting results and in every segment of time.
Secondary clinical outcome: confirms the plication of a single layer as positive in women patients at two years of surgery compared to two planes.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
FACTORIAL
TREATMENT
QUADRUPLE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Device: 2-0 monofilament nylon suture
Plication of the anterior rectus sheath (correction of diastasis of the rectus abdominis muscles) was performed in two layers with Device 2-0 monofilament nylon suture (control group). Operative time was recorded. All patients underwent ultrasound examination preoperatively and at 3 weeks and 6 months postoperatively to monitor for diastasis recurrence. The force required to bring the anterior rectus sheath to the midline was measured at the supraumbilical and infraumbilical levels.
Correction of diastasis of the rectus abdominis muscles
Thirty women with similar abdominal deformities, who had had at least one pregnancy, were randomized into three groups to undergo abdominoplasty. Plication of the anterior rectus sheath was performed in two layers with 2-0 monofilament nylon suture (control group) or in a single layer with either a continuous 2-0 monofilament nylon suture (group I) or using a continuous barbed suture (group II). Operative time was recorded. All patients underwent ultrasound examination preoperatively and at 3 weeks and 6 months postoperatively to monitor for diastasis recurrence. The force required to bring the anterior rectus sheath to the midline was measured at the supraumbilical and infraumbilical levels.
Device: Single layer 2-0 monofilament
Single layer with a Device 2-0 monofilament nylon suture (correction of diastasis of the rectus abdominis muscles) (group I). Operative time was recorded. All patients underwent ultrasound examination preoperatively and at 3 weeks and 6 months postoperatively to monitor for diastasis recurrence. The force required to bring the anterior rectus sheath to the midline was measured at the supraumbilical and infraumbilical levels.
Correction of diastasis of the rectus abdominis muscles
Thirty women with similar abdominal deformities, who had had at least one pregnancy, were randomized into three groups to undergo abdominoplasty. Plication of the anterior rectus sheath was performed in two layers with 2-0 monofilament nylon suture (control group) or in a single layer with either a continuous 2-0 monofilament nylon suture (group I) or using a continuous barbed suture (group II). Operative time was recorded. All patients underwent ultrasound examination preoperatively and at 3 weeks and 6 months postoperatively to monitor for diastasis recurrence. The force required to bring the anterior rectus sheath to the midline was measured at the supraumbilical and infraumbilical levels.
Device: Barbed suture Quill Nylon 1
Using a continuous Device Barbed suture Quill Nylon 1 (correction of diastasis of the rectus abdominis muscles) (group II). Operative time was recorded. All patients underwent ultrasound examination preoperatively and at 3 weeks and 6 months postoperatively to monitor for diastasis recurrence. The force required to bring the anterior rectus sheath to the midline was measured at the supraumbilical and infraumbilical levels.
Correction of diastasis of the rectus abdominis muscles
Thirty women with similar abdominal deformities, who had had at least one pregnancy, were randomized into three groups to undergo abdominoplasty. Plication of the anterior rectus sheath was performed in two layers with 2-0 monofilament nylon suture (control group) or in a single layer with either a continuous 2-0 monofilament nylon suture (group I) or using a continuous barbed suture (group II). Operative time was recorded. All patients underwent ultrasound examination preoperatively and at 3 weeks and 6 months postoperatively to monitor for diastasis recurrence. The force required to bring the anterior rectus sheath to the midline was measured at the supraumbilical and infraumbilical levels.
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Correction of diastasis of the rectus abdominis muscles
Thirty women with similar abdominal deformities, who had had at least one pregnancy, were randomized into three groups to undergo abdominoplasty. Plication of the anterior rectus sheath was performed in two layers with 2-0 monofilament nylon suture (control group) or in a single layer with either a continuous 2-0 monofilament nylon suture (group I) or using a continuous barbed suture (group II). Operative time was recorded. All patients underwent ultrasound examination preoperatively and at 3 weeks and 6 months postoperatively to monitor for diastasis recurrence. The force required to bring the anterior rectus sheath to the midline was measured at the supraumbilical and infraumbilical levels.
Other Intervention Names
Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* Age: 25 to 50 years of age
* History of at least one pregnancy
* Body mass index (BMI) between 18 and 30 kg/m2
* Desire to undergo abdominoplasty as a single procedure without receiving liposuction or other cosmetic surgeries
* Deformities of the skin and subcutaneous tissues in the abdominal region
* Musculoaponeurotic defect
Exclusion Criteria
* Abdominal wall scar (except for a Pfannenstiel scar related to a Cesarean section);
* Abdominal wall hérnias;
* History of deep-vein thrombosis;
* Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease;
* Câncer;
* Hypertension;
* Diabetes or other chronic systemic diseases;
* Use of corticosteroids.
* Patients lost to follow-up and those who did not undergo ultrasound examination were excluded from the study
25 Years
30 Years
FEMALE
Yes
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Luiz Jose Muaccad Gama
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Luiz Jose Muaccad Gama
MD
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Luiz José Muaccad Gama, MD
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Universidade Federal de São Paulo - UNIFESP
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Fábio Xerfan Nahas
São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
U1111-1175-1484
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.