Plication of the Rectus Abdominis in Two Planes and in One Continuous Suture Plan

NCT ID: NCT02674035

Last Updated: 2016-02-04

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

PHASE4

Total Enrollment

30 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2012-06-30

Study Completion Date

2014-06-30

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

Thirty women with similar abdominal deformities, who had had at least one pregnancy, were randomized into three groups to undergo abdominoplasty. Plication of the anterior rectus sheath was performed in two layers with 2-0 monofilament nylon suture (control group) or in a single layer with either a continuous 2-0 monofilament nylon suture (group I) or using a continuous barbed suture (group II). Operative time was recorded. All patients underwent ultrasound examination preoperatively and at 3 weeks and 6 months postoperatively to monitor for diastasis recurrence. The force required to bring the anterior rectus sheath to the midline was measured at the supraumbilical and infraumbilical levels.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Inclusion criteria were female gender; 25 to 50 years of age; history of at least one pregnancy; body mass index (BMI) between 18 and 30 kg/m2; desire to undergo abdominoplasty as a single procedure without receiving liposuction or other cosmetic surgeries; deformities of the skin and subcutaneous tissues in the abdominal region; and musculoaponeurotic defect.

Non-inclusion criteria were smoking habit; abdominal wall scar (except for a Pfannenstiel scar related to a Cesarean section); abdominal wall hérnias; history of deep-vein thrombosis; chronic obstructive pulmonary disease; câncer; hypertension; diabetes or other chronic systemic diseases; and use of corticosteroids. Patients lost to follow-up and those who did not undergo ultrasound examination were excluded from the study.

Primary outcome: Get a technique that provides a safe correction with lasting results and in every segment of time.

Secondary clinical outcome: confirms the plication of a single layer as positive in women patients at two years of surgery compared to two planes.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Disorder of Abdomen

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

FACTORIAL

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

QUADRUPLE

Participants Caregivers Investigators Outcome Assessors

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Device: 2-0 monofilament nylon suture

Plication of the anterior rectus sheath (correction of diastasis of the rectus abdominis muscles) was performed in two layers with Device 2-0 monofilament nylon suture (control group). Operative time was recorded. All patients underwent ultrasound examination preoperatively and at 3 weeks and 6 months postoperatively to monitor for diastasis recurrence. The force required to bring the anterior rectus sheath to the midline was measured at the supraumbilical and infraumbilical levels.

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Correction of diastasis of the rectus abdominis muscles

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Thirty women with similar abdominal deformities, who had had at least one pregnancy, were randomized into three groups to undergo abdominoplasty. Plication of the anterior rectus sheath was performed in two layers with 2-0 monofilament nylon suture (control group) or in a single layer with either a continuous 2-0 monofilament nylon suture (group I) or using a continuous barbed suture (group II). Operative time was recorded. All patients underwent ultrasound examination preoperatively and at 3 weeks and 6 months postoperatively to monitor for diastasis recurrence. The force required to bring the anterior rectus sheath to the midline was measured at the supraumbilical and infraumbilical levels.

Device: Single layer 2-0 monofilament

Single layer with a Device 2-0 monofilament nylon suture (correction of diastasis of the rectus abdominis muscles) (group I). Operative time was recorded. All patients underwent ultrasound examination preoperatively and at 3 weeks and 6 months postoperatively to monitor for diastasis recurrence. The force required to bring the anterior rectus sheath to the midline was measured at the supraumbilical and infraumbilical levels.

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Correction of diastasis of the rectus abdominis muscles

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Thirty women with similar abdominal deformities, who had had at least one pregnancy, were randomized into three groups to undergo abdominoplasty. Plication of the anterior rectus sheath was performed in two layers with 2-0 monofilament nylon suture (control group) or in a single layer with either a continuous 2-0 monofilament nylon suture (group I) or using a continuous barbed suture (group II). Operative time was recorded. All patients underwent ultrasound examination preoperatively and at 3 weeks and 6 months postoperatively to monitor for diastasis recurrence. The force required to bring the anterior rectus sheath to the midline was measured at the supraumbilical and infraumbilical levels.

Device: Barbed suture Quill Nylon 1

Using a continuous Device Barbed suture Quill Nylon 1 (correction of diastasis of the rectus abdominis muscles) (group II). Operative time was recorded. All patients underwent ultrasound examination preoperatively and at 3 weeks and 6 months postoperatively to monitor for diastasis recurrence. The force required to bring the anterior rectus sheath to the midline was measured at the supraumbilical and infraumbilical levels.

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Correction of diastasis of the rectus abdominis muscles

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Thirty women with similar abdominal deformities, who had had at least one pregnancy, were randomized into three groups to undergo abdominoplasty. Plication of the anterior rectus sheath was performed in two layers with 2-0 monofilament nylon suture (control group) or in a single layer with either a continuous 2-0 monofilament nylon suture (group I) or using a continuous barbed suture (group II). Operative time was recorded. All patients underwent ultrasound examination preoperatively and at 3 weeks and 6 months postoperatively to monitor for diastasis recurrence. The force required to bring the anterior rectus sheath to the midline was measured at the supraumbilical and infraumbilical levels.

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Correction of diastasis of the rectus abdominis muscles

Thirty women with similar abdominal deformities, who had had at least one pregnancy, were randomized into three groups to undergo abdominoplasty. Plication of the anterior rectus sheath was performed in two layers with 2-0 monofilament nylon suture (control group) or in a single layer with either a continuous 2-0 monofilament nylon suture (group I) or using a continuous barbed suture (group II). Operative time was recorded. All patients underwent ultrasound examination preoperatively and at 3 weeks and 6 months postoperatively to monitor for diastasis recurrence. The force required to bring the anterior rectus sheath to the midline was measured at the supraumbilical and infraumbilical levels.

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Other Intervention Names

Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.

Abdominoplasty

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Female gender
* Age: 25 to 50 years of age
* History of at least one pregnancy
* Body mass index (BMI) between 18 and 30 kg/m2
* Desire to undergo abdominoplasty as a single procedure without receiving liposuction or other cosmetic surgeries
* Deformities of the skin and subcutaneous tissues in the abdominal region
* Musculoaponeurotic defect

Exclusion Criteria

* Smoking habit;
* Abdominal wall scar (except for a Pfannenstiel scar related to a Cesarean section);
* Abdominal wall hérnias;
* History of deep-vein thrombosis;
* Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease;
* Câncer;
* Hypertension;
* Diabetes or other chronic systemic diseases;
* Use of corticosteroids.
* Patients lost to follow-up and those who did not undergo ultrasound examination were excluded from the study
Minimum Eligible Age

25 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

30 Years

Eligible Sex

FEMALE

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Luiz Jose Muaccad Gama

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Luiz Jose Muaccad Gama

MD

Responsibility Role SPONSOR_INVESTIGATOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Luiz José Muaccad Gama, MD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Universidade Federal de São Paulo - UNIFESP

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Fábio Xerfan Nahas

São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Brazil

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

U1111-1175-1484

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.