Use of PrineoTM (Dermabond Protape) Skin Adhesive for Wound Closure Following Abdominoplasty

NCT ID: NCT01544556

Last Updated: 2012-03-06

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Total Enrollment

1 participants

Study Classification

OBSERVATIONAL

Study Start Date

2009-07-31

Study Completion Date

2012-02-29

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

Abdominoplasty is one of the most commonly performed procedures in plastic surgery. The appearance of the scar is a major factor contributing to the aesthetic outcome of the procedure and depends largely on the technique of wound closure. The investigators routinely used resorbable subcutaneous sutures and resorbable intracutaneous sutures for this closure. To overcome the potential detrimental effects of sutures in skin closure, surgical adhesives were introduced as a new technology. The new PrineoTM wound closure system was created to combine the effectiveness of 2-octyl-cyanoacrylate (Dermabond TM) together with a self-adhering mesh to make closure of long skin incisions even more safe and reliable. PrineoTM has the potential to offer a patient several benefits over traditional wound closure with sutures.A patient treated with Prineo™ can shower immediately following a procedure because the product forms a watertight barrier over the incision. PrineoTM can be easily removed, often with less pain than is sometimes associated with suture removal, after the natural wound healing process is complete (approximately 12 to 25 days). Other benefits are that it forms a microbial barrier and provides even distribution of tension across the length of the incision to ensure wound edge approximation throughout the wound healing process. Furthermore, it reduces subcuticular closure time as compared to subcuticular suturing.

However, these potential advantages have not been proven until now, as the methods used to assess the aesthetic outcome were not reproducible in most assessments, and none of these studies assessed patient satisfaction.1-3 Moreover, none was performed in a plastic surgical patient population. For these reasons, the investigators prospectively studied the results of wound closure after abdominoplasty with randomized use of PrineoTM and conventional suturing to assess the possible difference in outcome between these two methods.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Abdominoplasty is one of the most commonly performed procedures in plastic surgery. The appearance of the scar is a major factor contributing to the aesthetic outcome of the procedure and depends largely on the technique of wound closure. The new PrineoTM wound closure system was introduced to combine the effectiveness of 2-octyl-cyanoacrylate (Dermabond TM) together with a self-adhering mesh.Fifty-two women and 8 men aged between 21 and 65 years scheduled for abdominoplasty were included in the study. Two weeks postoperatively, the wounds were examined and graded according to the Hollander Cosmesis Scale. At 3- and 6-month follow-up, the aesthetic outcome of the abdominal scar was evaluated with the Vancouver Scar Scale. Six months postoperatively, the patients were further asked to score their part of the Patient Scar Assessment Scale.The Hollander Cosmesis Scale indicated a significantly more favourable overall result with PrineoTM at 2 weeks after surgery. The Vancouver Scar Scale demonstrated a better cosmetic outcome in favour of PrineoTM 3 and 6 months after surgery The Patient Scar Assessment Scale scores 6 months after surgery indicated that the patients noted significantly less pain, thickness and irregularity with PrineoTM.Based on the investigators results, the investigators conclude that PrineoTM is a safe and effective substitute for superficial skin closure, with good cosmetic results and no increase in wound complications. The use of PrineoTM decreases operative times and enhances patients' postoperative comfort

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Late Effects of Open Wound

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Observational Model Type

CASE_CONTROL

Study Time Perspective

PROSPECTIVE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Prineo

An open, prospective, controlled, randomized clinical Study

No interventions assigned to this group

Steristrips

An open, prospective, controlled, randomized clinical Study

No interventions assigned to this group

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Exclusion Criteria

peripheral vascular disease; insulin dependent diabetes mellitus; current intake of systemic steroids; known HIV-positive or other immunocompromised status; known or suspected allergy or sensitivity to cyanoacrylate, formaldehyde, tapes or adhesives; personal or family history of keloid or hypertrophic scar formation; or additional surgical procedures performed in the same surgical session in the same anatomical region. -
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

65 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Medical University of Graz

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Daryousch Parvizi, MD

Resident

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Division of Plastic, Aesthetic and Reconstructive Surgery, Department of Surgery,Medical University of Graz, Austria

Graz, Styria, Austria

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Austria

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

Prineo2

Identifier Type: OTHER

Identifier Source: secondary_id

Prineo 1

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

Dyed vs. Undyed Polyglactin Sutures in Cutaneous Surgery
NCT07078669 ENROLLING_BY_INVITATION NA