Safety and Efficacy Study to Evaluate the Treatment of Both Near and Distance Vision in a Simultaneous Laser Procedure

NCT ID: NCT01322919

Last Updated: 2015-05-20

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

PHASE3

Total Enrollment

61 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2010-04-30

Study Completion Date

2012-03-31

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

By using a new software two consecutive laser treatments have been combined to correct the distance vision and to provide a near vision component in addition to the first treatment.

This study will help us to answer 2 questions:

1. How accurately this combined technique corrects distance and near vision
2. Whether the correction is adequate to remove the complete need for supplementary near spectacles

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

LASIK is a surgical technique where the cornea is reshaped using a laser to provide visual correction. Typically, this procedure will only correct your long distance vision requiring the use of supplementary spectacles for reading and near vision.

The Technolas 217z Excimer Laser used to deliver the treatment is approved for use in the European Community for both treatment versions to correct separately the near vision and the distance vision for cases which need one or the other correction.

By using a new software two consecutive treatments have been combined to correct the distance vision and to provide a near vision component in addition to the first treatment.

This study will help us to answer 2 questions:

1. How accurately this combined technique corrects distance and near vision
2. Whether the correction is adequate to remove the complete need for supplementary near spectacles

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Myopia Hyperopia Presbyopia Refractive Error

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

NON_RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

NONE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Myopic Treatment Arm

Patients treated in this arm will have preoperative measurements that indicate a myopic condition of the eye in conjunction with a presbyopic condition

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Supracor

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

All patients will undergo LASIK treatment on their non-dominant eye with a new laser software algorithm designed to treat both the distance and near vision components.

The developed software algorithm uses the subjective refraction of the eye to create a treatment for the distance vision correction. This part of the treatment does not show any difference to a regular LASIK treatment for ametropic cases.

In addition to the treatment for the distance vision a central ablation component will be added to address the near vision.

Hyperopic Treatment Arm

Patients treated in this arm will have preoperative measurements that indicate a hyperopic condition of the eye in conjunction with a presbyopic condition

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Supracor

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

All patients will undergo LASIK treatment on their non-dominant eye with a new laser software algorithm designed to treat both the distance and near vision components.

The developed software algorithm uses the subjective refraction of the eye to create a treatment for the distance vision correction. This part of the treatment does not show any difference to a regular LASIK treatment for ametropic cases.

In addition to the treatment for the distance vision a central ablation component will be added to address the near vision.

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Supracor

All patients will undergo LASIK treatment on their non-dominant eye with a new laser software algorithm designed to treat both the distance and near vision components.

The developed software algorithm uses the subjective refraction of the eye to create a treatment for the distance vision correction. This part of the treatment does not show any difference to a regular LASIK treatment for ametropic cases.

In addition to the treatment for the distance vision a central ablation component will be added to address the near vision.

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Other Intervention Names

Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.

Myopia Hyperopia Presbyopia PresbyLASIK LASIK

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Subjects must be at least 45 years old and not older than 85 years
* Subjects must read, understand, and sign an Informed Consent Form (ICF).
* Subjects must be willing and able to return for scheduled follow up examinations through 6 months after surgery.
* Subjects must be willing to have both eyes treated with the laser during the same visit.
* Subjects for study arm-I must have up to +4 diopters (D) of absolute spherical hyperopia (not spherical equivalent), with up to +2.5 D of refractive astigmatism (NOT corneal astigmatism) by manifest subjective refraction in both eyes. The spherical equivalent must be no more than +5.25 D. Subjects for study arm-II must have up to -7 diopters (D) of absolute spherical myopia (not spherical equivalent), with up to -4.0 D of refractive astigmatism (NOT corneal astigmatism) by manifest subjective refraction in both eyes. The spherical equivalent must be no more than -9.00 D.
* Subjects must have presbyopia as determined by an age-related need for optical aid (\> +1.50 D) for reading with their best distance correction.
* Subjects who have been screened successfully for acceptance of the PresbyLasik simulation
* Subjects who are contact lens wearers must have gas permeable (GP) lenses discontinued for at least 3 weeks and soft lenses discontinued for at least 1 week prior to the preoperative evaluation in the eye to be treated. Contact lens wearers who wear their contact lenses for any amount of time between the preoperative baseline examination and the operative visit must not be treated.
* Corneal topography should be normal.
* Subjects who are contact lens wearers must have 2 central keratometry readings and 2 manifest subjective refractions taken preoperatively at least one week apart. The refraction values must not differ by more than 0.50D as defined by manifest refraction spherical equivalent (MRSE). The keratometry values must not differ from the previous values by more than 0.50D in either meridian.
* High contrast, manifest, best spectacle-corrected logMAR distance visual acuity (VA) must be correctable to at least 0.1 (20/25 or 6/7.5) in both eyes.

Exclusion Criteria

* Subjects for whom the combination of their baseline corneal thickness and the planned operative parameters for the LASIK procedure would result in less than 250 microns of remaining posterior corneal thickness below the flap postoperatively.
* Eyes for which the baseline manifest subjective refraction exhibits a difference of greater than 0.75D in sphere power, or a difference of greater than 0.50D in cylinder power, or a difference in cylinder axis of more than 15 degrees compared to the baseline cycloplegic subjective refraction. For manifest cylinder of less than 0.75D, the difference in cylinder axis will not be taken into consideration.
* Subjects for whom the preoperative assessment of the ocular topography indicates that one or both eyes are not suitable candidates for treatment based upon the suggested computer-simulated treatment plan.
* Any subject who is going to be co-managed by an ophthalmologist or optometrist who is not approved as a Technolas Perfect Vision GmbH Excimer laser Investigator.
* Subjects with anterior segment pathology, including dry eye syndrome and cataracts which in the Investigator's opinion, would interfere with best spectacle-corrected VA (BSCVA) or a successful treatment.
* Subjects with evidence of retinal vascular disease.
* Subjects with any residual, recurrent, or active ocular disease, or corneal abnormality that in the Investigator's opinion would interfere with BSCVA or a successful treatment.
* Subjects with signs of keratoconus.
* Subjects with unstable central keratometry readings with irregular mires.
* Subjects who have undergone previous intraocular or corneal surgery of any kind, including any type of excimer laser surgery for either refractive or therapeutic purposes.
* Subjects who have a history of Herpes simplex or Herpes zoster keratitis.
* Subjects who have a history of glaucoma or glaucoma suspect.
* Subjects who are immunocompromised or carrying diagnosis of connective tissue disease, clinically significant atopic disease, diabetes, autoimmune diseases and other acute or chronic illnesses that will increase the risk to the subject or confound the outcomes of this study.
* Subjects taking systemic medications likely to affect wound healing such as corticosteroids or antimetabolites.
* Subjects who are known to be pregnant, lactating, or who plan to become pregnant during the course of the study.
* Subjects with known sensitivity to medications used for standard LASIK.
* Subjects participating in any other ophthalmic clinical trials during this clinical trial.
* Subjects with an ocular muscle disorder including a strabismus or nystagmus, or other disorders affecting fixation.
* Subjects at risk for angle closure.
Minimum Eligible Age

45 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

85 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Technolas Perfect Vision GmbH

INDUSTRY

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Enrique Barragan, M.D.

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Laser Ocular Hidalgo

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Laser Ocular Hidalgo

Monterrey, N.l., Mexico

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Mexico

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Telandro AP, Steile J 3rd. Presbyopia: perspective on the reality of pseudoaccommodation with LASIK. Ophthalmol Clin North Am. 2006 Mar;19(1):45-69, vi. doi: 10.1016/j.ohc.2005.10.006.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 16500528 (View on PubMed)

Epstein RL, Gurgos MA. Presbyopia treatment by monocular peripheral presbyLASIK. J Refract Surg. 2009 Jun;25(6):516-23. doi: 10.3928/1081597X-20090512-05.

Reference Type RESULT
PMID: 19603619 (View on PubMed)

Alio JL, Amparo F, Ortiz D, Moreno L. Corneal multifocality with excimer laser for presbyopia correction. Curr Opin Ophthalmol. 2009 Jul;20(4):264-71. doi: 10.1097/icu.0b013e32832a7ded.

Reference Type RESULT
PMID: 19537363 (View on PubMed)

Pinelli R, Ortiz D, Simonetto A, Bacchi C, Sala E, Alio JL. Correction of presbyopia in hyperopia with a center-distance, paracentral-near technique using the Technolas 217z platform. J Refract Surg. 2008 May;24(5):494-500. doi: 10.3928/1081597X-20080501-07.

Reference Type RESULT
PMID: 18494342 (View on PubMed)

Illueca C, Alio JL, Mas D, Ortiz D, Perez J, Espinosa J, Esperanza S. Pseudoaccommodation and visual acuity with Technovision presbyLASIK and a theoretical simulated Array multifocal intraocular lens. J Refract Surg. 2008 Apr;24(4):344-9. doi: 10.3928/1081597X-20080401-05.

Reference Type RESULT
PMID: 18500082 (View on PubMed)

Ortiz D, Alio JL, Illueca C, Mas D, Sala E, Perez J, Espinosa J. Optical analysis of presbyLASIK treatment by a light propagation algorithm. J Refract Surg. 2007 Jan;23(1):39-44. doi: 10.3928/1081-597X-20070101-07.

Reference Type RESULT
PMID: 17269242 (View on PubMed)

Alio JL, Chaubard JJ, Caliz A, Sala E, Patel S. Correction of presbyopia by technovision central multifocal LASIK (presbyLASIK). J Refract Surg. 2006 May;22(5):453-60. doi: 10.3928/1081-597X-20060501-06.

Reference Type RESULT
PMID: 16722483 (View on PubMed)

Becker KA, Jaksche A, Holz FG. [PresbyLASIK: treatment approaches with the excimer laser]. Ophthalmologe. 2006 Aug;103(8):667-72. doi: 10.1007/s00347-006-1391-y. German.

Reference Type RESULT
PMID: 16850290 (View on PubMed)

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

1001

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

CONTOURA vs WFO Ablation PRK & LASIK
NCT05037370 RECRUITING NA
Long-term LASIK Follow up Study
NCT01695642 COMPLETED