Visual Outcomes and Patient Satisfaction With Bilateral PanOptix Verses Bilateral Synergy

NCT ID: NCT06041139

Last Updated: 2025-05-23

Study Results

Results available

Outcome measurements, participant flow, baseline characteristics, and adverse events have been published for this study.

View full results

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Total Enrollment

230 participants

Study Classification

OBSERVATIONAL

Study Start Date

2022-09-12

Study Completion Date

2024-04-16

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

Background:

* The Tecnis Synergy intraocular lens (IOL) has a claim to allow patients to experience continuous high-contrast vision from far through near even in low-light conditions.
* A J\&J-sponsored post marketing study done outside of the US claim superiority of range of vision for the Tecnis Synergy IOL over the PanOptix IOL.

Hypothesis:

* Patients with bilateral Panoptix IOLs have non-inferior distance, intermediate, and near visual acuity compared to patients with bilateral Synergy IOLs in both photopic and mesopic conditions with less glare, haloes, and/or starbursts.

Unmet Medical Need:

* There is a need to look at patient visual outcomes and the visual disturbance profile comparing trifocal technology with combined EDOF/Bifocal technology in the United States.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

* This is a non-interventional single center, two-arm comparative study of the outcomes for patients following successful, uncomplicated cataract surgery.
* There will be 155 subjects enrolled in each arm (310 subjects total).
* Consecutive screening will be used for enrollment beginning from the first bilateral IOL implanted.
* All testing will be at a single site with subjects coming from 4 surgeons (all use similar surgical technique) at that site.
* Each surgeon will contribute a minimum of ten subjects per arm.
* Subjects will be assessed post-operatively during a minimum of five months after their second-eye surgery.
* Binocular defocus curves will be performed from +1.00 to -4.00 in 0.50 diopter steps and with +0.25 and -0.25 added.
* Self-reporting of visual complaints will be assessed.
* IOLSAT (IOL Satisfaction) and QUVID (Quality of Vision After Surgery) questionnaire will be administered at the study visit.
* Halo and Glare simulator VS Halo \& Glare (visu-med.com) will be administered at the study visit.
* All visual acuity testing will be measured in LogMar and all study technicians and evaluators will be masked.
* PanOptix subjects will have been implanted with the toric and non-toric models.
* Synergy subjects will have been implanted with the toric and non-toric models.
* Demographic data will be collected to match the groups as closely as possible.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Pseudophakia

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Observational Model Type

CASE_CONTROL

Study Time Perspective

PROSPECTIVE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Alcon PanOptix

Patients will have had bilateral implantation of PanOptix IOLs with the toric and/or non-toric models at the time of uncomplicated cataract surgery.

Visual Acuity

Intervention Type DIAGNOSTIC_TEST

Measurement of distance, intermediate and near visual acuity.

Defocus Curve

Intervention Type DIAGNOSTIC_TEST

Measurement of visual acuity performed from +1.00 to -4.00 in 0.50 diopter steps and with +0.25 and -0.25 added.

Halo and Glare testing

Intervention Type DIAGNOSTIC_TEST

Measurement to quantify degree of visual loss caused by either halo and/or glare.

Patient Questionnaires

Intervention Type OTHER

Patients will complete a series of questionnaires to record self-reported visual disturbances, visual acuity satisfaction, level of spectacle independence and any issues with glare, halos, and/or starbursts.

Johnson & Johnson Synergy

Patients will have had bilateral implantation of Synergy IOLs with the toric and/or non-toric models at the time of uncomplicated cataract surgery.

Visual Acuity

Intervention Type DIAGNOSTIC_TEST

Measurement of distance, intermediate and near visual acuity.

Defocus Curve

Intervention Type DIAGNOSTIC_TEST

Measurement of visual acuity performed from +1.00 to -4.00 in 0.50 diopter steps and with +0.25 and -0.25 added.

Halo and Glare testing

Intervention Type DIAGNOSTIC_TEST

Measurement to quantify degree of visual loss caused by either halo and/or glare.

Patient Questionnaires

Intervention Type OTHER

Patients will complete a series of questionnaires to record self-reported visual disturbances, visual acuity satisfaction, level of spectacle independence and any issues with glare, halos, and/or starbursts.

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Visual Acuity

Measurement of distance, intermediate and near visual acuity.

Intervention Type DIAGNOSTIC_TEST

Defocus Curve

Measurement of visual acuity performed from +1.00 to -4.00 in 0.50 diopter steps and with +0.25 and -0.25 added.

Intervention Type DIAGNOSTIC_TEST

Halo and Glare testing

Measurement to quantify degree of visual loss caused by either halo and/or glare.

Intervention Type DIAGNOSTIC_TEST

Patient Questionnaires

Patients will complete a series of questionnaires to record self-reported visual disturbances, visual acuity satisfaction, level of spectacle independence and any issues with glare, halos, and/or starbursts.

Intervention Type OTHER

Other Intervention Names

Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.

VS Halo & Glare (visu-med.com) IOLSAT, QUVID and Self-Reported Visual Disturbance Questionnaire

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Are willing and able to understand and sign an informed consent
* Are willing and able to complete all required study visits
* Are more than 40 years of age
* Patient diagnosed with cataracts both eyes and underwent uncomplicated cataract surgeries
* Patients with bilateral PanOptix (toric or non-toric)
* Patients with bilateral Synergy (toric or non-toric)
* Post-op best Corrected distance Visual Acuity for each eye is logMAR 0.1 (20/25) or better after cataract removal.
* Post-op residual refractive error +0.50 - -0.50 SE with ≤ 0.75 residual refractive astigmatism in each eye
* Minimum of two weeks post Yttrium Aluminum Garnet capsulotomy to treat posterior capsular opacification

Exclusion Criteria

* Corneal dystrophies or degenerations
* Failure to return for follow up at designed intervals.
* Any conditions that might affect cataract removal (pseudoexfoliation, posterior polar cataract, Flomax, etc.)
* Any conditions during surgery that might prolong the cataract removal (capsular tear, inadequate pupil dilation, etc.)
* Strabismus with or without amblyopia in either eye
* Previous ocular surgery of any kind
* History of retinal detachment
* Any corneal abnormality, other than regular corneal astigmatism (as determined by corneal topography) that in the opinion of the investigator would confound the outcome(s) of the study
* Subjects with diagnosed degenerative visual disorders (e.g., macular degeneration or other retinal disorders) that in the opinion of the investigator is clinically significant
* Subjects with glaucoma
* Subjects who have an acute or chronic disease or illness that would confound the results of this investigation (e.g. immunocompromised, connective tissue disease, clinically significant atopic disease, diabetes, etc)
Minimum Eligible Age

40 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Berkeley Eye Center

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Morgan Micheletti, MD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Berkeley Eye Center

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Berkeley Eye Center

Houston, Texas, United States

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

United States

Provided Documents

Download supplemental materials such as informed consent forms, study protocols, or participant manuals.

Document Type: Study Protocol and Statistical Analysis Plan

View Document

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

69881171

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.