DARE-trial: A Trial Studying the Effect of the SeQuent Please Drug-eluting Balloon Compared to the Xience Prime Drug-eluting Stent for the Treatment of Stenosis of an Earlier Implanted Stent.

NCT ID: NCT01127958

Last Updated: 2017-02-17

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

UNKNOWN

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

270 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2010-05-31

Study Completion Date

2020-06-30

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

The main objective of the study is to determine whether PCI for in-stent restenosis with a drug eluting balloon is angiographically non-inferior to PCI with a drug eluting stent at 6 month follow up.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Background of the study:

Coronary in-stent restenosis is commonly treated by using a drug eluting stent (DES). There are, however, some concerns about the safety of drug eluting stents, in particular with respect to delayed healing, chronic inflammatory reaction, and late or very late stent thrombosis. It is unknown whether the current treatment with another layer of stents may add to the risk of stent thrombosis or reoccurrence of restenosis. Therefore, the relatively new drug-eluting balloons may provide an alternative for treatment of in-stent restenosis, avoiding a double stent layer. The expected advantages of such drug-eluting balloons over stents are the ease of access of the lesion, the absence of a multiple stent layer, and the shorter necessity of the use of dual antiplatelet therapy. Several studies have demonstrated safety and efficacy of the Sequent Please drug-eluting balloon (DEB). Whether the drug eluting balloon is as effective as a drug eluting stent in preventing re-restenosis is not known.

Study design:

The study is designed as an multi-center, randomized, prospective two-arm trial with either PCI with a drug eluting balloon or a drug eluting stent for in-stent restenosis. Blinded evaluation of endpoints by independent core laboratory.

Study population:

The study population consists of 270 patients ( ≥ 18 years of age) with indication for PCI for in-stent restenosis of whom 135 are randomised to a drug eluting balloon and 135 are randomised to a drug eluting stent. Individuals have signed an informed consent for study measurements.

Intervention:

PCI with a drug-eluting stent, or PCI with a drug-eluting balloon.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

In-stent Restenosis

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

SINGLE

Participants

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

SeQuent Please

PCI with drug-eluting balloon

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

PCI with a drug-eluting balloon

Intervention Type DEVICE

PCI with a drug-eluting balloon for in-stent restenosis

Xience Prime

PCI with a drug-eluting stent

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

PCI with a drug-eluting stent

Intervention Type DEVICE

PCI with a drug-eluting stent for in-stent restenosis

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

PCI with a drug-eluting balloon

PCI with a drug-eluting balloon for in-stent restenosis

Intervention Type DEVICE

PCI with a drug-eluting stent

PCI with a drug-eluting stent for in-stent restenosis

Intervention Type DEVICE

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Restenosis of the initially stented main vessel, including ostial, left main and bifurcation lesions as well as venous or arterial grafts
* Restenosis of any type of stent; all drug-eluting stents or bare metal stents
* Restenosis must be present \> 50% in-stent and \< 5 mm out of the stent
* A reference diameter of ≥ 2.0 to 4.0 millimeters by visual estimation
* Amendable to PCI treatment with either the SeQuent ® Please DEB or the Xience™ Prime DES
* Amendable to dual antiplatelet treatment for the duration of 1 year
* Patients must be ≥ 18 years of age
* Patients must be able to understand the aim of the study, including risks, benefits and treatment alternatives
* Patients must agree to undergo a follow-up angiogram at 6 months (± 1 month)
* Patients must agree to undergo a clinical follow-up at 30 days, 6 months, 1, 2, 3, 4, and 5 years

* Life expectancy less than one year
* Severe renal insufficiency (glomerular filtration rate \<30mL/min), with exception of of patients with renal dialysis
* STEMI
* Restenosis in a biodegradable stent
* Restenosis in a non CE marked stent
* Requirement for PCI in the same vessel or expected in the next 6 months

Exclusion Criteria

* The impossibility to arrange a follow-up coronary angiography at 6 months (± 1 month) after baseline procedure is considered an exclusion criterion for this study
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

B. Braun Medical B.V.

INDUSTRY

Sponsor Role collaborator

Academisch Medisch Centrum - Universiteit van Amsterdam (AMC-UvA)

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

J. Baan

J. Baan, MD, PhD

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Jan Baan, Dr

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Academisch Medisch Centrum - Universiteit van Amsterdam (AMC-UvA)

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Academisch Medisch Centrum

Amsterdam, , Netherlands

Site Status

OLVG

Amsterdam, , Netherlands

Site Status

VUmc

Amsterdam, , Netherlands

Site Status

Tergooi Ziekenhuizen

Blaricum, , Netherlands

Site Status

Amphia Ziekenhuis

Breda, , Netherlands

Site Status

Albert Schweitzer ziekenhuis

Dordrecht, , Netherlands

Site Status

UMC St Radboud

Nijmegen, , Netherlands

Site Status

Isala klinieken

Zwolle, , Netherlands

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Netherlands

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

NL3148701810

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.