Efficacy of Angiolite Stent vs a Second-generation Drug-eluting Stent Xience for Percutaneous Coronary Intervention

NCT ID: NCT03049657

Last Updated: 2019-04-12

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

220 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2016-02-02

Study Completion Date

2019-01-28

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

Clinical trial with an "European Community marked" medical device in patients with ischemic heart disease and clinical indication of coronary revascularization with drug-eluting stent.

Clinical follow-up will be done according to this way: first month telephone or face-to-face interview and at 6 ± 1 month an Angiography follow up + OCT (optical coherence tomography)

A randomized clinical trial to compare the efficacy of Angiolite Stent versus a second-generation drug-eluting stent such as Xience stent.(non-inferiority design)

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Coronary Artery Disease Drug-eluting Stent

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

OTHER

Blinding Strategy

NONE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

ANGIOLITE

Compare the efficacy of Angiolite Stent versus a second-generation drug-eluting stent such as Xience stent.

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Angiolite

Intervention Type DEVICE

Percutaneous coronary intervention

Xience

Compare the efficacy of Angiolite Stent versus a second-generation drug-eluting stent such as Xience stent.

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Xience

Intervention Type DEVICE

Percutaneous coronary intervention

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Angiolite

Percutaneous coronary intervention

Intervention Type DEVICE

Xience

Percutaneous coronary intervention

Intervention Type DEVICE

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Patients with clinical or subclinical ischemic heart disease with indication of percutaneous revascularization.
* "De Novo" lesions ≥ 70%
* Reference diameters ≥ 2 mm and ≤ 4 mm Accepted participation in the registration with the signing of informed consent

Exclusion Criteria

* Cardiogenic shock
* Pregnancy
* Intolerance or allergy to anti platelet or anticoagulant therapy
* Elective surgical procedure scheduled within 6 months after inclusion in the study
* Expectancy of life of less than 1 year.
* Impossibility of doing 1 year clinical follow-up.
* Primary angioplasty in patients with killip class III-IV or mechanical complications.
* Patient with pre-procedure restenosis.
* Patients who will not be treated all lesions with the Angiolite stent.
* Total occlusions
* Truncus disease
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Cardiva2 S.L.

INDUSTRY

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Carlos Ibares

Role: STUDY_DIRECTOR

Cardiva2 S.L.

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Hospital Universitario de Santiago de Compostela

Santiago de Compostela, A Coruña, Spain

Site Status

Hospital de León

León, León, Spain

Site Status

Hospital Virgen de la Arrixaca

El Palmar, Murcia, Spain

Site Status

Hospital Infanta Cristina

Badajoz, , Spain

Site Status

Hospital Valle de Hebrón

Barcelona, , Spain

Site Status

Hospital Virgen de las Nieves

Granada, , Spain

Site Status

Hospital Juan Ramón Jiménez

Huelva, , Spain

Site Status

Hospital La Paz

Madrid, , Spain

Site Status

Hospital Marqués de Valdecilla

Santander, , Spain

Site Status

Hospital Virgen de la Salud

Toledo, , Spain

Site Status

Hospital Clinico Universitario de Valladolid

Valladolid, , Spain

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Spain

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

ANGIOLITE

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.