Acrobat Coronary Stent System Effectiveness European Study
NCT ID: NCT01761591
Last Updated: 2014-08-26
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
TERMINATED
NA
300 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2012-12-31
2014-01-31
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
A Comparison of an Ultrathin Strut Biodegradable Polymer Sirolimus-Eluting Stent With a Durable Polymer Everolimus-Eluting Stent for Patients With Acute ST-Segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction Undergoing Primary Percutaneous Coronary Intervention
NCT02579031
ABSORB Bioresorbable Scaffold vs. Xience Metallic Stent for Prevention of Restenosis in Patients at High Risk of Restenosis
NCT02486068
Safety and Efficacy Study of the Svelte Drug-Eluting Coronary Stent Delivery System
NCT01788150
Study of Vascular Healing With the Combo Stent Versus the Everolimus Eluting Stent in ACS Patients by Means of OCT
NCT01405287
Efficacy of Angiolite Stent vs a Second-generation Drug-eluting Stent Xience for Percutaneous Coronary Intervention
NCT03049657
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
1. The evaluated stent is clinically non-inferior to control BMS in terms of freedom of MACE
2. The evaluated stent is clinically beneficial compared to control BMS by reducing exposure to radiations, amount of contrast medium administered, procedure time, as well as amount of administered heparin,
3. The evaluated stent does not result in more frequent adverse events than control BMS,
4. The evaluated stent improves direct stenting success while not decreasing procedural success compared to control BMS.
5. Resource utilization (R.U.):
1. Hospital-perspective resource utilization during the index admission and index procedure is not greater with evaluated the stent and potentially lower than with control BMS
2. Resource utilization over a 6-month time-horizon, in relation to routine follow-up and MACE, is not greater with the evaluated stent than with control BMS.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
TREATMENT
NONE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Acrobat
Device: PCI with Svelte Acrobat
PCI with Svelte Acrobat
Percutaneous coronary intervention with Svelte Acrobat Coronary Stent System
Control BMS
Device: PCI with other BMS
PCI with other BMS
Percutaneous coronary intervention with any other routine use CE marked bare metal stent (BMS) implantable either via direct stenting or after lesion pre-dilation
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
PCI with Svelte Acrobat
Percutaneous coronary intervention with Svelte Acrobat Coronary Stent System
PCI with other BMS
Percutaneous coronary intervention with any other routine use CE marked bare metal stent (BMS) implantable either via direct stenting or after lesion pre-dilation
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* symptomatic CAD: either stable angina pectoris (CCS 1, 2, 3 pr 4) or unstable (Braunwald Class 1-3, B-C) or positive functional ischemia study
* Male and post-menopausal female
* Patient provides written informed consent prior to procedure
* Patient willing to comply with protocol
* Acceptable candidate for CABG
* Patient indicated for stenting of one or more de novo stenotic lesions in native coronary arteries or bypass grafts with or without direct stenting
* None of the lesions requires stenting with Drug eluting stents
* At least one lesion is visually estimated to be candidate for direct stenting
* All target lesions for stenting have a visually estimatd RVD \>= 2.5 mm and \<= 3.5 mm
* All target lesions for stenting are visually estimated to have LL =\< 20 mm (to cover the lesion with 1 stent)
* All target lesions for stenting visually estimated to have a stenosis \> 50% and \< 99%
* All target lesions for stenting are ACS lesions TIMI flow \>= 1
Exclusion Criteria
* A previous coronary procedure within 30 days
* Any of the target lesion(s) requires treatment with a device other than PTCA prior to stent placement (such as, but not limited to, directional coronary atherectomy, excimer laser, rotational atherectomy, etc.)
* Previous BMS deployment anywhere in the target vessel within the past 6 months
* Any DES deployment anywhere in the target vessel within the past 9 months
* Any previous stent placement within 10 mm (proximal or distal) of the target lesion
* Patient has diabetes mellitus
* Co-morbid condition(s) that could limit the patient's participation or impact the trial
* Documented LVEF \< 30% at the most recent evaluation
* Evidence of AMI within 72 hours of the intended trial procedure and/or with TIMI flow 0
* History of CVA or TIA in the last 6 months
* Leukopenia (\<3.5 x 10\^9/L)
* Neutropenia (\<1000/mm3) \<= 3 days prior to enrollment
* Thrombocytopenia (\<10\^5/mm3) pre-procedure
* Active peptic ulcer or active GI bleeding
* History of bleeding diathesis or coagulopathy or inability to accept blood transfusions
* Known hypersensitivity or contraindication to aspirin, heparin or bivalirudin, clopidogrel or ticlopidine, cobalt, nickel, L-605 Cobalt chromium alloy or sensitivity to contrast media, which cannot be adequately pre-medicated
* Serum creatinine level \> 2.5 mg per dl within 7 days prior to index procedure
* In-stent restenosis
* Patient not able to give consent or read or write or protected by law or under guardianship or deprived of civil rights
* Woman of childbearing age
* Patient not covered by health or social insurance
* Unprotected left main CAD with obstruction \> 50% , not protected by at least one non-obstructed bypass graft to the LAD or left circumflex (LCX) artery or their branches
* Target vessel exhibiting multiple lesions \> 40% diameter stenosis outside of a range of 5 mm proximal and distal to the target lesion(s) to be stented based on visual estimate or on-line QCA
* Any target lesion for stenting exhibits an intraluminal thrombus (occupying \> 50% of the true lumen diameter) at any time
* Any target lesion for stenting is excessively tortuous (two bends \> 90° to reach the target lesion)
* Lesion location that is aorto-ostial or within 5 mm of the origin of the LAD or LCX
* Any target lesion for stenting is has side branches \> 2.0 mm in diameter in which bifurcation stenting is planned
* Any target lesion \>20 mm
* Any target lesion totally occluded (CTO)
* Any target lesion has TIMI flow = 0
* Any target lesion with ISR
18 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Svelte Medical Systems Europe
INDUSTRY
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Jean Fajadet, MD
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Clinique Pasteur, 45 avenue Lombez, Toulouse 31300, France, Tel. 33 (0)5 62 21 16 99 - [email protected]
Andrew Schut
Role: STUDY_DIRECTOR
Svelte Medical Systems, Inc., 675 Central Avenue, New Providence, NJ 07974, USA, Tel. 1.908.264.2181 - [email protected]
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
OLV Ziekenhuis
Aalst, , Belgium
ZNA Middelheim - Hartcentrum
Antwerp, , Belgium
ZOL Sint Jan
Genk, , Belgium
CHU Liège - Sart Tilman
Liège, , Belgium
CHU Nord Grenoble - A. Michalon
La Tronche, , France
AP-HP Hôpital Européen Georges Pompidou
Paris, , France
AP-HP La Pitié Salpétrière
Paris, , France
CHU Bordeaux Sud - Hôpital Cardiologique Haut Lévêque
Pessac, , France
Clinique St Hilaire
Rouen, , France
CHU Rangueil
Toulouse, , France
Clinique Pasteur
Toulouse, , France
Hospital Universitari Vall d'Hebrón
Barcelona, , Spain
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Piscione F, Piccolo R, Cassese S, Galasso G, D'Andrea C, De Rosa R, Chiariello M. Is direct stenting superior to stenting with predilation in patients treated with percutaneous coronary intervention? Results from a meta-analysis of 24 randomised controlled trials. Heart. 2010 Apr;96(8):588-94. doi: 10.1136/hrt.2009.183277.
Shao C, Stella PR, Agostoni P. Complex made easy: left anterior descending artery trifurcation lesion completely treated with a single device. J Invasive Cardiol. 2012 Aug;24(8):E164-6.
de Ribamar Costa J, Abizaid A, Stella P, Fernandez A, Granada J, Feres F, Serruys P. Preliminary results of the svelte trial: first-in-man assessment of the novel acrobat™ SOAW (Stent-On-A-Wire) coronary system. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2011;57(14s1):E1658-E1658. doi:10.1016/S0735-1097(11)61658-6
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
ID RCB: 2012-A00670-43
Identifier Type: OTHER
Identifier Source: secondary_id
Svelte_13-002
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.