Comparison of Stent Graft, Sirolimus Stent, and Bare Metal Stent Implanted in Patients With Acute Coronary Syndrome

NCT ID: NCT00452517

Last Updated: 2007-03-27

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

PHASE4

Total Enrollment

100 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2004-03-31

Study Completion Date

2004-11-30

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

During the 6-month period 119 patients with acute coronary syndrome, were randomized to either stent graft group (n=40), sirolimus eluting stent group (n=39), or bare metal stent group (n=40). Demographic, angiographic and procedural characteristics were similar for all three groups. The incidence of 6-month major adverse coronary events were analysed.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Background: Percutaneous coronary intervention with stent implantation is a standard therapy for patients with acute coronary syndrome. The in-stent restenosis is still a problem. Recently, drug eluting stents reduce the incidence of this unfavorable event. The primary role of the polytetrafluoroethylene stent graft (PTFE) is management of coronary perforations, closure of coronary aneurysms, and in degenerated saphenous vein grafts. We compared these stents in native coronary vessels in patients with acute coronary syndrome with sirolimus and bare metal stents, for possible reduction of in-stent restenosis.

Methods and results: During the 6-month period 119 patients with acute coronary syndrome, were randomized to either stent graft group (n=40), sirolimus eluting stent group (n=39), or bare metal stent group (n=40). Demographic, angiographic and procedural characteristics were similar for all three groups. The incidence of 6-month major adverse coronary events was similar in all three groups. The target lesion revascularisation was higher in the bare metal stent group (P=0.044). The primary end-point, restenosis rate at six-month follow-up was higher in the bare metal stent group, compared with the stent graft and sirolimus eluting stent groups. The percent diameter stenosis in follow-up was significantly higher in bare metal stent group (P=0.005). The late loss was significantly lower in the sirolimus eluting stent group (0.23 mm), compared with the bare metal stent group (P= 0.034). There was a trend of lower late loss in the stent graft group, compared with bare metal stent group.

Conclusion: Three groups of stents implanted in patients with acute coronary syndrome (stent-graft, sirolimus and bare metal), did not differ regarding the incidence of major adverse cardiac events. Sirolimus-eluting stents had a lower incidence of in-stent restenosis in comparison with bare metal stent group. Stent graft implanted in native coronary arteries appears to be safe and efficient in patients with acute coronary syndrome, but a significant reduction of in-stent restenosis was not achieved.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Acute Coronary Syndrome

Keywords

Explore important study keywords that can help with search, categorization, and topic discovery.

bare metal stents sirolimus-eluting stents coronary polytetrafluoroethylene stent graft acute coronary syndrome quantitative coronary angiography analysis major adverse cardiac events in-stent restenosis target lesion revascularisation

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

NONE

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Percutaneous Coronary Intervention

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* stent implantation in acute coronary syndrome

Exclusion Criteria

* previous percutaneous coronary intervention or coronary artery bypass graft surgery
* multivessel, diffuse disease, tortuous vessel
* arteries less than 3 mm in diameter
* distal stenosis location
* left main and bifurcation lesions
Minimum Eligible Age

20 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

80 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

University of Zagreb

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Maja Strozzi, MD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

University hospital Zagreb

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

University hospital Zagreb

Zagreb, , Croatia

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Croatia

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Keeley EC, Boura JA, Grines CL. Comparison of primary and facilitated percutaneous coronary interventions for ST-elevation myocardial infarction: quantitative review of randomised trials. Lancet. 2006 Feb 18;367(9510):579-88. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(06)68148-8.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 16488801 (View on PubMed)

Saia F, Lemos PA, Lee CH, Arampatzis CA, Hoye A, Degertekin M, Tanabe K, Sianos G, Smits PC, McFadden E, Hofma SH, van der Giessen WJ, de Feyter PJ, van Domburg RT, Serruys PW. Sirolimus-eluting stent implantation in ST-elevation acute myocardial infarction: a clinical and angiographic study. Circulation. 2003 Oct 21;108(16):1927-9. doi: 10.1161/01.CIR.0000096053.87580.CD. Epub 2003 Oct 13.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 14557354 (View on PubMed)

Strozzi M, Anic D. Comparison of stent graft, sirolimus stent, and bare metal stent implanted in patients with acute coronary syndrome: clinical and angiographic follow-up. Croat Med J. 2007 Jun;48(3):348-52.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 17589978 (View on PubMed)

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

SG-SIR-BM-07

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id