Effectiveness of Stiffening Wire in Colonoscopy With Pre-Owned Colonoscopes

NCT ID: NCT01115010

Last Updated: 2011-08-03

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

TERMINATED

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

112 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2009-12-31

Study Completion Date

2011-01-31

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

The study aims to determine whether a proprietary, FDA approved stiffening wire improves the efficiency of colonoscopy (that is, decreases the duration of the procedure) and/or enables complete visualization of the colon in a greater proportion of cases (than when the procedure is performed without it) with old, used colonoscopes.

Colonoscopes are designed with a delicate balance between stiffness and flexibility. Stiffness helps to prevent curling (looping) of the colonoscope in those sections of the colon that are not fixed to the wall of the abdominal cavity and flexibility enables successful negotiation of bends or flexures in the colon. As colonoscopes age, they lose stiffness and this makes it very challenging to advance the colonoscope all the way to the cecum (the upper end of the colon). Even when the cecum is successfully reached, it may take an inordinately long time.

In Jamaica, most endoscopists (General Surgeons and Gastroenterologists) use older, pre-owned colonoscopes imported from the USA, because the average patient and local health insurance companies cannot bear the level of fees that would enable cost recovery for new equipment.

The stiffening wires (in two grades of stiffness) used in this study are passed through the biopsy channel of the colonoscope only after its tip has passed the upper end of the descending colon and entered the transverse colon. The device is safe when used as recommended by the manufacturers (and approved by the FDA), and does not appear to increase risk over and above the risk of colonoscopy with the unassisted colonoscope. Although the device clearly improves the stiffness of the colonoscope, there is no research evidence that it actually works in practice, either to improve cecal intubation rate or to decrease procedure time. It is therefore also unclear whether the possible benefit of using the device is achieved if introduced at the first opportunity allowed by the manufacturers or only after difficulty is encountered with the unassisted colonoscope.

In this study, patients are randomly assigned to one of 3 "interventions". One group has colonoscopy performed with the colonoscope alone and the wires are only introduced if there is difficulty advancing the colonoscope after it has passed into the transverse colon ("difficulty" defined as failure to advance the tip of the colonoscope after 5 minutes). In the 2nd and 3rd groups, the assigned wire will be introduced as soon as the colonoscope enters the transverse colon and is removed if "difficulty" is encountered, as defined above. The different phases of colonoscopy will be timed with a stop watch and when a sufficient number of patients has been accrued, the investigator will be able to compare the time it takes to complete the procedure with and without the wires as well as the proportion of cases in which the cecum was reached with and without the assistance of the wires.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Colonoscopy

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

DIAGNOSTIC

Blinding Strategy

SINGLE

Participants

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Stiffening wire only if difficulty

Colonoscopy is performed with the unassisted colonoscope. The stiffening wire is introduced only if there is difficulty advancing the colonoscope and only after the tip has passed the splenic flexure. Difficulty is defined as failure to advance the tip of the scope after 5 minutes of trying.

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Colonoscope stiffening device

Intervention Type DEVICE

Colonoscopy is performed with the unassisted colonoscope (Olympus CF-100TL). The "standard" stiffening wire is introduced only if there is difficulty advancing the colonoscope and only after the tip has passed the splenic flexure. Difficulty is defined as failure to advance the tip of the scope after 5 minutes of trying. If difficulty is again encountered, the "firm" wire replaces the "standard" wire. Further difficulty requires removal of the firm wire and so on until cecal intubation is achieved or the procedure is abandoned.

Stiffening wire #1 transverse colon

Colonoscopy is started with the unassisted colonoscope. Stiffening wire #1 is introduced on entry of the tip of the colonoscope into the transverse colon.

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Colonoscope stiffening device

Intervention Type DEVICE

"Standard" stiffening wire introduced routinely on entry into transverse colon. If difficulty is encountered (as defined previously), the "standard" wire is removed and attempts made to advance the colonoscope without it. Further difficulty requires introduction of the "firm" wire and so on until cecal intubation is achieved or the procedure is abandoned.

Stiffening wire #2 transverse colon

Colonoscopy is started with the unassisted colonoscope. Stiffening wire #2 is introduced on entry of the tip of the colonoscope into the transverse colon.

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Colonoscope stiffening device

Intervention Type DEVICE

"Firm" stiffening wire introduced routinely on entry into transverse colon. If difficulty is encountered (as defined previously), the wire is removed and attempts made to advance the colonoscope without it. Further difficulty requires introduction of the "standard" wire and so on until cecal intubation is achieved or the procedure is abandoned.

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Colonoscope stiffening device

Colonoscopy is performed with the unassisted colonoscope (Olympus CF-100TL). The "standard" stiffening wire is introduced only if there is difficulty advancing the colonoscope and only after the tip has passed the splenic flexure. Difficulty is defined as failure to advance the tip of the scope after 5 minutes of trying. If difficulty is again encountered, the "firm" wire replaces the "standard" wire. Further difficulty requires removal of the firm wire and so on until cecal intubation is achieved or the procedure is abandoned.

Intervention Type DEVICE

Colonoscope stiffening device

"Standard" stiffening wire introduced routinely on entry into transverse colon. If difficulty is encountered (as defined previously), the "standard" wire is removed and attempts made to advance the colonoscope without it. Further difficulty requires introduction of the "firm" wire and so on until cecal intubation is achieved or the procedure is abandoned.

Intervention Type DEVICE

Colonoscope stiffening device

"Firm" stiffening wire introduced routinely on entry into transverse colon. If difficulty is encountered (as defined previously), the wire is removed and attempts made to advance the colonoscope without it. Further difficulty requires introduction of the "standard" wire and so on until cecal intubation is achieved or the procedure is abandoned.

Intervention Type DEVICE

Other Intervention Names

Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.

ZUTR-141700 (Standard) and ZUTR-161700 (Firm) by Zutron Medical ZUTR-141700 (Standard) and ZUTR-161700 (Firm) by Zutron Medical ZUTR-141700 (Standard) and ZUTR-161700 (Firm) by Zutron Medical

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Adults 18 years and older having screening or diagnostic colonoscopy

Exclusion Criteria

* Previous hysterectomy
* Previous radical prostatectomy
* Clinical presentation or imaging study suggesting presence of lesion that could obstruct passage of colonoscope
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

MoBay Hope Medical Center, Jamaica

OTHER

Sponsor Role collaborator

Cornwall Regional Hospital

OTHER_GOV

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Cornwall Regional Hospital

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Jeffrey M East, MD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Cornwall Regional Hospital

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Mobay Hope Medical Center

Montego Bay, Saint James Parish, Jamaica

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Jamaica

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Odori T, Goto H, Arisawa T, Niwa Y, Ohmiya N, Hayakawa T. Clinical results and development of variable-stiffness video colonoscopes. Endoscopy. 2001 Jan;33(1):65-9. doi: 10.1055/s-2001-11174.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 11204990 (View on PubMed)

Shah SG, Saunders BP. Aids to insertion: magnetic imaging, variable stiffness, and overtubes. Gastrointest Endosc Clin N Am. 2005 Oct;15(4):673-86. doi: 10.1016/j.giec.2005.08.011.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 16278132 (View on PubMed)

Sivak MV. Gastroenterologic Endoscopy. Second Edition. W.B. Saunders, 1999.

Reference Type BACKGROUND

Zutron Medical. Colonoscope stiffening device. http://zutronmedical.storesecured.com/items/Endoscope-Stiffening-System/list.htm . 2009. Ref Type: Electronic Citation

Reference Type BACKGROUND

Smith PG, Morrow RH. Field Trials of Health Interventions in Developing Countries: A Toolbox. 2nd ed. London: Macmillan Education, 1996.

Reference Type BACKGROUND

Othman MO, Bradley AG, Choudhary A, Hoffman RM, Roy PK. Variable stiffness colonoscope versus regular adult colonoscope: meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Endoscopy. 2009 Jan;41(1):17-24. doi: 10.1055/s-0028-1103488. Epub 2009 Jan 21.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 19160154 (View on PubMed)

Baron TH. The variable stiffness colonoscope: a scope for all seasons? Am J Gastroenterol. 2002 Dec;97(12):2942-3. doi: 10.1111/j.1572-0241.2002.07091.x. No abstract available.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 12492173 (View on PubMed)

East JM. Effect of a proprietary intraluminal stiffening wire device on cecal intubation time and rate with used colonoscopes; a randomized, controlled trial. BMC Res Notes. 2013 Feb 4;6:48. doi: 10.1186/1756-0500-6-48.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 23379922 (View on PubMed)

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

JE-1

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.