Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
42 participants
OBSERVATIONAL
2008-08-05
2016-09-21
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Healthy subjects between 50 and 80 years of age and healthy subjects 40 years and older who have a family history of colon cancer may be eligible for this study.
Participants undergo colonoscopy a day after self-administering a bowel cleansing preparation. The first part of the procedure is done similarly to that of a flexible sigmoidoscopy, and no sedation or pain medication is used. The colonoscope is inserted into the rectum and advanced about one-third the length of the colon. Pain or discomfort should be mild to moderate cramping and a feeling of having to move the bowels. The subject is asked to score his or her pain level at this point using a standard pain scale. If there is pain, the procedure is stopped and an x-ray is taken to determine if the colonoscope has looped. If it has, the loop is undone and the SSW is used. Another x-ray is then taken to document that the loop has been prevented with the SSW, and the procedure is completed as per standard medical practice. Subjects are taken to the recovery area, informed of the test results and then discharged home in the care of an accompanying adult.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Standard Colonoscopy Versus Colonoscopy With Endocuff Vision
NCT03361917
Cap-fitted Colonoscopy: a Randomized, Tandem Colonoscopy Study of Adenoma Miss Rates
NCT00577083
Effectiveness of Stiffening Wire in Colonoscopy With Pre-Owned Colonoscopes
NCT01115010
Comparison of Colon Adenoma Detection Rate Using Two Distal Colonoscope Attachments
NCT02665741
EndoRings Colonoscopy vs Standard Colonoscopy
NCT03418662
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
OTHER
OTHER
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Phase 1: Single Colonoscopy
Feasibility testing using the segmental stiffening wire
No interventions assigned to this group
Phase 2; Not randomized
Phase 2 participants who did not have looping during first colonoscopy
No interventions assigned to this group
Phase 2: Randomized to SSW during first colonoscopy
Phase 2 participants in whom looping occurred on first biopsy, randomized to subsequent use of segmental stiffening wire, then colonoscopy with no segmental stiffening wire upon repeat colonoscopy the next day.
No interventions assigned to this group
Phase 2: Randomized to SSW during second colonoscopy
Phase 2 participants in whom looping occurred on first biopsy, randomized to no subsequent use of the segmental stiffening wire that day, then colonoscopy with segmental stiffening wire upon repeat colonoscopy the next day.
No interventions assigned to this group
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
Volunteer meets the criteria of Anesthesia Level 1 or 2.
Volunteer agrees to undergo the study procedures.
Exclusion Criteria
Former or current history of alcohol or drug dependency.
History of colonic resection.
Pregnancy.
Age greater than 80 or less than 40.
Prior radiation to the abdomen or pelvis.
American Society of Anesthesiologists Grade 3, 4, or 5.
Allergy or other contraindications to midazolam or fentanyl.
40 Years
80 Years
ALL
Yes
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases (NIDDK)
NIH
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Stephen A Wank, M.D.
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases (NIDDK)
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
National Institutes of Health Clinical Center, 9000 Rockville Pike
Bethesda, Maryland, United States
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Meissner HI, Breen N, Klabunde CN, Vernon SW. Patterns of colorectal cancer screening uptake among men and women in the United States. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2006 Feb;15(2):389-94. doi: 10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-05-0678.
Kahi CJ, Rex DK. Current and future trends in colorectal cancer screening. Cancer Metastasis Rev. 2004 Jan-Jun;23(1-2):137-44. doi: 10.1023/a:1025871231346.
Wu GH, Wang YM, Yen AM, Wong JM, Lai HC, Warwick J, Chen TH. Cost-effectiveness analysis of colorectal cancer screening with stool DNA testing in intermediate-incidence countries. BMC Cancer. 2006 May 24;6:136. doi: 10.1186/1471-2407-6-136.
Related Links
Access external resources that provide additional context or updates about the study.
NIH Clinical Center Detailed Web Page
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
08-DK-0173
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: secondary_id
080173
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.