A Randomized Prospective Trial Comparing Low-volume Bowel Preparation Methods

NCT ID: NCT02250196

Last Updated: 2014-09-26

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

PHASE3

Total Enrollment

200 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2013-03-31

Study Completion Date

2013-11-30

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

Colonoscopy is a common screening method to detect polyps and CRC. With the early detection of CRC through screening colonoscopy, patients could have better therapeutic effects and outcomes. In population screening programs, an increase in completed colonoscopies is related to a decrease in mortality from CRC. However, the miss rate for detecting colorectal neoplastic polyps of colonoscopy is 5-28%. The reluctance of participants to undergo bowel preparation results in the relatively low rate of detection of polyps and CRC, because poor preparation interferes with successful colon mucosa examination during a colonoscopy.

Low-volume bowel preparations provide equivalent cleansing effect compared with standard 4 liter polyethylene glycol. However, studies comparing the superiority between low-volume bowel preparations are rare, and results are controversial. This study aimed to compare the bowel cleansing quality and tolerability between split-dose sodium picosulfate/magnesium citrate and polyethylene glycol with ascorbic acid.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

1. Study design: endoscopist-blinded, prospective, randomized controlled trial
2. Subjects

1. Entry criteria: Male or female patients, aged between18 and 80 years undergoing elective outpatient colonoscopy were eligible for the study.
2. Exclusion criteria:

patients who had chronic kidney disease, severe heart failure(New York Heart Association \[NYHA\] class III or IV), uncontrolled hypertension (systolic pressure ≥170 mm Hg, diastolic pressure ≥100 mm Hg), severe constipation, any bowel resection, significant gastroparesis, or suspected bowel obstruction or perforation.
3. Sampling design: Consecutive recruitment of consenting patients
4. Variables Predictor

1. group 1 (SPMC 2) received one sachet of SPMC at 7 p.m the evening before colonoscopy and another sachet of SPMC at 5 hours before procedure
2. group 2 (PEG-Asc) received 1 L solution of PEG-Asc at 7 p.m the evening before colonoscopy and another 1 L solution of PEG-Asc at 5 hours before procedure;
5. Primary Outcome: Quality of bowel preparation (Boston Bowel Preparation Scale, Aronchick scale, bubble score)
6. Secondary Outcome: Tolerability, palatability

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Colorectal Cancer Colon Adenoma

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

SUPPORTIVE_CARE

Blinding Strategy

SINGLE

Investigators

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

PEG-Asc

group 1 (PEG-Asc, N=100) received 1 L solution of PEG-Asc at 7 p.m the evening before colonoscopy and another 1 L solution of PEG-Asc at 5 hours before procedure

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

PEG-Asc

Intervention Type DRUG

received 1 L solution of PEG-Asc at 7 p.m the evening before colonoscopy and another 1 L solution of PEG-Asc at 5 hours before procedure

SPMC 2

group 2 (SPMC 2, N=100) received one sachet of SPMC at 7 p.m the evening before colonoscopy and another sachet of SPMC at 5 hours before procedure

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

SPMC 2

Intervention Type DRUG

received one sachet of SPMC at 7 p.m the evening before colonoscopy and another sachet of SPMC at 5 hours before procedure

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

PEG-Asc

received 1 L solution of PEG-Asc at 7 p.m the evening before colonoscopy and another 1 L solution of PEG-Asc at 5 hours before procedure

Intervention Type DRUG

SPMC 2

received one sachet of SPMC at 7 p.m the evening before colonoscopy and another sachet of SPMC at 5 hours before procedure

Intervention Type DRUG

Other Intervention Names

Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.

Coolprep®; TaeJoon Pharmaceuticals, Seoul, Korea Picolight(Pharmbio korea, Seoul, Korea)

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Male or female patients, aged between18 and 80 years undergoing elective outpatient colonoscopy were eligible for the study

Exclusion Criteria

* patients who had chronic kidney disease, severe heart failure(New York Heart Association \[NYHA\] class III or IV), uncontrolled hypertension (systolic pressure ≥170 mm Hg, diastolic pressure ≥100 mm Hg), severe constipation, any bowel resection, significant gastroparesis, or suspected bowel obstruction or perforation.
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

80 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Korea University Anam Hospital

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

In-Kyung Yoo

fellow

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Eun Sun Kim, PhD

Role: STUDY_DIRECTOR

Division of Gastroenterology, Department of Internal Medicine, Korea University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea

In Kyung Yoo, MD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Division of Gastroenterology, Department of Internal Medicine, Korea University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Korea University Anam Hospital

Seoul, Anamdong 5-ga, Seongbuk-gu, South Korea

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

South Korea

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

Korea University Prep

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.