A Randomized Prospective Trial Comparing Low-volume Bowel Preparation Methods
NCT ID: NCT02250196
Last Updated: 2014-09-26
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
PHASE3
200 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2013-03-31
2013-11-30
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Low-volume bowel preparations provide equivalent cleansing effect compared with standard 4 liter polyethylene glycol. However, studies comparing the superiority between low-volume bowel preparations are rare, and results are controversial. This study aimed to compare the bowel cleansing quality and tolerability between split-dose sodium picosulfate/magnesium citrate and polyethylene glycol with ascorbic acid.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Comparison of Low-volume PEG Plus Ascorbic Acid Versus Standard PEG Solution as Bowel Cleansing for Colonoscopy
NCT01740518
Bowel Preparation for Colonoscopy in the Elderly
NCT02290093
Effect of Simethicone on Bowel Preparation for Colonoscopy
NCT02548403
Comparison Between a 1L of Polyethylene Glycol+Ascorbic Acid as a Split Dose Bowel Preparation for Colonoscopy
NCT04758156
A Pre-endoscopic Prediction Model for Inadequate Bowel Preparation in Patients Receiving Split Dose Polyethylene Glycol Preparation
NCT02174601
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
2. Subjects
1. Entry criteria: Male or female patients, aged between18 and 80 years undergoing elective outpatient colonoscopy were eligible for the study.
2. Exclusion criteria:
patients who had chronic kidney disease, severe heart failure(New York Heart Association \[NYHA\] class III or IV), uncontrolled hypertension (systolic pressure ≥170 mm Hg, diastolic pressure ≥100 mm Hg), severe constipation, any bowel resection, significant gastroparesis, or suspected bowel obstruction or perforation.
3. Sampling design: Consecutive recruitment of consenting patients
4. Variables Predictor
1. group 1 (SPMC 2) received one sachet of SPMC at 7 p.m the evening before colonoscopy and another sachet of SPMC at 5 hours before procedure
2. group 2 (PEG-Asc) received 1 L solution of PEG-Asc at 7 p.m the evening before colonoscopy and another 1 L solution of PEG-Asc at 5 hours before procedure;
5. Primary Outcome: Quality of bowel preparation (Boston Bowel Preparation Scale, Aronchick scale, bubble score)
6. Secondary Outcome: Tolerability, palatability
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
SUPPORTIVE_CARE
SINGLE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
PEG-Asc
group 1 (PEG-Asc, N=100) received 1 L solution of PEG-Asc at 7 p.m the evening before colonoscopy and another 1 L solution of PEG-Asc at 5 hours before procedure
PEG-Asc
received 1 L solution of PEG-Asc at 7 p.m the evening before colonoscopy and another 1 L solution of PEG-Asc at 5 hours before procedure
SPMC 2
group 2 (SPMC 2, N=100) received one sachet of SPMC at 7 p.m the evening before colonoscopy and another sachet of SPMC at 5 hours before procedure
SPMC 2
received one sachet of SPMC at 7 p.m the evening before colonoscopy and another sachet of SPMC at 5 hours before procedure
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
PEG-Asc
received 1 L solution of PEG-Asc at 7 p.m the evening before colonoscopy and another 1 L solution of PEG-Asc at 5 hours before procedure
SPMC 2
received one sachet of SPMC at 7 p.m the evening before colonoscopy and another sachet of SPMC at 5 hours before procedure
Other Intervention Names
Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
Exclusion Criteria
18 Years
80 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Korea University Anam Hospital
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
In-Kyung Yoo
fellow
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Eun Sun Kim, PhD
Role: STUDY_DIRECTOR
Division of Gastroenterology, Department of Internal Medicine, Korea University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea
In Kyung Yoo, MD
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Division of Gastroenterology, Department of Internal Medicine, Korea University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Korea University Anam Hospital
Seoul, Anamdong 5-ga, Seongbuk-gu, South Korea
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
Korea University Prep
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.