Colonoscopy by Videocapsuls Versus Standard Colonoscopy. Intra-individual Comparison for the Subject With a Medium or High Risk of Colorectal Cancer.

NCT ID: NCT00436514

Last Updated: 2009-07-23

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

550 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2007-04-30

Study Completion Date

2009-07-31

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

Colorectal cancer is one of the most frequent and it prognosis is still serious. In France, diagnosis and screening applicated in numerous departements, and now in a path of generalization to the all country, is based on combination of searching blood into bowel movements (Haemoccult) for the screening of population with medium risk (age between 50 to 74 years old)and colonoscopy for the screening and diagnosis of pre-cancerous lesions for the patients with a high risk.Even if the efficiency of this strategy is proved, searching blood into the bowel movement by Haemoccult is still imperfect (a lot of false negative). Colonoscopy is not an ideal tool for screening. Indeed, its acceptability is not perfect and it constitute an invasive method, with complications, with a compulsory general anesthesia, implicating a high cost. The alternative of a screening method based on a non invasive method is required.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Colorectal Cancer

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

NON_RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

DIAGNOSTIC

Blinding Strategy

NONE

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

diet and absorption of ColoPEG

4l of PEG during 2 days

Intervention Type BEHAVIORAL

Colonoscopy with colic videocapsule

2x 10mg Motilium, 2 Fleet Phospho soda (one is facultative) and 1 dulcolax (facultative)

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Standard colonoscopy

1l of PEG the morning just before colonoscopy

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* age between 18 and 80 years
* patient able to give his informed consent
* No colorectal, intestinal inflammatory, ischemic or evolving infectious pathologies
* No signs of stenosis of small intestine or colon
* No contraindication to anesthesia
* No participation to an other clinical study
* Patient with and indication to colonoscopy for searching of a colorectal neoplasia during a screening program OR
* Patient for who a endoscopic following is required because of familial cases or personal cases of polyps or colorectal cancer

Exclusion Criteria

* Presence of symptoms evocating an occlusive pathology
* Recent complicated colic diverticulosis
* No informed consent
* pregnancy or no use of efficient contraception treatment
* Patient with a pace-maker or others internal medical electronic device
* Evolved nephric or cardiac insufficiencies
* Hypersensibility to Fleet Phospho Soda (or one of the excipient), bisacodyl (or one of the excipient), motilium (or one of the excipient)
* Presence of a prolactinoma
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

80 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Nantes University Hospital

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

CHU de Nantes

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Jean Paul Galmiche, MD

Role: STUDY_DIRECTOR

Nantes University Hospital

Stanislas Chaussade, MD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Hôpital Cochin

Marie-Georges Lapalus, MD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Hospices Civils de Lyon

Christophe Cellier, MD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

CHU Pompidou

Denis Heresbach, MD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Rennes University Hospital

Bernard Filoche, MD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

CH de Saint Philibert

Vincent Maunoury, MD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

CHU de Lille

Gerard Gay, MD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Central Hospital, Nancy, France

Thierry Barrioz, MD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Poitiers University Hospital

Emmanuel Ben Soussan, MD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

University Hospital, Rouen

Dimitri Coumaros, MD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

CHU de Strasbourg

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

CHU de Nantes

Nantes, , France

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

France

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Sacher-Huvelin S, Coron E, Gaudric M, Planche L, Benamouzig R, Maunoury V, Filoche B, Frederic M, Saurin JC, Subtil C, Lecleire S, Cellier C, Coumaros D, Heresbach D, Galmiche JP. Colon capsule endoscopy vs. colonoscopy in patients at average or increased risk of colorectal cancer. Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 2010 Nov;32(9):1145-53. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2036.2010.04458.x. Epub 2010 Sep 16.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 21039676 (View on PubMed)

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

BRD 06/12-L

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

Care for Colon 2015
NCT04049357 COMPLETED NA