Experience and Enhancement: Improving Colonoscopic Polyp Detection

NCT ID: NCT00237276

Last Updated: 2007-09-24

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

UNKNOWN

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

30 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2005-10-31

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

The study looks at 2 hypotheses in 2 patient groups:

1. Are more experienced endoscopists better at detecting subtle lesions (polyps) on the lining of the colon (large bowel) than less experienced endoscopists?
2. Do existing and new techniques that can highlight lesions on the lining of the bowel improve endoscopists ability to spot them? This will be tested using video footage of endoscopies from 2 patient groups: those with a normal colon linig and those with colitis (bowel lining inflamation)

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Colorectal cancer is the second commonest cause of cancer death. In a majority of cases it is preceeded by a precancerous lesion called an adenoma (commonly known as polyp). Patients with colitis are at specially high risk of colorectal cancer which is estimated to be 18% at 30 years of disease. Detection and removal of adenomas at colonoscopy has been shown to reduce the death rate from colorectal cancer. However, despite meticulous examination there is a "miss rate" for adenomas at colonoscopy with ranges from 6-15% in back-to-back colonoscopy studies. The nature of the polyps which as well as being pedunculated (cherry like) can be flat or depressed making them difficult to see and may also contribute to the "miss rate".

The factors that affect whether an endoscopist sees a polyp are not well studied. Polyp detection rates vary widely, even amongst experts. Endoscopist experience is assumed to improve polyp detection rates; however in one study the least experienced endoscopists found the most polyps. Techniques that highlight lesions advanced in recent years. Chromoendoscopy, spraying dye on the bowel lining, has been shown to help pick up more pre-cancerous polyp in one of three studies in normal patients and seems definitely helpful in colitis. Autofluorescence endoscopy and narrow band imaging use light filters to produce a false colour image of the bowel lining where polyps stand out. These techniques have been used with some success in the oesophagus and stomach but little work is available for the colon. High definition endoscopy produces very clear images and may also help in polyp detection.

This study aims to collect videos of colonoscopy when the colonoscope is being removed. This is the main time when polyps are looked for. Some videos will have subtle polyps. The study will re-examine and re-video these areas using one of the techniques which may make polyps stand out better. The aim is to get videos of polyps with and without each of the techniques to highlight the lesions in both normal colon and colitis. These videos will then be shown to endoscopist of differing experience to test if their ability to spot the lesions depends on experience and to see if techniques to make lesions stand out help them see lesions more easily.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Polyps

Keywords

Explore important study keywords that can help with search, categorization, and topic discovery.

colonoscopy, chromoendoscopy, autoflurescence, narrow band imaging, high definition endoscopy, colorectal cancer, colitis, polyp, DALM, adenoma, video

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

NON_RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

CROSSOVER

Primary Study Purpose

DIAGNOSTIC

Blinding Strategy

NONE

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

colonoscopy

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Patients: over 18 years of age, with clinical indication for colonoscopy who are considered by the endoscopist to be fit for the procedure
* Endoscopists who have started colonoscopy training on a recognised training rotation. Consultants who perform colonoscopy regularly

Exclusion Criteria

* patients under 18 years, patients with previous colorectal surgery or known familial polyposis, patients unable to give informed consent, pregnant patients, patients for whom coloscope insertion was difficult or uncomfortable, patients whose colon is not sufficiently cleared of stool, those unwilling to participate
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

London North West Healthcare NHS Trust

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Brian Saunders, MD, FRCP

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

London North West Healthcare NHS Trust

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

North West London Hospitals NHS Trust - St Mark's Hospital

London, , United Kingdom

Site Status RECRUITING

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

United Kingdom

Central Contacts

Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.

Brian Saunders, MD, FRCP

Role: CONTACT

Email: [email protected]

James East, MBChB, MRCP

Role: CONTACT

Phone: 020 8235 4033

Facility Contacts

Find local site contact details for specific facilities participating in the trial.

Alan Warnes, PhD

Role: primary

Iva Hauptmannova, MA

Role: backup

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

05/CL05/70

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id