Comparison of Bowel Cleansing Efficacy Between Same-day Dose Versus Split Dose

NCT ID: NCT03315949

Last Updated: 2020-08-13

Study Results

Results available

Outcome measurements, participant flow, baseline characteristics, and adverse events have been published for this study.

View full results

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

PHASE3

Total Enrollment

352 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2017-05-01

Study Completion Date

2018-02-28

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

Split dose bowel cleansing is recommended method for colonoscopy. For afternoon colonoscopy, same-day dose of bowel cleansing is alternative option. Recently, same-day bowel cleansing for morning colonoscopy was validated. To date, there was no study which compared the bowel cleansing efficacy between same-day dose and split dose regardless of colonoscopy time. The aim of current study is to compare the bowel cleansing efficacy, adverse events, and patient's tolerability between the two group.

Subjects who underwent colonoscopy for various reasons were included. After agreeing to participate in the study, study participants were randomly assigned to split dose or same day dose group. Bowel cleansing is done using polyethylene glycol (PEG). All colonoscopy was done between 10 AM to 6 PM. Study participants were instructed to ingest 500ml PEG every 15 minutes. Subjects who were assigned to split dose group ingested 2L PEG from 9PM 1 day before colonoscopy. Remaining 2L PEG was ingested 3-5 hours before colonoscopy. In the same-day dose group, bowel cleansing was started from 5AM for subjects who were scheduled to receive colonoscopy in the morning. Afternoon colonoscopy group in the same-day dose group ingested 2L PEG from 5AM. Remaining 2L PEG was finished 3-5 hours before colonoscopy.

Bowel cleansing efficacy was assessed using Boston bowel preparation scale. Vital signs and laboratory tests were checked before colonoscopy. Study participants completed questionnaire which contained patient's satisfaction, tolerability, and adverse event during bowel cleansing. Bowel cleansing efficacy, patient's tolerability, and safety profile were compared between the two groups. Successful bowel cleansing was estimated 85% for split dose group.

The investigators set 10% for inferior margin. Considering 10% drop out, a total of 352 subjects will be recruited.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Randomization and blinding:

Randomization will be done using computer generated randomization list. A specialized nurse will explain the method of bowel cleansing. Investigators (endoscopists) are blinded to bowel cleansing method.

Endpoint:

Primary end point is successful bowel cleansing rated by Boston bowel preparation (BBPS) scale. Successful bowel cleansing is defined as all segment is 2 or 3 points. Endoscopists will assess BBPS when colonoscopy withdrawal.

Secondary end point was patient's tolerability and safety profile including adverse events. Patient's satisfaction to the different bowel cleansing method and adverse events (nausea, vomiting, dizziness, fatigue) will be investigated by questionnaire before colonoscopy. Blood test will be done before colonoscopy.

Statistical analysis:

Bowel cleansing success, patient's tolerability and safety profile will be compared between the two groups. Student t test for continuous variables and the chi-square test or Fisher exact test for categorical variables.

Sample size:

This study is non-inferioty study. Assuming bowel cleansing success rate 85% in the split-dose group, the significant difference between the two groups were hypothesized at 10%. Considering 80% power and 10% drop rate, a total of 352 participants is needed.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Unrecognized Condition

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

OTHER

Blinding Strategy

DOUBLE

Investigators Outcome Assessors

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Same-day dose group

Participants who ingest bowel cleanser on the day of colonoscopy. Participant will ingest the 4L PEG on the day of colonoscopy.

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Polyethylene Glycol (PEG)

Intervention Type DRUG

Different method for bowel cleansing using same bowel cleanser. Same-day dose group : 4L PEG will be ingested on the day of colonoscopy Spli-dose group : 2L PEG will be ingested 1 day before colonoscopy, remaining 2L PEG will be ingested on the day of colonoscopy

Split-dose group

Participants who ingest bowel cleanser by split dose. 2L PEG will be ingested 1 day before colonoscopy. Remaining 2L bowel cleanser will be ingested on the day of colonoscopy.

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Polyethylene Glycol (PEG)

Intervention Type DRUG

Different method for bowel cleansing using same bowel cleanser. Same-day dose group : 4L PEG will be ingested on the day of colonoscopy Spli-dose group : 2L PEG will be ingested 1 day before colonoscopy, remaining 2L PEG will be ingested on the day of colonoscopy

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Polyethylene Glycol (PEG)

Different method for bowel cleansing using same bowel cleanser. Same-day dose group : 4L PEG will be ingested on the day of colonoscopy Spli-dose group : 2L PEG will be ingested 1 day before colonoscopy, remaining 2L PEG will be ingested on the day of colonoscopy

Intervention Type DRUG

Other Intervention Names

Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.

colyte

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* all subjects who undergo colonoscopy for various reasons.

Exclusion Criteria

* hemodynamic instability
* ileus or bowel obstruction
* active inflammatory bowel disease
* advanced colon cancer
Minimum Eligible Age

40 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

75 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Incheon St.Mary's Hospital

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Tae-Geun Gweon

Clinical associate professor

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Tae-Geun Gweon, Ph.D

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Professor

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Incheon St. Mary's Hospital

Incheon, , South Korea

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

South Korea

Provided Documents

Download supplemental materials such as informed consent forms, study protocols, or participant manuals.

Document Type: Study Protocol and Statistical Analysis Plan

View Document

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

OC17MESI0060

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.