Safety and Efficacy of Low-volume Preparation in the Elderly: Oral Sulfate Solution

NCT ID: NCT03112967

Last Updated: 2017-08-16

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

193 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2017-04-20

Study Completion Date

2017-08-13

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

The investigators will investigate the safety and efficacy of low-volume preparation (Oral Sulfate solution) compared to 4L PEG solution in bowel preparation before colonoscopy.

One aim of this study was to investigate the efficacy of low-volume preparation (Oral Sulfate solution) on bowel preparation before colonoscopy.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Traditionally, polyethylene glycol (PEG) solution, which requires ingestion of a large volume of liquid, has been used and now to a low-volume preparations because of its clear advantages in tolerability. The tolerability of bowel preparations is related to their volume, taste, and side effects, with this being a particular problem in the elderly. Meanwhile, a new oral sulfate solution (OSS, SUPREP, Braintree Laboratories, Braintree, Mass) formulation as an effective low-volume bowel cleansing agent, with a split-dose regimen was recently developed in 2009.

Concerned about being able to better complete ingestion of bowel cleansing agent, OSS with lower volume and improved taste features, as long as it does not sacrifice safety, shuld be a better choice than PEG. Many studies have already looked at the efficacy and safety of OSS compared to PEG in average risk population, but there are no data available in solely at the elderly population. In this context, we hypothesized that OSS could be a good alternative to a standard 4L-PEG solution in elderly patients.

In this report, we describe a multicenter, prospective, investigator-blind, randomized, controlled trial investigating OSS with 4L PEG for efficacy and safety in the elderly.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Bowel Preparation

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

OTHER

Blinding Strategy

SINGLE

Investigators

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

OSS(Suprep)

Oral Sulfate solution (Suprep) in day before and split-dose regimens In the OSS arm: between 17:00 and 18:00 hours on the day before colonoscopy, subjects were instructed to pour one 180-ml bottle of the study medication into a provided 480-ml mixing cup and fill it with water and then drink the entire volume, followed by two additional 480 ml of water. At approximately 6:00 a.m. on the following morning, the subjects took the second dose of OSS by same formulation protocol.

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

low-volume preparation, oral sulfate solution

Intervention Type OTHER

Oral Sulfate solution (Suprep) in day before and split-dose regimens In the OSS arm: between 17:00 and 18:00 hours on the day before colonoscopy, subjects were instructed to pour one 180-ml bottle of the study medication into a provided 480-ml mixing cup and fill it with water and then drink the entire volume, followed by two additional 480 ml of water. At approximately 6:00 a.m. on the following morning, the subjects took the second dose of OSS by same formulation protocol.

4L PEG solution(Colyte)

4L PEG solution in day before and split-dose regimens In the 4L PEG arm: subjects had the first 2L between 18:00 and 19:00 hours (250mL every 15 minutes) in the evening before the colonoscopy. And the second 2L was given between 07:00 and 08:00 on the day of colonoscopy.

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

large-volume preparation, 4L polyethylene glycol

Intervention Type OTHER

4L PEG solution in day before and split-dose regimens In the 4L PEG arm: subjects had the first 2L between 18:00 and 19:00 hours (250mL every 15 minutes) in the evening before the colonoscopy. And the second 2L was given between 07:00 and 08:00 on the day of colonoscopy.

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

low-volume preparation, oral sulfate solution

Oral Sulfate solution (Suprep) in day before and split-dose regimens In the OSS arm: between 17:00 and 18:00 hours on the day before colonoscopy, subjects were instructed to pour one 180-ml bottle of the study medication into a provided 480-ml mixing cup and fill it with water and then drink the entire volume, followed by two additional 480 ml of water. At approximately 6:00 a.m. on the following morning, the subjects took the second dose of OSS by same formulation protocol.

Intervention Type OTHER

large-volume preparation, 4L polyethylene glycol

4L PEG solution in day before and split-dose regimens In the 4L PEG arm: subjects had the first 2L between 18:00 and 19:00 hours (250mL every 15 minutes) in the evening before the colonoscopy. And the second 2L was given between 07:00 and 08:00 on the day of colonoscopy.

Intervention Type OTHER

Other Intervention Names

Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.

Suprep Colyte

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

All participants from 65 to 75 age

Exclusion Criteria

1. Underwent Colorectal surgery
2. CHF, Acute MI \<6 months
3. ASA class III =\<
4. LC, CRF, Ascite, IBD, or Severe inflammatory state
5. Severe constipation (Bowel movement 3/wk \> or Taking stool softener)
6. Disabled person physically or mentally
7. Refuse consent
Minimum Eligible Age

65 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

75 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Kyung Hee University Hospital at Gangdong

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Min Seob Kwak

Clinical associate professor

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Min Seob Kwak, MD,PhD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

KyungHee university hospital at Gangdong

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Department of Internal Medicine, Kyung Hee University College of Medicine

Seoul, , South Korea

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

South Korea

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Kwak MS, Cha JM, Yang HJ, Park DI, Kim KO, Lee J, Shin JE, Joo YE, Park J, Byeon JS, Kim HG. Safety and Efficacy of Low-Volume Preparation in the Elderly: Oral Sulfate Solution on the Day before and Split-Dose Regimens (SEE SAFE) Study. Gut Liver. 2019 Mar 15;13(2):176-182. doi: 10.5009/gnl18214.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 30400725 (View on PubMed)

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

2016-03-021

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.