Bowel Preparation Regimen for Colon Capsule Endoscopy Procedure

NCT ID: NCT05726097

Last Updated: 2024-02-28

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

PHASE3

Total Enrollment

147 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2023-02-01

Study Completion Date

2023-10-31

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

The study aims to investigate the effect of the optimized bowel preparation and boost regimens on colon capsule endoscopy procedures, specifically on cleanliness and completion rate.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Colon capsule endoscopy (CCE) is a promising modality for lower gastrointestinal (GI) investigations in clinical routine and screening. Furthermore, the double-headed camera capsules are being applied for panenteric investigations, with promising results. The major limitation to its use has been finding a bowel preparation that will clean the colon adequately for good visualization of the mucosa and help propel the capsule using boosters through the colon. To achieve wider CCE adoption, challenges regarding completion rates (CR) and adequate cleanliness rates (ACR) must be handled. CR and ACR should be improved to meet the standards for optical colonoscopy (OC) from the European Society of GI Endoscopy (ESGE). ESGE recommends both CR and ACR ≥ 90%. Recently, a meta-analysis of preparation regimens for CCE confirmed that CR and ACR were suboptimal.

This study is designed to investigate the CR, ACR, and diagnostic yield (DY) of very low-volume polyethylene glycol (PEG) - based laxative compared to a conventional high-volume laxative and the use of different boosters.

All consecutive patients referred for colon capsule endoscopy will be enrolled in the study. PillCam® Crohn's capsule will be used. Patients will undergo a split-dose bowel preparation with a very low-volume PEG-based laxative. In the study arm nr1 gastrografin and magnesiumoxid + sodium picosulfate will be used. In the study arm Nr 2, the same regimen will be used but completed with 2 mg of prucalopride before ingesting the capsule. The results of the study arms will be compared to the previously used standard regimen with 4 L of PEG as a laxative and sodium phosphate as a booster.

The images from the colon capsule will be reviewed, and the quality of bowel preparation (cleanliness rates) and completion rate will be evaluated. Patient tolerance of the bowel preparations and diagnostic yield of colon capsule endoscopy using the different preparation regimens will also be evaluated.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Colon Cancer Inflammatory Bowel Diseases Gastrointestinal Bleed Colon Polyp

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

NON_RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

SEQUENTIAL

Primary Study Purpose

DIAGNOSTIC

Blinding Strategy

SINGLE

Outcome Assessors

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Standard preparation regimen

4 L polyethylene glycol as laxative 30 + 15 mL sodium phosphate as a booster

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

polyethylene glycol

Intervention Type DRUG

colonic preparation

sodium phosphate

Intervention Type DRUG

colonic preparation

Optimized preparation regimen

1 L polyethylene glycol + ascorbic acid as laxative and gastrografin and magnesiumoxid + sodium picosulfate as a booster

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

polyethylene glycol + ascorbic acid

Intervention Type DRUG

colonic preparation

gastrografin

Intervention Type DRUG

colonic preparation

magnesiumoxid + sodium picosulfate

Intervention Type DRUG

colonic preparation

Optimized preparation regimen with prucalopride

1 L polyethylene glycol + ascorbic acid as laxative and gastrografin and magnesiumoxid + sodium picosulfate as a booster + 2 mg of prucalopride

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

polyethylene glycol + ascorbic acid

Intervention Type DRUG

colonic preparation

gastrografin

Intervention Type DRUG

colonic preparation

magnesiumoxid + sodium picosulfate

Intervention Type DRUG

colonic preparation

prucalopride

Intervention Type DRUG

colonic preparation

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

polyethylene glycol

colonic preparation

Intervention Type DRUG

sodium phosphate

colonic preparation

Intervention Type DRUG

polyethylene glycol + ascorbic acid

colonic preparation

Intervention Type DRUG

gastrografin

colonic preparation

Intervention Type DRUG

magnesiumoxid + sodium picosulfate

colonic preparation

Intervention Type DRUG

prucalopride

colonic preparation

Intervention Type DRUG

Other Intervention Names

Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.

Laxabon Phosphoral Plenvu Picoprep Resolol

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Subject referred for clinical colon/panenteric examination
* Subject received an explanation about the nature of the study and agreed to provide written informed consent

Exclusion Criteria

* Subject with dysphagia or any swallowing disorder
* Subject with a prior stomach, small bowel, or colonic resection
* Subject with severe renal insufficiency
* Subject with any allergy or other known contraindication to the medications used in the study
* Women who are either pregnant or nursing
* Subject suffers from life threatening conditions
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Lund University

OTHER

Sponsor Role collaborator

Odense University Hospital

OTHER

Sponsor Role collaborator

Region Skane

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Ervin Toth, MD PhD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Department of Gastroenterology, Skåne University Hospital, Malmö, Lund University, Sweden

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Skåne University Hospital

Malmo, , Sweden

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Sweden

Provided Documents

Download supplemental materials such as informed consent forms, study protocols, or participant manuals.

Document Type: Study Protocol, Statistical Analysis Plan, and Informed Consent Form

View Document

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

2022-06303-02

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.