Bowel Preparation Regimen for Colon Capsule Endoscopy Procedure
NCT ID: NCT05726097
Last Updated: 2024-02-28
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
PHASE3
147 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2023-02-01
2023-10-31
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Different Bowel Preparations in Magnetically Controlled Capsule Endoscopy
NCT06313242
Assessment of Combined Bowel Preparation for Capsule Endoscopy Study
NCT01243736
Optimization of the Bowel Preparation Regimen for the PillCam® COLON 2 Capsule Endoscopy Procedure
NCT02481219
Bowel Preparation Before Colonoscopy
NCT00675324
Free-residue Nutrients for the Bowel Preparation of Colon Capsule Endoscopy
NCT02887573
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
This study is designed to investigate the CR, ACR, and diagnostic yield (DY) of very low-volume polyethylene glycol (PEG) - based laxative compared to a conventional high-volume laxative and the use of different boosters.
All consecutive patients referred for colon capsule endoscopy will be enrolled in the study. PillCam® Crohn's capsule will be used. Patients will undergo a split-dose bowel preparation with a very low-volume PEG-based laxative. In the study arm nr1 gastrografin and magnesiumoxid + sodium picosulfate will be used. In the study arm Nr 2, the same regimen will be used but completed with 2 mg of prucalopride before ingesting the capsule. The results of the study arms will be compared to the previously used standard regimen with 4 L of PEG as a laxative and sodium phosphate as a booster.
The images from the colon capsule will be reviewed, and the quality of bowel preparation (cleanliness rates) and completion rate will be evaluated. Patient tolerance of the bowel preparations and diagnostic yield of colon capsule endoscopy using the different preparation regimens will also be evaluated.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
NON_RANDOMIZED
SEQUENTIAL
DIAGNOSTIC
SINGLE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Standard preparation regimen
4 L polyethylene glycol as laxative 30 + 15 mL sodium phosphate as a booster
polyethylene glycol
colonic preparation
sodium phosphate
colonic preparation
Optimized preparation regimen
1 L polyethylene glycol + ascorbic acid as laxative and gastrografin and magnesiumoxid + sodium picosulfate as a booster
polyethylene glycol + ascorbic acid
colonic preparation
gastrografin
colonic preparation
magnesiumoxid + sodium picosulfate
colonic preparation
Optimized preparation regimen with prucalopride
1 L polyethylene glycol + ascorbic acid as laxative and gastrografin and magnesiumoxid + sodium picosulfate as a booster + 2 mg of prucalopride
polyethylene glycol + ascorbic acid
colonic preparation
gastrografin
colonic preparation
magnesiumoxid + sodium picosulfate
colonic preparation
prucalopride
colonic preparation
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
polyethylene glycol
colonic preparation
sodium phosphate
colonic preparation
polyethylene glycol + ascorbic acid
colonic preparation
gastrografin
colonic preparation
magnesiumoxid + sodium picosulfate
colonic preparation
prucalopride
colonic preparation
Other Intervention Names
Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* Subject received an explanation about the nature of the study and agreed to provide written informed consent
Exclusion Criteria
* Subject with a prior stomach, small bowel, or colonic resection
* Subject with severe renal insufficiency
* Subject with any allergy or other known contraindication to the medications used in the study
* Women who are either pregnant or nursing
* Subject suffers from life threatening conditions
18 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Lund University
OTHER
Odense University Hospital
OTHER
Region Skane
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Ervin Toth, MD PhD
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Department of Gastroenterology, Skåne University Hospital, Malmö, Lund University, Sweden
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Skåne University Hospital
Malmo, , Sweden
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Provided Documents
Download supplemental materials such as informed consent forms, study protocols, or participant manuals.
Document Type: Study Protocol, Statistical Analysis Plan, and Informed Consent Form
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
2022-06303-02
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.