Motorized Spiral Colonoscopy Trial: A First Feasibility Trial
NCT ID: NCT03000361
Last Updated: 2017-08-01
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
NA
30 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2016-12-31
2017-02-01
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Does Inspection of Colonic Mucosa During Insertion Improve Adenoma Detection?
NCT03254030
Colonoscopy Using Motorized Spiral Enteroscope
NCT04895254
Does Inspection During Insertion Improve Adenoma Yields During Colonoscopy?
NCT01035775
The Impact of Split Dose of Low-volume Polyethylene Glycol on Adenoma Detection Rate
NCT02178033
Colon Capsule Endoscopy (CCE) Versus Computed Tomographic Colonography (CTC) in the Identification of Colonic Polyps in a Screening Population.
NCT02754661
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Quality parameters for colonoscopy were recently reported. In terms of intraprocedural indicators a cecal intubation rate of ≥ 90% for all cases of colonoscopy is widely accepted. Even experienced endoscopists classify up to 10% of colonoscopies as difficult and intubation of the cecum may then be impossible. A recent study evaluated the efficacy and safety of repeating colonoscopy in 520 patients with prior incomplete colonoscopy. Reasons for failure to complete colonoscopy in referring institutions were "looping/redundant colon" in 53.8% of the cases, "sigmoid fixation/angulation" in 38.8%, "both sigmoid angulation and looping colon" in 5.8% of the cases. Issues with sedation caused failures in 1.5% of the patients. Conventional colonoscopy can be difficult in particular in these anatomical variations because pushing the endoscope tends to form loops with limited or no advancement of the tip of the instrument. Techniques like alternating pushing and pulling the endoscope or external compression of the abdomen are used to overcome these limitations. Loop formation and stretching the colon with the adjacent mesenterium as well as external compression are inconvenient or even painful for the patient. In addition these maneuvers prolong the procedural duration. We recently compared the use of ultrathin colonoscopies with standard colonoscope in a randomized trial in terms of cecal intubation rate, level of sedation, amount of propofol needed for sedation, number of external compressions, pain score patient satisfaction and other parameters. The results indicate that these parameters can be well used for evaluation of a new technique of colonoscopy.
Spiral assisted endoscopy is based on a completely different concept of advancing an endoscope by pleating of bowel on the instrumentation shaft by rotation. This technique has been widely used for antegrade enteroscopy. For this purpose a manually rotatable overtube is used through which a thin flexible enteroscope is inserted. The distal end of the overtube contains a raised spiral thread for pleating the small intestine over the overtube. By manually rotating the spiral element the bowel pleats onto the overtube, allowing the operator to access and visualize the more distal portions of the small intestine. Spiral assisted endoscopy has been also approved and evaluated for retrograde enteroscopy via the anal route. It promises advantage for intubation of the cecum and the terminal ileum by its principle of pleating at least parts of the colon with consecutive shortening and less loop formation. These effects should reduce the need for external compression and they may cause less pain for patients. In addition, the spiral should stabilize the position of the colonoscope which is advantageous for careful examination and targeted interventions. Spiral overtube-assisted colonoscopy achieved a success rate of cecal intubation in 92% of 24 patients in whom conventional colonoscopy had failed. However conventional spiral endoscopy is cumbersome to use and requires assistance by a second endoscopist for its appropriate use.
The Novel Motorized Spiral Endoscope represents a new technology which offers all of the advantageous options of spiral-assisted endoscopy with a faster and less invasive approach. The system is similar to other currently marketed endoscopes in that it incorporates a flexible insertion tube, light source, digital imaging, and channels for passing accessories for sample collection or therapeutic interventions. The system is unique in that it incorporates a user-controlled motor contained in the endoscope's handle to rotate a spiral cuff located on the endoscope's insertion tube. Rotation of this cuff, which has soft spiral-shaped "fins", pleats the colon on to the endoscope's insertion tube, thereby allowing rapid and atraumatic access into the colon. The system also includes a display monitor, a motor control unit, device to display measured motor current and signal torque, and a set of foot pedals. It is currently being evaluated in a prospective study in patients with indications for antegrade enteroscopy ("European Novel Motorized Spiral Endoscopy Trial (ENMSET)) in the two centers conducting this study. So far more than 60 patients were successfully examined without major adverse events.
The aim of this study is to assess the feasibility and the safety of the Novel Motorized Spiral Endoscope to examine the colon. The study is conceived as proof of concept trial with the primary aim to achieve a cecal intubation rate of at least 90 % according to quality guidelines recommendations. All other clinically relevant quality parameters of standard colonoscopy will be evaluated as secondary aims comparable to our recent trial. This study represents the first clinical evaluation of using a motorized spiral assisted endoscope for examination of the colon with potential advantages for patients in terms of effectiveness and convenience of colonoscopy.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
NA
SINGLE_GROUP
TREATMENT
NONE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Motorized Spiral Colonoscopy
Motorized Spiral Colonoscopy (MSC) with the novel motorized spiral endoscope represents a new technology which offers all of the advantageous options of spiral-assisted endoscopy with a faster and less invasive approach
Motorized Spiral Colonoscopy
For any pathological finding during colonoscopy standard endoscopic techniques, e.g. forceps biopsy, injection, endoscopic mucosal resection, argon plasma coagulation
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Motorized Spiral Colonoscopy
For any pathological finding during colonoscopy standard endoscopic techniques, e.g. forceps biopsy, injection, endoscopic mucosal resection, argon plasma coagulation
Other Intervention Names
Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* Surveillance after previous polypectomy/endoscopic mucosal resection (EMR)
* Positive results on colorectal cancer (CRC) screening tests
* Evaluation of clinical symptoms of non overt gastrointestinal bleeding
* Indeterminate iron-deficiency anaemia
* Chronic diarrhoea
* Indeterminate large-bowel symptoms requiring evaluation for colorectal disease
Exclusion Criteria
* Health status American Society of Anesthesiologists classification (ASA) level ≥ 3
* Pregnancy
* Known coagulopathy (INR≥2.0, Platelets \< 70/nl)
* Anti-platelet agents or anticoagulants (other than aspirin) within last 7 days
* History of chronic inflammatory bowel disease
* Previously identified colorectal polyps/lesions with indication for endoscopic resection
* Any medical contraindication to standard colonoscopy
* Any prior abdominal surgery of the mid or lower gastrointestinal tract (except uncomplicated appendectomy)
* Known or suspected bowel obstruction or stenosis
* Known hemorrhoids 3rd degree
* Suspected perforation of the GI tract
* Inability to tolerate sedation for any reason
* Absence of a signed informed consent
18 Years
ALL
Yes
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Olympus
INDUSTRY
Evangelisches Krankenhaus Düsseldorf
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Horst Neuhaus, MD, PhD
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Evangelisches Krankenhaus Duesseldorf, Germany
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Evangelisches Krankenhaus
Düsseldorf, , Germany
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Beyna T, Schneider M, Pullmann D, Gerges C, Kandler J, Neuhaus H. Motorized spiral colonoscopy: a first single-center feasibility trial. Endoscopy. 2018 May;50(5):518-523. doi: 10.1055/s-0043-123577. Epub 2017 Dec 18.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
MSCT
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.