RCT of Air Insufflation Versus Water Infusion Colonoscopy by Supervised Trainees
NCT ID: NCT00841282
Last Updated: 2009-02-11
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
NA
62 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2008-10-31
2009-02-28
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
RCT of Air Insufflation Versus Water Infusion Colonoscopy
NCT00785889
Comparison of on Demand Sedation With Study Method Versus on Demand Sedation With Conventional Method for Performing Colonoscopy for Colorectal Cancer Screening and Surveillance
NCT00920751
Unsedated Colonoscopy for Colorectal Cancer Screening and Surveillance
NCT01383252
Randomized Controlled Trial Comparing Water vs. Air Method for Performing Colonoscopy in Adult Female Subjects
NCT01790425
Water Injection Colonoscopy vs Air Insufflation Colonoscopy in Experienced Endoscopists
NCT01797406
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Aim: To perform a randomized controlled trial comparing air insufflation (conventional method) vs. water infusion in lieu of air (study method) colonoscopy in minimally sedated patients by supervised trainees.
Hypothesis: Compared with the conventional method, patients examined by the study method have lower pain scores and require less medication but have similar cecal intubation rate and willingness to repeat future colonoscopy.
Setting: Outpatient colonoscopy in a single VA hospital Methods: After informed consent and standard bowel preparation, patients received pre-medications administered as 0.5 increment of Fentanyl (25 μg) and 0.5 increment of Versed (1 mg) plus 50 mg Diphenhydramine. The conventional and the study method for colonoscopy were implemented as previously described. Additional pain medications were administered at the patients' request.
Outcome measures: Increments of medications, pain scores, cecal intubation and willingness to repeat colonoscopy.
Limitations: Single VA site, older male population
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
SINGLE_GROUP
TREATMENT
SINGLE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
1
Water Infusion in lieu of Air Insufflation Colonoscopy
Colonoscopy for colorectal cancer screening
Water Infusion Colonoscopy
water infusion in lieu of air insufflation for screening colonoscopy
2
Air Insufflation Colonoscopy
Colonoscopy for colorectal cancer screening
Air insufflation colonoscopy
Conventional colonoscopy with air insufflation
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Colonoscopy for colorectal cancer screening
Water Infusion Colonoscopy
water infusion in lieu of air insufflation for screening colonoscopy
Air insufflation colonoscopy
Conventional colonoscopy with air insufflation
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* Accept randomization to the study or the conventional method, and agree to complete study questionnaires
* The adults will be normal healthy patients or patients with mild systemic disease, ASA 1 or ASA 2
Exclusion Criteria
* Excluded patients will be managed by usual procedures
50 Years
80 Years
ALL
Yes
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
East Bay Institute for Research and Education
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Section of Gastroenterology, Sacramento VA Medical Center
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Sacramento VA Medical Center,
Mather, California, United States
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
EBIRE-GI-002
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.