RCT of Air Insufflation Versus Water Infusion Colonoscopy by Supervised Trainees

NCT ID: NCT00841282

Last Updated: 2009-02-11

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

62 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2008-10-31

Study Completion Date

2009-02-28

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

Our aim is to perform a randomized-controlled trial comparing air insufflation sedated colonoscopy (conventional method) vs. water infusion sedated colonoscopy (study method) by supervised trainees. Randomized trials demonstrating reduced need for sedation medications without compromising patients' comfort, cecal intubation rates or polyps detection may cause a paradigm shift and positively alter the way traditional colonoscopy is performed and future endoscopists are trained.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Background: A novel water method permitted 52% of patients accepting on-demand sedation to complete colonoscopy without medications and significantly increased successful cecal intubation from 76% to 97% in patients accepting scheduled unsedated colonoscopy.

Aim: To perform a randomized controlled trial comparing air insufflation (conventional method) vs. water infusion in lieu of air (study method) colonoscopy in minimally sedated patients by supervised trainees.

Hypothesis: Compared with the conventional method, patients examined by the study method have lower pain scores and require less medication but have similar cecal intubation rate and willingness to repeat future colonoscopy.

Setting: Outpatient colonoscopy in a single VA hospital Methods: After informed consent and standard bowel preparation, patients received pre-medications administered as 0.5 increment of Fentanyl (25 μg) and 0.5 increment of Versed (1 mg) plus 50 mg Diphenhydramine. The conventional and the study method for colonoscopy were implemented as previously described. Additional pain medications were administered at the patients' request.

Outcome measures: Increments of medications, pain scores, cecal intubation and willingness to repeat colonoscopy.

Limitations: Single VA site, older male population

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Colorectal Cancer

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

SINGLE_GROUP

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

SINGLE

Participants

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

1

Water Infusion in lieu of Air Insufflation Colonoscopy

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Colonoscopy for colorectal cancer screening

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Water Infusion Colonoscopy

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

water infusion in lieu of air insufflation for screening colonoscopy

2

Air Insufflation Colonoscopy

Group Type PLACEBO_COMPARATOR

Colonoscopy for colorectal cancer screening

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Air insufflation colonoscopy

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Conventional colonoscopy with air insufflation

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Colonoscopy for colorectal cancer screening

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Water Infusion Colonoscopy

water infusion in lieu of air insufflation for screening colonoscopy

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Air insufflation colonoscopy

Conventional colonoscopy with air insufflation

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Adult (\> 50 years old) male and female patients who are scheduled and consented for screening or surveillance colonoscopy,
* Accept randomization to the study or the conventional method, and agree to complete study questionnaires
* The adults will be normal healthy patients or patients with mild systemic disease, ASA 1 or ASA 2

Exclusion Criteria

* Patients who have contraindications for sedation, decline to participate, unable to give informed consent or complete the questionnaires due to language or other difficulties will be excluded
* Excluded patients will be managed by usual procedures
Minimum Eligible Age

50 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

80 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

East Bay Institute for Research and Education

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Section of Gastroenterology, Sacramento VA Medical Center

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Sacramento VA Medical Center,

Mather, California, United States

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

United States

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

EBIRE-GI-002

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

Warm Water and Unsedated Colonoscopy
NCT01463319 COMPLETED EARLY_PHASE1