Unsedated Colonoscopy for Colorectal Cancer Screening and Surveillance
NCT ID: NCT01383252
Last Updated: 2013-06-17
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
NA
10 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2010-02-28
2013-06-30
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
1. Study method increases overall cecal intubation with comparable assessment of current experience and patient willingness to repeat future colonoscopy compared with conventional colonoscopy
2. Study method improves bowel preparation and increases polyp pickup rate
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
RCT of Air Insufflation Versus Water Infusion Colonoscopy by Supervised Trainees
NCT00841282
Comparison of on Demand Sedation With Study Method Versus on Demand Sedation With Conventional Method for Performing Colonoscopy for Colorectal Cancer Screening and Surveillance
NCT00920751
RCT of Air Insufflation Versus Water Infusion Colonoscopy
NCT00785889
A Comparison of Air Insufflation, Water Immersion and Water Exchange Colonoscopy in CRC Screening
NCT01780818
Randomized Controlled Trial Comparing Water vs. Air Method for Performing Colonoscopy in Adult Female Subjects
NCT01790425
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
The demand for colonoscopy far exceeds the capacity available to perform the procedure in the VA system. The conventional practice for colonoscopy at VA facilities across the country is to perform colonoscopy under conscious sedation with air insufflation. Efficiency is governed by the fact that sedated patients require time and space for recovery and these are major limiting factors in the current setting for the use of colonoscopy for CRC screening.
In a prospective, randomized, controlled trial (RCT), two methods of performing colonoscopy will be compared in patients undergoing unsedated colonoscopy for CRC screening. We compared the water infusion in lieu of air insufflation (water method) with the conventional air insufflation method. We hypothesize that the water method (Study method) increases overall cecal intubation with comparable assessment of current experience and patient willingness to repeat future colonoscopy compared with conventional colonoscopy. In addition, the water method improves bowel preparation and increases polyp pickup rate.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
SINGLE_GROUP
SCREENING
SINGLE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Water method
Water infusion in lieu of air insufflation for screening and surveillance colonoscopy
Water infusion in lieu of air insufflation
Air pump is turned off, water is infused using a peristaltic pump to aid colonoscope insertion until the cecum is reached. Air pockets and dirty water are suctioned before clean water is infused (exchange) to facilitate scope insertion.
Air method
Air insufflation for screening and surveillance colonoscopy
Air method
Conventional air method with minimal insufflation of air to aid scope insertion until the cecum is reached. Water in aliquots will be used for irrigation and cleansing.
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Water infusion in lieu of air insufflation
Air pump is turned off, water is infused using a peristaltic pump to aid colonoscope insertion until the cecum is reached. Air pockets and dirty water are suctioned before clean water is infused (exchange) to facilitate scope insertion.
Air method
Conventional air method with minimal insufflation of air to aid scope insertion until the cecum is reached. Water in aliquots will be used for irrigation and cleansing.
Other Intervention Names
Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* Male and female patients
* Scheduled and consented for screening or surveillance colonoscopy without medications
* Accept randomization to the study or the conventional method
* Agree to complete study questionnaires
* The adults will be normal healthy patients or patients with mild systemic disease, ASA 1 or ASA 2.
Exclusion Criteria
* Unable to give informed consent or complete the questionnaires due to language or other difficulties
50 Years
75 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
VA Northern California Health Care System
FED
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Joseph Leung, MD
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Sacramento VA Medical Center
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Sacramento VA Medical Center
Mather, California, United States
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Leung JW, Mann SK, Siao-Salera R, Ransibrahmanakul K, Lim B, Cabrera H, Canete W, Barredo P, Gutierrez R, Leung FW. A randomized, controlled comparison of warm water infusion in lieu of air insufflation versus air insufflation for aiding colonoscopy insertion in sedated patients undergoing colorectal cancer screening and surveillance. Gastrointest Endosc. 2009 Sep;70(3):505-10. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2008.12.253. Epub 2009 Jun 24.
Leung JW, Mann S, Leung FW. Options for screening colonoscopy without sedation: a pilot study in United States veterans. Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 2007 Aug 15;26(4):627-31. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2036.2007.03404.x.
Leung FW, Mann SK, Salera R, Toomsen L, Cabrera H, Prather D, Gutierrez R, Leung JW. Options for screening colonoscopy without sedation: sequel to a pilot study in U.S. veterans. Gastrointest Endosc. 2008 Apr;67(4):712-7. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2007.10.028. Epub 2008 Feb 14.
Leung JW, Salera R, Toomsen L, Mann S, Leung FW. Pilot feasibility study of the method of water infusion without air insufflation in sedated colonoscopy. Dig Dis Sci. 2009 Sep;54(9):1997-2001. doi: 10.1007/s10620-008-0576-4. Epub 2008 Dec 5.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
VANCHCS-GI-005
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.