Comparison of Methods to Distend the Colon During Insertion: CO2, Air Insufflation, Water-aided Colonoscopy

NCT ID: NCT01954862

Last Updated: 2014-07-31

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

624 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2013-10-31

Study Completion Date

2014-07-31

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

Insufflation of the colon, usually with room air, is necessary to distend the lumen for exploration. Carbon dioxide (CO2) insufflation instead of room air insufflation (AI) has been shown to decrease symptoms of abdominal pain or discomfort during the procedure and particularly during the following 24 hours. CO2 is is rapidly absorbed by the intestinal mucosa and exhaled through respiration. AI colonoscopy has usually been the reference standard to compare colonoscopy using CO2 insufflation. In two recent articles AI was compared to either CO2 insufflation and Water-aided colonoscopy (WAC), which entails infusion of water to facilitate insertion to the cecum.

WAC can be categorized broadly in Water Immersion (WI) and Water Exchange (WE). In WI water is infused during the insertion phase of colonoscopy, with removal of infused water predominantly during withdrawal. Occasional use of insufflation may be allowed. WE entails complete exclusion of insufflation, removal of residual colonic air pockets and feces, and suction of infused water predominantly during insertion to minimize distention. During the withdrawal phase insufflation is used to distend the colonic lumen.

In the WAC arms of the two mentioned articles the insertion method used was WI, with infusion of water at room temperature or at 37°C. During withdrawal, air insufflation or either air or CO2 insufflation were employed.

Compared to AI, CO2 insufflation and WI (using room air insufflation or CO2 insufflation during withdrawal) were effective in both studies in decreasing sedation requirement, pain and tolerance scores, with patients' higher willingness to repeat the procedure.

Until now no direct comparison has been made within a single study about pain score during colonoscopy using AI, CO2 insufflation, WI/CO2, WE/CO2, WI/AI and WE/AI.

In this study we test the hypothesis that, compared to AI, CO2 insufflation and WAC/CO2-AI methods will decrease pain score during colonoscopy, with reduction of sedation requirement, and that WE will achieve the best result. This comparative study has also the aim to test the respective peculiarities of each method.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Design: Prospective double blinded two-center randomized controlled trial. Methods: Colonoscopy with air insufflation, CO2, Water Immersion/CO2, Water Exchange/CO2, Water Immersion/AI and Water Exchange/AI to aid insertion of colonoscope; split dose bowel preparation; on demand-sedation.

Control method: Air insufflation colonoscopy. Study methods: CO2 colonoscopy, Water Immersion/CO2 colonoscopy, Water Exchange/CO2 colonoscopy, Water Immersion/AI colonoscopy, Water Exchange/AI colonoscopy.

Population: Consecutive 18 to 85 year-old diagnostic in-patients and outpatients. After informed consent, assignment to control or study arms based on computer generated randomization list with block allocation and stratification.

Primary outcome: Maximum pain score recorded during colonoscopy. Secondary outcomes: Cecal intubation rate and time, total procedure time (including biopsy and/or polypectomy), need for sedation and its dosage, overall pain score at discharge. In addition, Adenoma Detection Rate, Mean Adenomas per Procedure, position changes, amount of infused and suctioned water during insertion and withdrawal will be recorded. Bloating after examination and at discharge and patient willingness to repeat the examination will be evaluated.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Pain Colorectal Adenomas Colorectal Cancer

Keywords

Explore important study keywords that can help with search, categorization, and topic discovery.

Water-aided colonoscopy Water Immersion colonoscopy Water Exchange colonoscopy Carbon-dioxide colonoscopy Painless unsedated colonoscopy Adenoma detection rate Mean Adenomas per Procedure

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

DOUBLE

Participants Investigators

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Air insufflation method.

Colonoscopy performed in the standard fashion, with the minimal air insufflation required to aid insertion and allowing for washing as needed. Considered to be standard procedure.

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Air Insufflation method.

Intervention Type OTHER

Air Insufflation method.

CO2 insufflation

Colonoscopy performed with CO2 insufflation using the insufflation unit, allowing for washing as needed.

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

CO2 insufflation

Intervention Type OTHER

CO2 insufflation.

Water Immersion/CO2

Infusion of water during the insertion phase of colonoscopy mainly to open the colonic lumen and progress to the cecum immersed in the water environment thus created, without attempting to clear the colon contents. Residual air in the colon will not be removed. Infused water and residual feces will be suctioned back predominantly during withdrawal. Insufflation not used until the cecum is reached. It will be allowed only 3 times and no more than 10 seconds each time (ITT failure if \>3) if the lumen cannot be seen. Withdrawal phase done using CO2 insufflation.

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Water Immersion/CO2

Intervention Type OTHER

Water Immersion during insertion, CO2 insufflation during withdrawal.

Water Exchange/CO2

Insufflation not used until the cecum is reached. Infusion of a sufficient amount of water to render the lumen of the colon a slit to progress with the colonoscope. Part of the infused water will be constantly suctioned back exchanging clean for dirty or hazy water. Air pockets will be always aspirated to collapse the lumen. After cecal intubation as much residual water as possible will be aspirated before beginning the withdrawal phase. During withdrawal residual water and feces will be suctioned. Withdrawal phase done using CO2 insufflation.

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Water Exchange/CO2

Intervention Type OTHER

Water Exchange during insertion, CO2 insufflation during withdrawal.

Water Immersion/AI

Infusion of water during the insertion phase of colonoscopy mainly to open the colonic lumen and progress to the cecum immersed in the water environment thus created, without attempting to clear the colon contents. Residual air in the colon will not be removed. Infused water and residual feces will be suctioned back predominantly during withdrawal. Insufflation not used until the cecum is reached. It will be allowed only 3 times and no more than 10 seconds each time (ITT failure if \>3) if the lumen cannot be seen. Withdrawal phase done using room air insufflation.

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Water Immersion/AI

Intervention Type OTHER

Water Immersion during insertion, AI insufflation during withdrawal.

Water Exchange/AI

Insufflation not used until the cecum is reached. Infusion of a sufficient amount of water to render the lumen of the colon a slit to progress with the colonoscope. Part of the infused water will be constantly suctioned back exchanging clean for dirty or hazy water. Air pockets will be always aspirated to collapse the lumen. After cecal intubation as much residual water as possible will be aspirated before beginning the withdrawal phase. During withdrawal residual water and feces will be suctioned. Withdrawal phase done using room air insufflation.

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Water Exchange/AI

Intervention Type OTHER

Water Exchange during insertion, AI insufflation during withdrawal.

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Air Insufflation method.

Air Insufflation method.

Intervention Type OTHER

CO2 insufflation

CO2 insufflation.

Intervention Type OTHER

Water Immersion/CO2

Water Immersion during insertion, CO2 insufflation during withdrawal.

Intervention Type OTHER

Water Exchange/CO2

Water Exchange during insertion, CO2 insufflation during withdrawal.

Intervention Type OTHER

Water Immersion/AI

Water Immersion during insertion, AI insufflation during withdrawal.

Intervention Type OTHER

Water Exchange/AI

Water Exchange during insertion, AI insufflation during withdrawal.

Intervention Type OTHER

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Consecutive 18 to 85 year-old diagnostic in-patients and outpatients agreeing to start procedure without premedication.

Exclusion Criteria

* Patient unwillingness to start the procedure without sedation/analgesia
* previous colorectal surgery
* proctosigmoidoscopy or bidirectional endoscopy
* patient refusal or inability to provide informed consent
* inadequate assumption of bowel preparation
* moderate or severe chronic obstructive pulmonary disease requiring oxygen
* medical history of CO2 retention
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

85 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Presidio Ospedaliero Santa Barbara

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Sergio Cadoni, M.D.

Responsabile Servizio Endoscopia Digestiva

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Sergio Cadoni, MD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

S. Barbara Hospital, Iglesias (CI), Italy

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Sepulveda Ambulatory Care Center, VA Greater Los Angeles Healthcare System

Los Angeles, California, United States

Site Status

Vìtkovice Hospital

Ostrava, , Czechia

Site Status

S. Barbara Hospital

Iglesias, CI, Italy

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

United States Czechia Italy

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Falt P, Liberda M, Smajstrla V, Kliment M, Bartkova A, Tvrdik J, Fojtik P, Urban O. Combination of water immersion and carbon dioxide insufflation for minimal sedation colonoscopy: a prospective, randomized, single-center trial. Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2012 Aug;24(8):971-7. doi: 10.1097/MEG.0b013e3283543f16.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 22569079 (View on PubMed)

Amato A, Radaelli F, Paggi S, Baccarin A, Spinzi G, Terruzzi V. Carbon dioxide insufflation or warm-water infusion versus standard air insufflation for unsedated colonoscopy: a randomized controlled trial. Dis Colon Rectum. 2013 Apr;56(4):511-8. doi: 10.1097/DCR.0b013e318279addd.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 23478620 (View on PubMed)

Leung FW, Amato A, Ell C, Friedland S, Harker JO, Hsieh YH, Leung JW, Mann SK, Paggi S, Pohl J, Radaelli F, Ramirez FC, Siao-Salera R, Terruzzi V. Water-aided colonoscopy: a systematic review. Gastrointest Endosc. 2012 Sep;76(3):657-66. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2012.04.467.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 22898423 (View on PubMed)

Rabenstein T, Radaelli F, Zolk O. Warm water infusion colonoscopy: a review and meta-analysis. Endoscopy. 2012 Oct;44(10):940-51. doi: 10.1055/s-0032-1310157. Epub 2012 Sep 17.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 22987214 (View on PubMed)

Leung FW. Water-aided colonoscopy. Gastroenterol Clin North Am. 2013 Sep;42(3):507-19. doi: 10.1016/j.gtc.2013.05.006.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 23931857 (View on PubMed)

Wu J, Hu B. The role of carbon dioxide insufflation in colonoscopy: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Endoscopy. 2012 Feb;44(2):128-36. doi: 10.1055/s-0031-1291487. Epub 2012 Jan 23.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 22271023 (View on PubMed)

Dellon ES, Hawk JS, Grimm IS, Shaheen NJ. The use of carbon dioxide for insufflation during GI endoscopy: a systematic review. Gastrointest Endosc. 2009 Apr;69(4):843-9. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2008.05.067. Epub 2009 Jan 18.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 19152906 (View on PubMed)

Cadoni S, Falt P, Gallittu P, Liggi M, Mura D, Smajstrla V, Erriu M, Leung FW. Water Exchange Is the Least Painful Colonoscope Insertion Technique and Increases Completion of Unsedated Colonoscopy. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2015 Nov;13(11):1972-80.e1-3. doi: 10.1016/j.cgh.2015.04.178. Epub 2015 May 5.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 25956838 (View on PubMed)

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

PG. 2013/3403

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id