Comparision of Air Versus CO2 for Distention During Sigmoidoscopy
NCT ID: NCT00771290
Last Updated: 2024-05-01
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
TERMINATED
NA
54 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2008-03-31
2009-03-31
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
In the case of the former, it may prove difficult to close a traditional laparotomy incision if the bowel is distended and may hinder respiration with the abdomen closed. In the setting of a laparoscopic procedure, the bowel distension limits the working space available to the surgeon. Since the laparoscopic domain is limited, a distended colon following intra-operative colonoscopy can prevent the minimally invasive completion of a case (meaning that a conversion to traditional "open" methods would be necessary) that otherwise was going well with good prospects of laparoscopic completion. Colonic distension also causes abdominal pain and lengthens the recovery time from the procedure.
The investigators believe that the use of CO2 during intra-operative colonoscopy or sigmoidoscopy (exam of only the last 2 to 2 ½ feet of the colon) will not cause long lasting bloating or distension of the colon as opposed to air. Carbon dioxide is absorbed 250 times faster than ambient air and may decrease after procedure colonic distension. This prospective, randomized study will compare the two gases in terms of colonic distension. Patients undergoing open or minimally invasive colorectal resection will be randomized to undergo intra-operative colonoscopy using one of the two gases. Direct measurements of colon diameter will be taken at specific time intervals after the colonoscopy.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Comparison of Methods to Distend the Colon During Insertion: CO2, Air Insufflation, Water-aided Colonoscopy
NCT01954862
RCT of Air Insufflation Versus Water Infusion Colonoscopy by Supervised Trainees
NCT00841282
Randomized Controlled Trial Comparing Water vs. Air Method for Performing Colonoscopy in Adult Female Subjects
NCT01790425
Application of CO2 Insufflations in Colonoscopy Randomized Trial
NCT00745927
Comparison of on Demand Sedation With Study Method Versus on Demand Sedation With Conventional Method for Performing Colonoscopy for Colorectal Cancer Screening and Surveillance
NCT00920751
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
In contrast, during a laparoscopic procedure, the colorectal dilatation can greatly decrease the amount of working and maneuvering room that is available to the surgeon to the point where the laparoscopic approach may have to be abandoned in favor of the big incision method. Thus, colon distension following sigmoidoscopy done with air during an abdominal operation can cause problems for the patient and the surgeon.
An alternative gas that can be pumped into the colon during colonoscopy is carbon dioxide (CO2). Unlike air, CO2 is very rapidly reabsorbed into the body from the colon, about 250 times faster than air. There is now a machine available which makes it possible to easily and safely use CO2 gas to distend the colon during colonoscopy. The investigators believe that the use of CO2 during intraoperative colonoscopy or sigmoidoscopy (exam of only the last 2 to 2 ½ feet of the colon) will not cause long lasting bloating or distension of the colon as opposed to air. Patients undergoing either open (big incision) or laparoscopic (multiple small incisions) rectal or sigmoid colon resection usually need to have intraoperative sigmoidoscopy at the end of the operation to inspect the inside of the colon and rectum and to check for an air leak in the vicinity of the rejoining point (anastomosis). In this study one half of the patients will, by the flip of a coin, get CO2 during their sigmoidoscopy while the remaining half will have air used to inflated the colon during their examination. After the sigmoidoscopic exam is completed the scope will be removed, without suctioning, and the colon diameter near the rectum measured by the surgeons looking and working in the abdomen. The size of the colon will again be measured every 5 minutes for the next 20 minutes while the surgeons prepare to close the abdomen and end the surgery. At the end of the 20 minute period, if the colon remains distended, the scope will be reinserted and the excess gas suctioned out. The surgeons carrying out this study believe that the colons of those patients getting CO2 gas for the sigmoidiscopy will more rapidly shrink in size towards their original diameter than the patients who get air pumped into the colon.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
SUPPORTIVE_CARE
NONE
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Air insufflation with standard endoscopy unit, CO2 insufflation for colonoscopy (special CO2 insufflation unit)
comparison of Air insufflation to CO2 insufflation during intraoperative endoscopy
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
Exclusion Criteria
18 Years
ALL
Yes
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Columbia University
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Richard L Whelan, MD
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Columbia University
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
NewYork Presbyterian Hospital
New York, New York, United States
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
AAAB6097
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.