Does Endoscope Position Detecting Unit Facilitate a Complete Colonoscopy Examination
NCT ID: NCT01434199
Last Updated: 2011-09-14
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
UNKNOWN
PHASE3
870 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2011-07-31
2012-07-31
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
The investigators aim to evaluate the benefit of MEI in term of cecal intubation rate across endoscopists of all levels of experience by making use of the newly developed Endoscopy Position Detecting Unit (UPD-3)by Olympus Optical Co, Ltd, Japan.
The investigators propose to conduct a prospective randomized controlled trial to compare the caecal intubation rate of colonoscopy being performed with and without UPD-3 guidance. Colonoscopies performed by endoscopists with different level of experience will be randomized to UPD-3 guided group or conventional group (no UPD-3 guidance). Patient controlled sedation (PCS) containing propofol and alfentanil will be given to all patients. The investigators hypothesize that UPD-3 guided colonoscopy is associated with high caecal intubation rate (complete colonoscopy), shorter time to caecum, less patient pain and lower sedative medication requirement. A high caecal intubation rate facilitates a reliable colonoscopy screening. Decreased colonic looping and shorter time to caecum may reduce patient discomfort during the procedure. It may also facilitate learning and acquiring the skill of colonoscopy in trainees.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
The Effect of Individualized Intervention on the Quality of Bowel Preparation
NCT04446195
Outcome of Colonoscopy Screening and Surveillance
NCT01827241
A Comparison of an Ultra-thin and Standard Colonoscope in Achieving Caecal Intubation
NCT01142167
Safety & Effectiveness of Nurse Performed Colonoscopies Under Supervision
NCT01923155
Study on the Impact of Education Website on the Quality of Outpatient Bowel Preparation for Colonoscopy
NCT02466724
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Methods
Trial design This is a prospective randomized controlled trial comparing the cecal intubation rate of colonoscopy being performed with and without UPD guidance by endoscopists of different levels of experience. The trial will be conducted in the Endoscopy Unit of a university affiliated hospital.
Patients who will have elective colonoscopy in the Endoscopy Unit during the study period, and meet the following inclusion criteria are recruited. The colonoscopy will be done by 6 dedicated endoscopists with different levels of experience in performing colonoscopy.
Interventions
UPD-3 and the specific colonoscope with an in-built magnetic imaging facility (Olympus Optical Co, Ltd, Japan) will be used in all examinations. A mobile sensor will be attached to the assistant's hand, so that the hand position in relation to the colonoscope could be shown in the imager screen.
Patient controlled sedation (PCS) will be given to all patients. It is delivered by means of Graseby 3300 PCA pump (Graseby Medical Ltd), using a mixture of propofol (200mg in 20ml) and alfentanil (0.5mg in 1ml) in a 25-ml syringe. The drugs will be delivered in response to pressure on a hand-held button controlled by the patient. Each bolus (0.5ml) delivers 4.8mg propofol and 12microgram alfentanil. No loading dose was used and the lock-out time of the PCA machine was set at zero. All patients will be instructed in the use of the hand-held button before colonoscopy. Nasal oxygen (2l/min) will be given to all patients, and oxygen saturation and blood pressure will be continuously monitored throughout the procedure.
The procedure will be randomized to either with the colonoscopist viewing the imager screen or not.
UPD guided group: Both the colonoscopist and assistant will be viewing the imager screen during the whole procedure. Information about colonoscopy looping will interpreted and documented by the colonoscopist. Anterior-position view is the standard reference. When abdominal compression is required, the assistant nurse should have the hand held probe attached, such that abdominal compression is guided by the image.
Conventional group (non- UPD guided): The imager screen will be turned to the other side such that both the colonoscopist and assistant is blind to UPD images. When the colonoscopist encountered looping as defined by paradoxical movement of the tip or disproportionate advancement in endoscopic view to the shaft insertion, the colonoscopist is requested to estimate the type of loop formed. The images will be captured for later interpretation.
The primary outcome is cecal intubation rate. Cecal intubation is defined as visualization of appendix orifice and ileocaecal valve, procedure started by a trainee and taken over by supervisor before caecal intubation is regarded as incomplete.
Sample size
The cecal intubation rate could be increased by at least 11% for trainee in a randomized trial by Shah \[14\] and 16% for trainee and experienced endoscopist in another trial \[15\]. Since the overall cecal intubation rate in our Endoscopy unit without UPD guide is at least 90% already, the investigators expect a modest benefit from UPD guidance. Assume a difference of 5% in caecal intubation rate (from 90% in conventional group to 95% in the UPD guided group) with a power of 80% and a type I error of 5%, 2 sided analysis, 435 patients will be needed in each group. Thus a sample size of 870 patients is required.
Randomization
Informed consent will be obtained before colonoscopy in the Endoscopy Unit, if the patient fulfils the inclusion criteria. Block randomization will be done on a 1:1 basis, to ensure equal number of UPD guided or conventional colonoscopies are done by each endoscopist.
A sealed non-opaque envelope (produced according to the computer generated random sequence) will be opened to determine the appropriate limb of entry before scope insertion.
It is not possible to blind the study.
Statistical analysis
The data will be analyzed according to the intention-to-treat principle. The chi-squared test (or Fisher's exact test when appropriate), Student's t-test, and Mann-Whitney U test will be used to compare categorical, parametric, and non-parametric data, respectively. A P value \<0.05 is considered statistically significant.
Planned interim analysis will be conducted after recruiting 50% of patients.
Data collection Data will be collected by the in-charged endoscopist and assistant after each procedure in a standardized data sheet.
Accrual rate It is expected that about 20 cases per week will be recruited for randomization. The study could be finished in around 1 year time.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
DIAGNOSTIC
NONE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
UPD guided group
Both the colonoscopist and assistant will be viewing the imager screen during the whole procedure.
UPD guidance
A real time, three-dimensional image and position of the colonoscope would be provided to the endoscopist during the procedure.
non-UPD guided group
Conventional colonoscopy would be done without image guidance.
No interventions assigned to this group
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
UPD guidance
A real time, three-dimensional image and position of the colonoscope would be provided to the endoscopist during the procedure.
Other Intervention Names
Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* American Society of Anaesthesiologist (ASA) grading I-III
* Scheduled for elective colonoscopy
Exclusion Criteria
* Refuse to consent to participate
* History of allergy to propofol or alfentanil
* Has a pacemaker in situ
* Pregnant lady
18 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Chinese University of Hong Kong
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Hon Sok Fei
Associate consultant
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Sophie SF Hon, MD
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Chinese University of Hong Kong
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Alice Ho Miu Ling Nethersole Hospital
Hong Kong, Hong Kong, China
Prince of Wales Hospital
Hong Kong, Hong Kong, China
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Central Contacts
Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.
Facility Contacts
Find local site contact details for specific facilities participating in the trial.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Shah SG, Brooker JC, Thapar C, Suzuki N, Williams CB, Saunders BP. Effect of magnetic endoscope imaging on patient tolerance and sedation requirements during colonoscopy: a randomized controlled trial. Gastrointest Endosc. 2002 Jun;55(7):832-7. doi: 10.1067/mge.2002.124097.
Shah SG, Brooker JC, Williams CB, Thapar C, Saunders BP. Effect of magnetic endoscope imaging on colonoscopy performance: a randomised controlled trial. Lancet. 2000 Nov 18;356(9243):1718-22. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(00)03205-0.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
CRE-2011.125-T
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.