Training and Validation of Models of Factors to Predict Inadequate Bowel Preparation Colonoscopy
NCT ID: NCT04101097
Last Updated: 2020-06-16
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
900 participants
OBSERVATIONAL
2019-09-03
2020-03-30
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
This study aimed: 1) to compare the values of three availlable models (based on patient-related factors) in predicting inadeqaute bowel preparation in a prospective, multicentered cohort of patients undergoing colonoscopy; 2) to investigate whether a new model based on preparation-related or a combined model based on patient-related and preparation-related factors is comparable to previous models based on patient-related factors.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Validation of a Prediction Model for Inadequate Bowel Preparation
NCT06438237
External Validation of a Predictive Model for Bowel Preparation in Patients Undergoing Colonoscopy
NCT04325139
The Effect of a Predictive Model of Bowel Preparation Based on Procedure-related Factors
NCT04434625
Risk Factors for Inadequate Bowel Preparation Before Colonoscopy
NCT06878378
Pre-procedure Modle Predicts Bowel Preparation Quality Prior Colonoscopy
NCT04160104
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
COHORT
PROSPECTIVE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
training group
All patients received oral and written instructions on the appointment day. All patients were instructed to have low-residue food for lunch and dinner on the day before colonoscopy. Patients were instructed to begin drinking the first 1.5L-2L PEG at 7:00-9:00 PM on the day before colonoscopy. On the day of the procedure, they took another 1.5L-2L 4-6 hours before colonoscopy. Patients were encouraged more to drink more clear liquids after purgatives for adequate hydration.
validation group
All patients received oral and written instructions on the appointment day. All patients were instructed to have low-residue food for lunch and dinner on the day before colonoscopy. Patients were instructed to begin drinking the first 1.5L-2L PEG at 7:00-9:00 PM on the day before colonoscopy. On the day of the procedure, they took another 1.5L-2L 4-6 hours before colonoscopy. Patients were encouraged more to drink more clear liquids after purgatives for adequate hydration.
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* Using PEG for bowel preparation before colonoscopy
Exclusion Criteria
* Colon resection
* Suspected bowel obstruction
* Hemodynamically unstable
* Lactating or pregnant women
* Unwilling to provided informed content
18 Years
80 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Shenzhen Hospital of Southern Medical University
OTHER
Xiamen Humanity Hospital
OTHER
Huaihe Hospital of Henan University
OTHER
Shaanxi Second People's Hospital
UNKNOWN
Air Force Military Medical University, China
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Yanglin Pan
Associate Professor
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Department of Gastroenterology, Hongai Hospital
Xiamen, Fujian, China
Department of Holistic Integrative Medicine, Shenzhen Hospital of Southern Medical University
Shenzhen, Guangdong, China
Department of Gastroenterology, Huaihe Hospital of Henan University
Kaifeng, Henan, China
Department of Gastroenterology, Shaanxi Second People's Hospital
Xi'an, Shaanxi, China
Endoscopic center, Xijing Hospital of Digestive Diseases
Xi'an, Shaanxi, China
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Hassan C, Fuccio L, Bruno M, Pagano N, Spada C, Carrara S, Giordanino C, Rondonotti E, Curcio G, Dulbecco P, Fabbri C, Della Casa D, Maiero S, Simone A, Iacopini F, Feliciangeli G, Manes G, Rinaldi A, Zullo A, Rogai F, Repici A. A predictive model identifies patients most likely to have inadequate bowel preparation for colonoscopy. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2012 May;10(5):501-6. doi: 10.1016/j.cgh.2011.12.037. Epub 2012 Jan 10.
Dik VK, Moons LM, Huyuk M, van der Schaar P, de Vos Tot Nederveen Cappel WH, Ter Borg PC, Meijssen MA, Ouwendijk RJ, Le Fevre DM, Stouten M, van der Galien O, Hiemstra TJ, Monkelbaan JF, van Oijen MG, Siersema PD; Colonoscopy Quality Initiative. Predicting inadequate bowel preparation for colonoscopy in participants receiving split-dose bowel preparation: development and validation of a prediction score. Gastrointest Endosc. 2015 Mar;81(3):665-72. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2014.09.066. Epub 2015 Jan 17.
Gimeno-Garcia AZ, Baute JL, Hernandez G, Morales D, Gonzalez-Perez CD, Nicolas-Perez D, Alarcon-Fernandez O, Jimenez A, Hernandez-Guerra M, Romero R, Alonso I, Gonzalez Y, Adrian Z, Carrillo M, Ramos L, Quintero E. Risk factors for inadequate bowel preparation: a validated predictive score. Endoscopy. 2017 Jun;49(6):536-543. doi: 10.1055/s-0043-101683. Epub 2017 Mar 10.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
KY20190903-3
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.