Bowel Preparation by Face-to-face Re-education on the Day of Colonoscopy for Outpatient: a RCT

NCT ID: NCT02772250

Last Updated: 2017-04-10

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

PHASE4

Total Enrollment

658 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2016-05-31

Study Completion Date

2016-10-31

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

The study compares the efficacy of bowel preparation between the face-to-face re-education(FFRE group) and normal education (no-FFRE group) in patients.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Despite advances in bowel preparation methods,bowel preparation is inadequate in up to one-third of all colonoscopies in reported series.Inadequate bowel cleansing results in negative consequences for the examination, including incomplete visualisation of the colon, missed lesions, procedural difficulties, prolonged procedure time and reduced time interval until follow-up, and an estimated 12-22% increase in overall colonoscopy cost.

The adequacy of a bowel preparation is closely linked to patient compliance with both dietary and purge instructions.One study performed in Asia showed that non-compliance with bowel preparation instructions, lower education level, and a long wait for the colonoscopy appointment were independent risk factors for poor bowel preparation. Another study performed in China showed that telephone re-education(TRE) about the details of bowel preparation on the day before colonoscopy significantly improved the quality of bowel preparation and PDR. So,it is reasonable to hypothesise that efforts to improve education and maximise patient compliance during the preparatory period will enhance the efficacy of bowel preparation.

The study compares the efficacy of bowel preparation between the face-to-face re-education (FFRE group) and telephone re-education (TRE group) in patients.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Bowel Preparation

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

SINGLE

Investigators

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

telephone re-education(TRE)

Subjects who are randomized into this group receive regular instructions at the time of their appointment to discuss colonoscopy (a nurse provides education of 5 minutes and meanwhilet sent a bookle to the patient) and a TRE which was conducted by a investigator at 15:00-17:00 on the day before colonoscopy.

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

telephone re-education(TRE)

Intervention Type BEHAVIORAL

Subjects who are randomized into this group receive regular instructions at the time of their appointment to discuss colonoscopy (a nurse provides education of 5 minutes and meanwhilet sent a bookle to the patient) and a TRE which was conducted by one investigator at 15:00-17:00 on the day before colonoscopy.

face-to-face re-education (FFRE)

Subjects who are randomized into this group receive regular instructions on the day of their appointment to discuss colonoscopy and also a FFRE which was conducted by a investigator on the same-day of procedure at hospital.

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

face-to-face re-education (FFRE)

Intervention Type BEHAVIORAL

Subjects who are randomized into this group receive regular instructions on the day of their appointment to discuss colonoscopy and also a FFRE which was conducted by a investigator on the same-day of procedure at hospital.

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

telephone re-education(TRE)

Subjects who are randomized into this group receive regular instructions at the time of their appointment to discuss colonoscopy (a nurse provides education of 5 minutes and meanwhilet sent a bookle to the patient) and a TRE which was conducted by one investigator at 15:00-17:00 on the day before colonoscopy.

Intervention Type BEHAVIORAL

face-to-face re-education (FFRE)

Subjects who are randomized into this group receive regular instructions on the day of their appointment to discuss colonoscopy and also a FFRE which was conducted by a investigator on the same-day of procedure at hospital.

Intervention Type BEHAVIORAL

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Outpatients aged 18-80 years undergoing colonoscopy who had provided written informed consent

Exclusion Criteria

* history of colorectal surgery
* severe colonic stricture or obstructing tumour
* dysphagia
* compromised swallowing reflex or mental status
* significant gastroparesis or gastric outlet obstruction or ileus
* known or suspected bowel obstruction or perforation
* severe chronic renal failure (creatinine clearance\<30 ml/min)
* severe congestive heart failure (New York Heart Association class III or IV)
* uncontrolled hypertension (systolic blood pressure\>170 mm Hg, diastolic blood pressure\>100 mm Hg)
* toxic colitis or megacolon
* dehydration
* disturbance of electrolytes
* pregnancy or lactation
* unable to give informed consent
* haemodynamically unstable
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

80 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Shandong University

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Yanqing Li

PhD,MD

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

li yanqing, PhD,MD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Qilu Hospital, Shandong University

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Department of Gastroenterology, Qilu Hospital, Shandong University

Jinan, Shandong, China

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

China

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

2016SDU-QILU-04

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.