Can Simple and Inexpensive Techniques Enhance Patient Comfort

NCT ID: NCT00747084

Last Updated: 2017-04-21

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

TERMINATED

Clinical Phase

PHASE1/PHASE2

Total Enrollment

82 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2007-12-31

Study Completion Date

2012-12-31

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

This research study compares two methods of performing colonoscopy without sedation. The standard method is to insert the colonoscope without adding any water to the colon, and when colonic spasms occur during the examination, waiting for the spasms to subside before continuing with the insertion of the colonoscope. The study method involves putting 200 ml (7 oz) of warm water through the colonoscope into the colon at the beginning of the examination, and when colonic spasms occur during the examination, putting 30 ml (1 oz) of warm water into the spastic area(s) to relax the colonic spasms.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

The purpose of the study is to conduct a RCT study to determine the effectiveness of loading the sigmoid colon with warm water and warm water irrigation for dealing with colonic spasms in enhancing patient abdominal comfort during unsedated colonoscopy. The specific aim is to compare Study Treatment of warm water loading and irrigation when spasms occur with Control Treatment of no water loading and waiting for spasms to subside. The proportion of patients complaining of abdominal discomfort and their discomfort score are the primary outcome variables. The secondary outcome variables and co-variables described below will be recorded in a prospective manner to ensure completeness of data collection. In preliminary clinical observation at VA Sepulveda ACC, 25 to 30% of VA patients accept colonoscopy without sedation. The goal of this study is to find ways of further reducing discomfort associated with unsedated colonoscopy.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Colonoscopy

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

SINGLE_GROUP

Primary Study Purpose

DIAGNOSTIC

Blinding Strategy

SINGLE

Participants

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Arm 1: Study Treatment

Study Treatment: warm water loading of the sigmoid colon and warm water irrigation for dealing with colonic spasms.

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Colonoscopy

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

The purpose of the study is to conduct an RCT study to determine the effectiveness of loading the sigmoid colon with warm water and warm water irrigation for dealing with colonic spasms in enhancing patient abdominal comfort during unsedated colonoscopy.

Arm 2: Control Treatment

Control Treatment: no water loading and waiting for spasms to subside.

Group Type NO_INTERVENTION

No interventions assigned to this group

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Colonoscopy

The purpose of the study is to conduct an RCT study to determine the effectiveness of loading the sigmoid colon with warm water and warm water irrigation for dealing with colonic spasms in enhancing patient abdominal comfort during unsedated colonoscopy.

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Adult male and female
* Adult patients 18 years old in need of colonoscopy for screening or follow up of colonic polyps, and willing to consent to be randomized.

Exclusion Criteria

* Patients receiving outpatient prescription narcotic treatment \[more likely to have discomfort response even with sedation (42)\].
* Patients who report excessive anxiety \[pre-endoscopy appointment, single question asking how anxious the patient generally is, four point scale (1 = not at all, 2 = slightly, 3 = moderately, 4 = excessively\].
* Excessive anxiety is significantly correlated with lack of cooperation during colonoscopy and high dissatisfaction score after the procedure (43).
* Patients with moderate to severe abdominal discomfort, unable to provide informed consent, have a poor bowel preparation (discolored rectal output or feces filled rectal vault), and those who decline to participate, will also be excluded.
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

80 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

VA Office of Research and Development

FED

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Felix W Leung, MD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

VA Greater Los Angeles Healthcare System, Sepulveda, CA

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

VA Greater Los Angeles Healthcare System, Sepulveda, CA

Sepulveda, California, United States

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

United States

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Leung FW, Harker JO, Jackson G, Okamoto KE, Behbahani OM, Jamgotchian NJ, Aharonian HS, Guth PH, Mann SK, Leung JW. A proof-of-principle, prospective, randomized, controlled trial demonstrating improved outcomes in scheduled unsedated colonoscopy by the water method. Gastrointest Endosc. 2010 Oct;72(4):693-700. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2010.05.020. Epub 2010 Jul 8.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 20619405 (View on PubMed)

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

FLVA0055

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

Warm Water and Unsedated Colonoscopy
NCT01463319 COMPLETED EARLY_PHASE1