Cap-attached Colonoscopy Versus Regular Colonoscopy for Trainees

NCT ID: NCT01400087

Last Updated: 2021-09-27

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

500 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2011-06-30

Study Completion Date

2013-11-30

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

The aim of this prospective randomized controlled trial is to assess the efficacy of cap-attached colonoscopy to improve cecal intubation in comparison with regular colonoscopy for trainees.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Colorectal cancer is one of the major malignancies in western countries and also in Japan. Therefore , the demand for total colonoscopy (TCS) has risen remarkably. However, failure to reach the cecum occurs in up to 10 % of cases.

A difficult colonoscopy procedure will often be associated with more complications, and require heavier sedation to alleviate patient's discomfort.

Auxiliary devices that could facilitate the examination would be needed. A cap is a simple device that can be attached to the tip of a colonoscope. The advantage of the cap in getting a good view might be helpful in cecal intubation by depressing the folds and also by keeping an appropriate distance between the colonoscope lens and colonic mucosa. We speculated that inexperienced colonoscopists would obtain greater benefit from cap-attached colonoscopy.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Colonoscopy Lower Gastrointestinal Tract

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

DIAGNOSTIC

Blinding Strategy

DOUBLE

Participants Outcome Assessors

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Cap-attached Colonoscopy

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Cap-attached Colonoscopy Versus Regular Colonoscopy

Intervention Type DEVICE

Trainees were divided into two group; Cap-attached Colonoscopy group or Regular Colonoscopy group. Trainees allocated to the former group undergo colonoscopy with cap for all cases, the latter without cap.

Regular colonoscopy

Group Type PLACEBO_COMPARATOR

Cap-attached Colonoscopy Versus Regular Colonoscopy

Intervention Type DEVICE

Trainees were divided into two group; Cap-attached Colonoscopy group or Regular Colonoscopy group. Trainees allocated to the former group undergo colonoscopy with cap for all cases, the latter without cap.

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Cap-attached Colonoscopy Versus Regular Colonoscopy

Trainees were divided into two group; Cap-attached Colonoscopy group or Regular Colonoscopy group. Trainees allocated to the former group undergo colonoscopy with cap for all cases, the latter without cap.

Intervention Type DEVICE

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Patients who undergo colonoscopy examination

Exclusion Criteria

* Known to have colonic stricture or obstructing tumor from the results of other investigations such as CT scan or barium enema
* Presence of acute surgical conditions such as severe colitis, megacolon, ischemic colitis and active gastrointestinal bleeding ・Patients who diagnosed as inflammatory bowel disease
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Showa University

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Makoto Kutsukawa

Researcher

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Shin-ei Kudo

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Digestive Disease Center, Showa University Northern Yokohama Hospital

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Digestive Disease Center, Showa University Northern Yokohama Hospital

Yokohama, Kanagawa, Japan

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Japan

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Kondo S, Yamaji Y, Watabe H, Yamada A, Sugimoto T, Ohta M, Ogura K, Okamoto M, Yoshida H, Kawabe T, Omata M. A randomized controlled trial evaluating the usefulness of a transparent hood attached to the tip of the colonoscope. Am J Gastroenterol. 2007 Jan;102(1):75-81. doi: 10.1111/j.1572-0241.2006.00897.x. Epub 2006 Nov 13.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 17100978 (View on PubMed)

Lee YT, Lai LH, Hui AJ, Wong VW, Ching JY, Wong GL, Wu JC, Chan HL, Leung WK, Lau JY, Sung JJ, Chan FK. Efficacy of cap-assisted colonoscopy in comparison with regular colonoscopy: a randomized controlled trial. Am J Gastroenterol. 2009 Jan;104(1):41-6. doi: 10.1038/ajg.2008.56.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 19098847 (View on PubMed)

Harada Y, Hirasawa D, Fujita N, Noda Y, Kobayashi G, Ishida K, Yonechi M, Ito K, Suzuki T, Sugawara T, Horaguchi J, Takasawa O, Obana T, Oohira T, Onochi K, Kanno Y, Kuroha M, Iwai W. Impact of a transparent hood on the performance of total colonoscopy: a randomized controlled trial. Gastrointest Endosc. 2009 Mar;69(3 Pt 2):637-44. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2008.08.029.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 19251004 (View on PubMed)

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

CAPSTUDY

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.