Cap-attached Colonoscopy Versus Regular Colonoscopy for Trainees
NCT ID: NCT01400087
Last Updated: 2021-09-27
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
NA
500 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2011-06-30
2013-11-30
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Cap Assisted Colonoscopy Enhances Quality Based Competency in Colonoscopy Among Trainees
NCT02472730
Risk Factors for Inadequate Bowel Preparation Before Colonoscopy
NCT06878378
Use of Magnetic Imaging to Asses the Efficacy of Cap Assisted Colonoscopy in Reducing Looping and Improving Patient Acceptance for the Colonoscopy Procedure
NCT00365534
A Study to Assess Cap-Assisted Colonoscopy Versus Regular Colonoscopy for the First or Repeated Colonoscopy
NCT00153647
Impact of Digital Tools on the Quality of Bowel Preparation for Colonoscopy
NCT05734079
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
A difficult colonoscopy procedure will often be associated with more complications, and require heavier sedation to alleviate patient's discomfort.
Auxiliary devices that could facilitate the examination would be needed. A cap is a simple device that can be attached to the tip of a colonoscope. The advantage of the cap in getting a good view might be helpful in cecal intubation by depressing the folds and also by keeping an appropriate distance between the colonoscope lens and colonic mucosa. We speculated that inexperienced colonoscopists would obtain greater benefit from cap-attached colonoscopy.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
DIAGNOSTIC
DOUBLE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Cap-attached Colonoscopy
Cap-attached Colonoscopy Versus Regular Colonoscopy
Trainees were divided into two group; Cap-attached Colonoscopy group or Regular Colonoscopy group. Trainees allocated to the former group undergo colonoscopy with cap for all cases, the latter without cap.
Regular colonoscopy
Cap-attached Colonoscopy Versus Regular Colonoscopy
Trainees were divided into two group; Cap-attached Colonoscopy group or Regular Colonoscopy group. Trainees allocated to the former group undergo colonoscopy with cap for all cases, the latter without cap.
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Cap-attached Colonoscopy Versus Regular Colonoscopy
Trainees were divided into two group; Cap-attached Colonoscopy group or Regular Colonoscopy group. Trainees allocated to the former group undergo colonoscopy with cap for all cases, the latter without cap.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
Exclusion Criteria
* Presence of acute surgical conditions such as severe colitis, megacolon, ischemic colitis and active gastrointestinal bleeding ・Patients who diagnosed as inflammatory bowel disease
18 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Showa University
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Makoto Kutsukawa
Researcher
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Shin-ei Kudo
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Digestive Disease Center, Showa University Northern Yokohama Hospital
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Digestive Disease Center, Showa University Northern Yokohama Hospital
Yokohama, Kanagawa, Japan
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Kondo S, Yamaji Y, Watabe H, Yamada A, Sugimoto T, Ohta M, Ogura K, Okamoto M, Yoshida H, Kawabe T, Omata M. A randomized controlled trial evaluating the usefulness of a transparent hood attached to the tip of the colonoscope. Am J Gastroenterol. 2007 Jan;102(1):75-81. doi: 10.1111/j.1572-0241.2006.00897.x. Epub 2006 Nov 13.
Lee YT, Lai LH, Hui AJ, Wong VW, Ching JY, Wong GL, Wu JC, Chan HL, Leung WK, Lau JY, Sung JJ, Chan FK. Efficacy of cap-assisted colonoscopy in comparison with regular colonoscopy: a randomized controlled trial. Am J Gastroenterol. 2009 Jan;104(1):41-6. doi: 10.1038/ajg.2008.56.
Harada Y, Hirasawa D, Fujita N, Noda Y, Kobayashi G, Ishida K, Yonechi M, Ito K, Suzuki T, Sugawara T, Horaguchi J, Takasawa O, Obana T, Oohira T, Onochi K, Kanno Y, Kuroha M, Iwai W. Impact of a transparent hood on the performance of total colonoscopy: a randomized controlled trial. Gastrointest Endosc. 2009 Mar;69(3 Pt 2):637-44. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2008.08.029.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
CAPSTUDY
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.