Randomized Controlled Trial of Wellness Recovery Action Planning
NCT ID: NCT01024569
Last Updated: 2020-01-10
Study Results
Outcome measurements, participant flow, baseline characteristics, and adverse events have been published for this study.
View full resultsBasic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
NA
555 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2007-12-31
2009-10-31
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Hypothesis #1: Compared to wait-list control subjects, those who participate in the WRAP intervention will report reduced levels of psychiatric symptoms.
Hypothesis #2: Compared to wait-list control subjects, those who participate in the WRAP intervention will report enhanced enhanced feelings of empowerment, hope, recovery, quality of life, and functioning.
Hypothesis #3: Compared to wait-list controls, those who participate in the WRAP intervention will report increased levels of social support.
Hypothesis #4: Compared to wait-list controls, those who participate in the WRAP intervention will report increased use of peer services, higher satisfaction with services, and have lower overall service costs.
Hypothesis #5: Compared to controls, those who participate in the WRAP intervention will report increased knowledge of mental illness self-management, including making/using a WRAP plan.
Hypothesis #6: There will be no difference in employment rates of control vs. intervention subjects.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Comparing Mobile Health (mHealth) and Clinic-Based Self-Management Interventions for Serious Mental Illness
NCT02421965
Weight Management & Wellness for People With Psychiatric Disabilities
NCT05128045
Testing Self-Directed Care in Florida
NCT05649449
Healthy ReStart Intervention to Improve Health and Functioning
NCT05544344
Recovery Group Pilot
NCT00522613
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
HEALTH_SERVICES_RESEARCH
SINGLE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Wellness Recovery Action Planning (WRAP)
WRAP consists of 8 sessions lasting for 2-½ hours, convened once a week over a period of 8 weeks. Topics include: Introduction to WRAP, Developing a Wellness Toolbox, Creating a Daily Maintenance Plan, Identifying Triggers, Identifying Early Warning Signs, Managing When Things Break Down, and Crisis Planning. Coursework is interactive, using lecture, question and answer, group discussion, and individual or group exercises. Each session includes a lecture on recovery topics such as self-esteem, changing negative thoughts to positive ones, peer support, and lifestyle issues.
Wellness Recovery Action Planning (WRAP)
WRAP consists of 8 sessions lasting for 2-½ hours, convened once a week over a period of 8 weeks.
Comparison Wait-List Group
Participants assigned to the comparison group were in a delayed treatment condition in which they continued in public services as usual, but were offered the chance to attend WRAP groups after their final research interview.
No interventions assigned to this group
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Wellness Recovery Action Planning (WRAP)
WRAP consists of 8 sessions lasting for 2-½ hours, convened once a week over a period of 8 weeks.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* English speaking
* severe mental illness as confirmed by: 1) a Kessler Self-Report Measure (K-6) score of 13 or higher; and/or 2) enrolled as a client of the public mental health system in the state of Ohio.
Exclusion Criteria
* not meeting clinical criteria for severe mental illness
18 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
U.S. Department of Education
FED
Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration (SAMHSA)
FED
University of Illinois at Chicago
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Judith A. Cook
Professor of Psychiatry
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Judith A. Cook, PhD
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
University of Illinois at Chicago, Department of Psychiatry
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
University of Illinois at Chicago, Department of Psychiatry
Chicago, Illinois, United States
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Cook JA, Copeland ME, Jonikas JA, Hamilton MM, Razzano LA, Grey DD, Floyd CB, Hudson WB, Macfarlane RT, Carter TM, Boyd S. Results of a randomized controlled trial of mental illness self-management using Wellness Recovery Action Planning. Schizophr Bull. 2012 Jun;38(4):881-91. doi: 10.1093/schbul/sbr012. Epub 2011 Mar 14.
Cook JA, Copeland ME, Floyd CB, Jonikas JA, Hamilton MM, Razzano L, Carter TM, Hudson WB, Grey DD, Boyd S. A randomized controlled trial of effects of Wellness Recovery Action Planning on depression, anxiety, and recovery. Psychiatr Serv. 2012 Jun;63(6):541-7. doi: 10.1176/appi.ps.201100125.
Jonikas JA, Grey DD, Copeland ME, Razzano LA, Hamilton MM, Floyd CB, Hudson WB, Cook JA. Improving propensity for patient self-advocacy through wellness recovery action planning: results of a randomized controlled trial. Community Ment Health J. 2013 Jun;49(3):260-9. doi: 10.1007/s10597-011-9475-9. Epub 2011 Dec 14.
Snyder CR, Sympson SC, Ybasco FC, Borders TF, Babyak MA, Higgins RL. Development and validation of the State Hope Scale. J Pers Soc Psychol. 1996 Feb;70(2):321-35. doi: 10.1037//0022-3514.70.2.321.
Scanlan JN, Hancock N, Honey A. The Recovery Assessment Scale - Domains and Stages (RAS-DS): Sensitivity to change over time and convergent validity with level of unmet need. Psychiatry Res. 2018 Mar;261:560-564. doi: 10.1016/j.psychres.2018.01.042.
Brashers DE, Haas SM, Neidig JL. The patient self-advocacy scale: measuring patient involvement in health care decision-making interactions. Health Commun. 1999;11(2):97-121. doi: 10.1207/s15327027hc1102_1.
Skevington SM, Lotfy M, O'Connell KA; WHOQOL Group. The World Health Organization's WHOQOL-BREF quality of life assessment: psychometric properties and results of the international field trial. A report from the WHOQOL group. Qual Life Res. 2004 Mar;13(2):299-310. doi: 10.1023/B:QURE.0000018486.91360.00.
Related Links
Access external resources that provide additional context or updates about the study.
University of Illinois at Chicago National Research \& Training Center
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
UIC WRAP Study
Identifier Type: OTHER_GRANT
Identifier Source: secondary_id
2006-0103
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.