Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
NA
1503 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2012-04-30
2012-09-30
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Student Wellness 2.0
NCT06804213
An Online Trial of Five Well-being Programs
NCT03233022
Behavioral Mechanisms and Health Outcomes of Positive Psychological Intervention
NCT06483568
Evaluating Student Wellness Using a Blended Approach of the Roadmap mHealth App Plus Wellness Coaching
NCT05736445
Efficacy of Three Online Well-Being Programs to Improve Work-Related Outcomes
NCT03306654
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
TREATMENT
SINGLE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Treatment
Intervention: Daily Challenge
Daily Challenge
Web-based behavioral intervention aiming to improve individuals' well-being.
Control
Weekly Well-being, an email-based health information delivery service.
No interventions assigned to this group
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Daily Challenge
Web-based behavioral intervention aiming to improve individuals' well-being.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* Provided informed consent to participate in the study
Exclusion Criteria
* Has a Facebook friend enrolled in the study
* Fails to complete the informed consent and registration process in the allotted time (45 minutes)
* Gender (recruitment will be titrated to ensure a minimum of 30% male ratio)
18 Years
ALL
Yes
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Healthways, Inc.
INDUSTRY
MeYou Health, LLC
INDUSTRY
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Josee Poirier, PhD
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
MeYou Health, LLC
Nathan K Cobb, MD
Role: STUDY_CHAIR
MeYou Health, LLC
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
MeYou Health office
Boston, Massachusetts, United States
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Harrison PL, Pope JE, Coberley CR, Rula EY. Evaluation of the relationship between individual well-being and future health care utilization and cost. Popul Health Manag. 2012 Dec;15(6):325-30. doi: 10.1089/pop.2011.0089. Epub 2012 Feb 22.
Prochaska JO, Evers KE, Castle PH, Johnson JL, Prochaska JM, Rula EY, Coberley C, Pope JE. Enhancing multiple domains of well-being by decreasing multiple health risk behaviors: a randomized clinical trial. Popul Health Manag. 2012 Oct;15(5):276-86. doi: 10.1089/pop.2011.0060. Epub 2012 Feb 21.
Heesch KC, Masse LC, Dunn AL, Frankowski RF, Mullen PD. Does adherence to a lifestyle physical activity intervention predict changes in physical activity? J Behav Med. 2003 Aug;26(4):333-48. doi: 10.1023/a:1024205011001.
Strecher VJ, McClure J, Alexander G, Chakraborty B, Nair V, Konkel J, Greene S, Couper M, Carlier C, Wiese C, Little R, Pomerleau C, Pomerleau O. The role of engagement in a tailored web-based smoking cessation program: randomized controlled trial. J Med Internet Res. 2008 Nov 4;10(5):e36. doi: 10.2196/jmir.1002.
Hill JO, Wyatt HR, Reed GW, Peters JC. Obesity and the environment: where do we go from here? Science. 2003 Feb 7;299(5608):853-5. doi: 10.1126/science.1079857.
Hill JO. Can a small-changes approach help address the obesity epidemic? A report of the Joint Task Force of the American Society for Nutrition, Institute of Food Technologists, and International Food Information Council. Am J Clin Nutr. 2009 Feb;89(2):477-84. doi: 10.3945/ajcn.2008.26566. Epub 2008 Dec 16.
Eysenbach G. The law of attrition. J Med Internet Res. 2005 Mar 31;7(1):e11. doi: 10.2196/jmir.7.1.e11.
Christakis NA. Social networks and collateral health effects. BMJ. 2004 Jul 24;329(7459):184-5. doi: 10.1136/bmj.329.7459.184. No abstract available.
Christakis NA, Fowler JH. The spread of obesity in a large social network over 32 years. N Engl J Med. 2007 Jul 26;357(4):370-9. doi: 10.1056/NEJMsa066082. Epub 2007 Jul 25.
Christakis NA. Health care in a web. BMJ. 2008 Jun 28;336(7659):1468. doi: 10.1136/bmj.a452.
Pew Research Center. Social networking sites and our lives (Report). 2011. http:/pewinternet.org/Reports/2011/Technology-and-social-networks.aspx
Helliwell JF, Putnam RD. The social context of well-being. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2004 Sep 29;359(1449):1435-46. doi: 10.1098/rstb.2004.1522.
Stata analysis software. Stata Corporation, College Station, TX.
Tabachnick, B.G. and Fidell, L.S. Using multivariate statistics, 4th Edition, Allyn & Bacon, Needham, MA. 2001.
Fleiss, J.L. Design and Analysis of Clinical Experiments.1999. Wiley, New York, NY.
MacKinnon DP, Fairchild AJ, Fritz MS. Mediation analysis. Annu Rev Psychol. 2007;58:593-614. doi: 10.1146/annurev.psych.58.110405.085542.
Beasley, T.M. Seemingly unrelated regression (SUR) models as a solution to path analytic models with correlated errors. Multiple Linear Regression Viewpoints. 34(1): 1-7, 2008.
Zellner, A. An efficient method of estimating seemingly unrelated regressions and tests for aggregation bias. J Am Stat Assoc, 57(348-68), 1962.
Lin DY, Fleming TR, De Gruttola V. Estimating the proportion of treatment effect explained by a surrogate marker. Stat Med. 1997 Jul 15;16(13):1515-27. doi: 10.1002/(sici)1097-0258(19970715)16:133.0.co;2-1.
Vittinghoff E, Sen S, McCulloch CE. Sample size calculations for evaluating mediation. Stat Med. 2009 Feb 15;28(4):541-57. doi: 10.1002/sim.3491.
Gleason, T.C. and Staelin, R. A proposal for handling missing data. Psychometrika, 40(2): 229-252, 1975.
Little, R.J. and Rubin, D.B. Statistical analysis with missing data, 2nd Edition, Wiley, New York, NY. 2002.
Schafer, J. L. Analysis of Incomplete Multivariate Data. New York, NY: Chapman & Hall, CRC. 2002.
Cobb NK, Poirier J. Effectiveness of a multimodal online well-being intervention: a randomized controlled trial. Am J Prev Med. 2014 Jan;46(1):41-8. doi: 10.1016/j.amepre.2013.08.018.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
DC-EFF-2012
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.