Effects of Workplace Intervention in Occupational Rehabilitation on Return to Work

NCT ID: NCT02541890

Last Updated: 2021-08-13

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

175 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2015-04-30

Study Completion Date

2018-03-31

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

Aim is to study the effect of a work place intervention during a multicomponent return-to-work rehabilitation program on return-to-work. The intervention is compared with inpatient rehabilitation only, and participants will be recruited from the diagnostic groups dominating the sick-leave statistics, namely musculoskeletal disorders, common mental disorders (e.g. stress, depression and anxiety), and unspecific disorders including chronic fatigue.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Long-term sick-listing from work has considerable impact on social function, on the families of the sick-listed persons, the companies they work for, and society as a whole. Hence, the need for documented effective vocational rehabilitation programs is pressing. Vocational rehabilitation services described in the scientific literature have been specific to one single or a specific group of medical conditions (e.g.low back pain). In contrast, most people on sick leave have several health complaints, and many of the factors influencing sick leave are shared regardless of disorder (e.g. social surroundings, workplace environment), calling for rehabilitation programs that can be employed for both musculoskeletal, unspecific and common mental disorders. Research indicates that interventions on the work place might facilitate return to work. The aim of this study is therefore to investigate the effect of a work place intervention during a multicomponent return-to-work rehabilitation program on return-to-work.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Mental Disorders Musculoskeletal Diseases Fatigue Syndrome, Chronic

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

NONE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Work place intervention

Work place intervention in addition to rehabilitation program.

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Work place intervention

Intervention Type BEHAVIORAL

Meeting at the work place including the patient, the employer and the rehabilitation therapist. Aim of meeting is to discuss challenges and possibilities in the patient's return to work process and to make a plan for return to work.

Rehabilitation program only

Rehabilitation program without intervention at the work place.

Group Type NO_INTERVENTION

No interventions assigned to this group

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Work place intervention

Meeting at the work place including the patient, the employer and the rehabilitation therapist. Aim of meeting is to discuss challenges and possibilities in the patient's return to work process and to make a plan for return to work.

Intervention Type BEHAVIORAL

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Resident of Central Norway
* Sick-listed due to common mental disorders, musculoskeletal pain/problems, unspecific disorders and/or fatigue
* Sick-listed more than 50 %
* Sick-listed longer than 8 weeks
* Has employer and is willing to participate in a work place intervention during the rehabilitation program

Exclusion Criteria

* is self-employed
* has, or is currently examined for, a serious somatic or psychiatric disorder
* suffers from substance abuse
* has trouble with participating in a group
* is in a rehabilitation process that will interfere with the occupational rehabilitation program
* function level is to weak to participate in the rehabilitation program
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

60 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Trondheim University Hospital

OTHER

Sponsor Role collaborator

Norwegian University of Science and Technology

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Marius S Fimland, PhD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Norwegian University of Science and Technology

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Nowegian University of Science and Technology, Department of public health

Trondheim, , Norway

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Norway

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Rise MB, Skagseth M, Klevanger NE, Aasdahl L, Borchgrevink P, Jensen C, Tenggren H, Halsteinli V, Jacobsen TN, Loland SB, Johnsen R, Fimland MS. Design of a study evaluating the effects, health economics, and stakeholder perspectives of a multi-component occupational rehabilitation program with an added workplace intervention - a study protocol. BMC Public Health. 2018 Feb 5;18(1):219. doi: 10.1186/s12889-018-5130-5.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 29402253 (View on PubMed)

Skagseth M, Fimland MS, Rise MB, Johnsen R, Borchgrevink PC, Aasdahl L. Effectiveness of adding a workplace intervention to an inpatient multimodal occupational rehabilitation program: A randomized clinical trial. Scand J Work Environ Health. 2020 Jul 1;46(4):356-363. doi: 10.5271/sjweh.3873. Epub 2019 Dec 13.

Reference Type RESULT
PMID: 31834410 (View on PubMed)

Klevanger NE, Fimland MS, Rise MB. Aligning stakeholders' understandings of the return-to-work process: a qualitative study on workplace meetings in inpatient multimodal occupational rehabilitation. Int J Qual Stud Health Well-being. 2021 Dec;16(1):1946927. doi: 10.1080/17482631.2021.1946927.

Reference Type RESULT
PMID: 34278973 (View on PubMed)

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

2014/2279

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

Promo@Work Entrepreneurs
NCT03648593 UNKNOWN NA
Putting CDSMP to Work
NCT02409056 COMPLETED NA