Effects of a Self-management Course for Adults on Sick-leave
NCT ID: NCT02136056
Last Updated: 2017-12-08
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
NA
600 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2014-09-30
2016-08-01
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
We thus, hypothesize that the program will improve workers return to work rates and self-reported/psychological well-being.
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Previous studies have examined the program with respect to specific chronic diseases (e.g., Arthritis), quality of life, well-being and health-care utilization, though non-otherwise specified workers on sick-leave and return work have not been examined before.
The framework of CDSMP is social-cognitive learning theory in which self-efficacy plays a central role.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Keywords
Explore important study keywords that can help with search, categorization, and topic discovery.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
PREVENTION
NONE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Self-management program (SMP)
Participants in the experimental group receive six weekly group-sessions of self-management and patient education; specifically targeting self-management of the return to work process and disease symptoms.
Self-management program (SMP)
A self-management course
Treatment as usual
Participants in the control-group receive standard rehabilitation care and follow-up in the job-center.
No interventions assigned to this group
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Self-management program (SMP)
A self-management course
Other Intervention Names
Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* Persons who are listed as sick from a job
* Persons who have been categorized as "2 - risk" or "3 - chronic" case by the job-center
* The health problem reflects a chronic or a long-term condition
* The person acknowledges a chronic or long-term condition
* The person wants to work with his or her condition
* The person wants to return to work
* The person volunteers to participate
Exclusion Criteria
* Persons who are categorized as "1 - easy" by the job-center
* The person does not understand or speak danish
* History or signs of aggressive behavior and violence
18 Years
65 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Aarhus University Hospital
OTHER
VIVE - The Danish Center for Social Science Research
OTHER
University of Aarhus
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Martin H Olesen, PhD
Role: STUDY_DIRECTOR
Aarhus University and Aarhus University Hospital
Jan Høgelund, PhD
Role: STUDY_CHAIR
VIVE - The Danish Center for Social Science Research
Mimi Y Mehlsen, PhD
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
University of Aarhus
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
The Danish Comitee for Health Education
Copenhagen, , Denmark
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Bech, P. Clinical Psychometrics. Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell, 2012.
Christensen KS, Fink P, Toft T, Frostholm L, Ornbol E, Olesen F. A brief case-finding questionnaire for common mental disorders: the CMDQ. Fam Pract. 2005 Aug;22(4):448-57. doi: 10.1093/fampra/cmi025. Epub 2005 Apr 6.
Bjorner JB, Damsgaard MT, Watt T, Groenvold M. Tests of data quality, scaling assumptions, and reliability of the Danish SF-36. J Clin Epidemiol. 1998 Nov;51(11):1001-11. doi: 10.1016/s0895-4356(98)00092-4.
Amtmann D, Bamer AM, Cook KF, Askew RL, Noonan VK, Brockway JA. University of Washington self-efficacy scale: a new self-efficacy scale for people with disabilities. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2012 Oct;93(10):1757-65. doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2012.05.001. Epub 2012 May 7.
Franche RL, Krause N. Readiness for return to work following injury or illness: conceptualizing the interpersonal impact of health care, workplace, and insurance factors. J Occup Rehabil. 2002 Dec;12(4):233-56. doi: 10.1023/a:1020270407044.
Nieuwenhuijsen K, Noordik E, van Dijk FJ, van der Klink JJ. Return to work perceptions and actual return to work in workers with common mental disorders. J Occup Rehabil. 2013 Jun;23(2):290-9. doi: 10.1007/s10926-012-9389-6.
Schultz IZ, Crook J, Meloche GR, Berkowitz J, Milner R, Zuberbier OA, Meloche W. Psychosocial factors predictive of occupational low back disability: towards development of a return-to-work model. Pain. 2004 Jan;107(1-2):77-85. doi: 10.1016/j.pain.2003.09.019.
Levesque CS, Williams GC, Elliot D, Pickering MA, Bodenhamer B, Finley PJ. Validating the theoretical structure of the Treatment Self-Regulation Questionnaire (TSRQ) across three different health behaviors. Health Educ Res. 2007 Oct;22(5):691-702. doi: 10.1093/her/cyl148. Epub 2006 Nov 30.
Lorig, K., Stwart, A., Ritter, P., Gonzales, V., Laurent, D., & Lynch, J. Outcome measures for health education and other health care interventions. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications. 1996.
Buysse DJ, Reynolds CF 3rd, Monk TH, Berman SR, Kupfer DJ. The Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index: a new instrument for psychiatric practice and research. Psychiatry Res. 1989 May;28(2):193-213. doi: 10.1016/0165-1781(89)90047-4.
Marks R, Allegrante JP, Lorig K. A review and synthesis of research evidence for self-efficacy-enhancing interventions for reducing chronic disability: implications for health education practice (part I). Health Promot Pract. 2005 Jan;6(1):37-43. doi: 10.1177/1524839904266790.
Marks R, Allegrante JP, Lorig K. A review and synthesis of research evidence for self-efficacy-enhancing interventions for reducing chronic disability: implications for health education practice (part II). Health Promot Pract. 2005 Apr;6(2):148-56. doi: 10.1177/1524839904266792.
Lorig K, Laurent DD, Plant K, Krishnan E, Ritter PL. The components of action planning and their associations with behavior and health outcomes. Chronic Illn. 2014 Mar;10(1):50-9. doi: 10.1177/1742395313495572. Epub 2013 Jul 9.
Broadbent E, Petrie KJ, Main J, Weinman J. The brief illness perception questionnaire. J Psychosom Res. 2006 Jun;60(6):631-7. doi: 10.1016/j.jpsychores.2005.10.020.
Morisky DE, DiMatteo MR. Improving the measurement of self-reported medication nonadherence: response to authors. J Clin Epidemiol. 2011 Mar;64(3):255-7; discussion 258-63. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2010.09.002. Epub 2010 Dec 8. No abstract available.
Related Links
Access external resources that provide additional context or updates about the study.
Web-page that describes the course
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
auh_JOS_sfi-01
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id