Evaluation of a Collaborative Intervention to Promote Employer Contact and RTW Among People With CMD or Chronic Pain
NCT ID: NCT05216861
Last Updated: 2024-05-08
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
RECRUITING
NA
120 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2022-02-15
2025-12-21
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Effects of Workplace Intervention in Occupational Rehabilitation on Return to Work
NCT02541890
Joint Coordination to Facilitate the Transition From Sick Leave to Employment
NCT03348410
Effects of Motivational Interviewing for Long-term Sick Absence
NCT03212118
Return to Work After a Workplace-oriented Intervention for Patients on Sick Leave Due to Burnout
NCT01039168
Evaluation of Return to Work Rehabilitation
NCT01926574
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Furthermore, the aim is to identify hindering and facilitating factors for feasibility, usability and implementation of the Demand and Ability Protocol intervention (DAP) in primary health care.
Research questions:
1. What is the effect of DAP for patients regarding sick leave, health, work ability, and trust in the manager compared to matched controls who do not recieve DAP?
2. How do patients and managers experience their participation in the intervention and how do they experience the usability of the DAP?
3. What facilitating and hindering factors exist for the introduction and implementation of DAP in primary health care, and how do rehabilitation coordinators (REKO) and medical doctors experience the feasibility and usability of the intervention?
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
NON_RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
TREATMENT
SINGLE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Experimental
The rehabilitation coordinators are trained in the intervention (0,5 day).
Demand and ability protocol
The intervention consists of a structured conversation between the patient and his immediate manager under the guidance of licensed medical staff (in this case REKO) with knowledge of the requirements of the patient's work and his/her current functional ability. The intervention takes about 90 minutes excluding preparation time for REKO.
DAP consider the following domains; 1) mental and cognitive ability, 2) basic skills and social ability, 3) tolerance for physical conditions, 4) ability to work dynamically, 5) ability to work statically and 6) to be able to work certain times.
Based on the above domains, a structured review is made of the balance between requirements and function in current work in order to identify possible adaptations and measures at the workplace. During the intervention, the work requirements and the patient's function/ability are identified on a three-point scale and in domains where there is thus an imbalance adjustments or changed tasks are identified.
Active comparator
Participants in the experimental arm will be matched with controls from the Micro Data for the Analysis of Social Insurance register (MiDAS) from the Social Insurance Agency, Sweden.
Collaborative interventions as usual
The rehabilitation coordinator conduct collaborative interventions as usual with patient and employer. This might be through phone calls are unstructured meetings.
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Demand and ability protocol
The intervention consists of a structured conversation between the patient and his immediate manager under the guidance of licensed medical staff (in this case REKO) with knowledge of the requirements of the patient's work and his/her current functional ability. The intervention takes about 90 minutes excluding preparation time for REKO.
DAP consider the following domains; 1) mental and cognitive ability, 2) basic skills and social ability, 3) tolerance for physical conditions, 4) ability to work dynamically, 5) ability to work statically and 6) to be able to work certain times.
Based on the above domains, a structured review is made of the balance between requirements and function in current work in order to identify possible adaptations and measures at the workplace. During the intervention, the work requirements and the patient's function/ability are identified on a three-point scale and in domains where there is thus an imbalance adjustments or changed tasks are identified.
Collaborative interventions as usual
The rehabilitation coordinator conduct collaborative interventions as usual with patient and employer. This might be through phone calls are unstructured meetings.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* have a job
* be on full-time or part time sick leave
* accept the manager's involvement.
Exclusion Criteria
18 Years
65 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Uppsala University Hospital
OTHER
Uppsala University
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Therese Hellman
PhD, Associate professor
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Therese Hellman, PhD
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Uppsala University
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Region Uppsala
Uppsala, Uppsala County, Sweden
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Central Contacts
Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.
Facility Contacts
Find local site contact details for specific facilities participating in the trial.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
RFR-968570
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.