Comparison of Mechanical Bowel Preparation Versus Enema for Candidates to Colorectal Resection for Adenocarcinoma

NCT ID: NCT00940030

Last Updated: 2018-11-07

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

440 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2007-10-31

Study Completion Date

2017-12-31

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

The purpose of this study is to evaluate mechanical bowel preparation (MBP) with polyethylene glycol plus bowel enema versus bowel enema alone in patients candidates to colorectal resection for malignancy.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Surgical site infections (SSI) in colorectal surgery (anastomotic leakage, wound infection, intraabdominal abscess) are associated with increased mortality, postoperative hospital stay and costs. From a recent metanalysis and randomized clinical trial there is the emerging evidence that mechanical bowel preparation (MBP) before elective colorectal surgery is not associated with reduction of SIS, although it causes high discomfort for patients. On the same way other more recent studies show that MBP may cause an higher incidence of SIS, and that MBP may alter the bowel mucosa morphology. Other Authors report an increased incidence of anastomotic leakage requiring surgery for patients undergoing a single preoperative phosphate enema whereas but an higher cardiovascular mortality for patients undergoing MBP. Two recent studies do not clarify the usefulness of MBP for reducing SIS after colorectal surgery and one stage anastomosis. For these reasons a more precise understanding of the relationship between MBP and SIS could increase patients satisfaction and decrease unnecessary procedures and costs. At this point MBP represent the clinical standard for patients undergoing elective colorectal surgery at the European Institute of Oncology.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Colorectal Cancer

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

NONE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

MBP+enema

mechanical bowel preparation and enema

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

mechanical bowel preparation

Intervention Type OTHER

fiberless diet starting 2 days before surgery. Drugs containing iron and coal plant will be stopped. Free breakfast the day before surgery. Lunch: meat broth and white meat. From 16 p. m. to 20 p. m. assumption of Polyethylene Glycol Macrogol 70 mg per 1 liter of water 4 times (1L each hour). A bowel enema (2L, glycerin 5%) will be administered at 6 a. m. the day of surgery.

enema

Intervention Type OTHER

fiberless diet starting 2 days before surgery. Drugs containing iron and coal plant will be stopped. Free breakfast the day before surgery. Lunch: meat broth and white meat. Dinner: meat broth and fasting starting from midnight. A bowel single enema (2L, glycerin 5%) will be administered at 6 a. m. the day of surgery.

enema

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

enema

Intervention Type OTHER

fiberless diet starting 2 days before surgery. Drugs containing iron and coal plant will be stopped. Free breakfast the day before surgery. Lunch: meat broth and white meat. Dinner: meat broth and fasting starting from midnight. A bowel single enema (2L, glycerin 5%) will be administered at 6 a. m. the day of surgery.

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

mechanical bowel preparation

fiberless diet starting 2 days before surgery. Drugs containing iron and coal plant will be stopped. Free breakfast the day before surgery. Lunch: meat broth and white meat. From 16 p. m. to 20 p. m. assumption of Polyethylene Glycol Macrogol 70 mg per 1 liter of water 4 times (1L each hour). A bowel enema (2L, glycerin 5%) will be administered at 6 a. m. the day of surgery.

Intervention Type OTHER

enema

fiberless diet starting 2 days before surgery. Drugs containing iron and coal plant will be stopped. Free breakfast the day before surgery. Lunch: meat broth and white meat. Dinner: meat broth and fasting starting from midnight. A bowel single enema (2L, glycerin 5%) will be administered at 6 a. m. the day of surgery.

Intervention Type OTHER

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Patients candidates to colorectal surgery for histologically confirmed colorectal cancer
* Age 18-80 years
* Obtained written consent

Exclusion Criteria

* Patients at high risk for receiving a stoma (e. g. patients affected by distal rectal cancer \<5cm from the anal verge; patients whose tumour is located \>5 cm from the anal verge who underwent neoadjuvant CT-RT without downstaging or tumour shrinkage
* Intestinal obstruction
* Emergency procedures
* Patients who underwent colonoscopy within 7 day from surgery
* ASA 4-5 patients
* Patients unable to give informed consent
* Renal failure (serum creatinine \>3 mg/dl)
* Pregnant women
* Breast feeding women
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

80 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

European Institute of Oncology

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Bruno Andreoni, MD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

European Institute of Oncology

Roberto Biffi, MD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

European Institute of Oncology

Emilio Bertani, MD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

European Institute of Oncolgy

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

European Institute of Oncology

Milan, , Italy

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Italy

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

IEO S357/307

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

Enteral Stents for Colonic Obstruction
NCT00591695 COMPLETED PHASE4
Gut Oxygenation and Laparoscopy
NCT01040013 COMPLETED PHASE2