Rectal Cancer Surgery Without Mechanical Bowel Preparation

NCT ID: NCT00554892

Last Updated: 2010-06-30

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

186 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2007-09-30

Study Completion Date

2009-08-31

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

The aim of this controlled multicentric study is to assess rectal cancer surgery with sphincter preservation without pre operative mechanical bowel preparation

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Preoperative mechanical bowel preparation (MBP) (i.e. including oral laxatives, retrograde enemas and/or oral diet before surgery) is the standard practice in colorectal surgery. The importance of MBP in preventing anastomotic leakage and infectious morbidity after elective colorectal surgery has been a dogma among surgeons for many years. The main reason is the belief that postoperative complications is related to septic bowel content. However, there is a paucity of scientific evidence demonstrating the efficacy of this practice in reducing morbidity. Moreover, potential disadvantages of MBP include the requirement for a longer preoperative duration of admission before surgery, its time consuming nature, being expensive and unpleasant for the patient and expose the early population to the particular risk of fluid and electrolyte imbalance .At least eight randomized clinical trials and two meta-analyses failed to show any superiority of MBP in colorectal surgery. On the contrary, they demonstrated that preparation might lead to an increased rate of septic complications. Such initial dates lead surgeons to re-evaluate their current clinical practice in colonic surgery. But to dates, these findings cannot finally be applied to rectal surgery because of insufficient dates. To date, no study about MBP was specifically devoted to rectal surgery. Moreover, it is currently admitted that the risk of septic complications following rectal resection, as a result of the well-known risk factors, is higher than after colonic preparation. It is the reason why most of the colorectal surgeons consider that a no preparation regimen in rectal cancer surgery could represent an additive risk factor for postoperative morbidity.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Patients With Rectal Cancer

Keywords

Explore important study keywords that can help with search, categorization, and topic discovery.

Rectal cancer Sphincter preservation Mechanical bowel preparation Post operative morbidity Anastomotic leakage

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

NONE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

1

Bowel preparation

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

bowel preparation

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

oral laxatives, retrograde enemas

2

without bowel preparation

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

no preparation bowel

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

no preparation bowel

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

bowel preparation

oral laxatives, retrograde enemas

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

no preparation bowel

no preparation bowel

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Age \> 18 years
* patient with rectal cancer without any metastasesRectal excision with sphincter preservation with colorectal or coloanal anastomosis (with or without temporary ileostomy)

Exclusion Criteria

* Stage IV disease
* Comorbidity with post operative infectious risk corticoids,immunodeficiency, Crohn's disease, ulcerative colitis ...)
* Abdominoperineal resection
* Emergency surgery
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Assistance Publique - Hôpitaux de Paris

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Department Clinical Research of Developpement

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

PANIS Yves, Pr

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Assistance Publique - Hôpitaux de Paris

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

CHU

Angers, , France

Site Status

Hopital Saint André

Bordeaux, , France

Site Status

Hopital Ambroise Paré

Boulognes Billancourt, , France

Site Status

CHU

Clermont-Ferrand, , France

Site Status

Hôpital Beaujon

Clichy, , France

Site Status

Hopital Nord

Marseille, , France

Site Status

Institut Paoli Calmette

Marseille, , France

Site Status

CRLC Val d'Aurelle

Montpellier, , France

Site Status

Hopital Cochin

Paris, , France

Site Status

CHU Purpan

Toulouse, , France

Site Status

CHRU Trousseau

Tours, , France

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

France

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Bretagnol F, Panis Y, Rullier E, Rouanet P, Berdah S, Dousset B, Portier G, Benoist S, Chipponi J, Vicaut E; French Research Group of Rectal Cancer Surgery (GRECCAR). Rectal cancer surgery with or without bowel preparation: The French GRECCAR III multicenter single-blinded randomized trial. Ann Surg. 2010 Nov;252(5):863-8. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0b013e3181fd8ea9.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 21037443 (View on PubMed)

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

AOM 06086

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: secondary_id

IDRCB 2007-A00471

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: secondary_id

P060233

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id