Enteral Stents for Colonic Obstruction

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

PHASE4

Total Enrollment

144 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2008-01-31

Study Completion Date

2015-11-30

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

The purpose of this study is to verify whether stent positioning for malignant obstruction of the colon and rectum followed by elective surgery allows reduction of postoperative complications and hospital stay without worsening of evolution of the neoplastic illness, compared to emergency surgery.

Primary endpoint will be 60 days postoperative morbidity. Others endpoints will be postoperative mortality, length of hospital stay, need for analgesia.

Related Clinical Trials

Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.

Endolaparoscopic Versus Immediate Surgery for Obstructing Colorectal Cancers

NCT00164879

Colorectal Cancer Bowel Obstruction

UNKNOWN PHASE3

Stenting and Resection for Stage IV Colorectal Cancer Endoscopic Stenting and Colorectal Resection in Stage IV

NCT03451643

Colorectal Neoplasm

UNKNOWN NA

Study of Intraoperative Colonic Irrigation Versus Stent Placement in Obstructive Left-Sided Colonic Cancer

NCT01196494

Colon Neoplasm Colorectal Surgery Intestinal Obstruction

TERMINATED NA

Colonic Stenting With Elective Surgery Versus Emergency Surgery in the Management of Acute Malignant Colonic Obstruction

NCT01997684

Acute Malignant Colonic Obstruction Colorectal Cancer Colonic Obstruction

UNKNOWN NA

Long-term Outcomes of Colonic Stent as a "Bridge to Surgery" for Malignant Large-bowel Obstruction

NCT04111042

Stent Occlusion Long-term Oncologic Results

COMPLETED

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Introduction \& background In emergency surgery, although surgical and resuscitation techniques were improved, the postoperative complications and mortality rates are still high and however higher than for those patients that underwent to elective surgery (1-3). Using a Metallic prosthesis stent in an obstructed colon allows to transform an emergency surgical case into an elective surgery case. This allows to restore the bowel transit and to operate in elective condition reducing morbidity, mortality and the need of an enterostomy (4-10).

Although there are recent outcomes on literature about use of a decompressive stent before surgery in obstructed patients from malignant colic tumours, there are no prospective and randomised studies were stent positioning followed by elective surgery is compared with emergency surgery.

Study design Prospective, randomized multicentric clinical trial where samples are patients with emergency room diagnosis of obstructing colonic neoplasm.

Once informed and obtained consent, patients will be included in the study and randomized in one of the two branches of the study: A.- enteral stent positioning followed by second time resection in the same hospital stay. B.- emergency surgical treatment consisting in Hartmann operation or resection with same time anastomosis. Results from transit reconstruction in patients underwent Hartmann operation will be considered in the study.

Short term clinical evolution control in order to determine postoperative morbility and mortality, hospital stay.

Follow-up will be performed to evaluate survival rate and disease free survival.

Endpoints To evaluate and compare the results obtained using enteral stent followed by elective surgery versus common emergency surgical techniques.

Primary endpoint will be 60 days postoperative morbidity. Others endpoints will be: postoperative mortality, length of hospital stay, need for analgesia. Long term follow up with specific instrumental controls (CT scan, US, colonoscopy or RX clysma) to identify disease recurrences or metastases as cost analysis and patient's quality of life will also be evaluated.

Statistics \& randomization In prospective series analysed in different centres, the incidence of postoperative complications in patients underwent to emergency colonic surgery was 35%. The positioning of the stent associated to second time surgical elective treatment is characterized by 15% of morbidity (stent: 5%, surgery: 10%). The number of patients needed to carry on the study making statistically significant this difference (35% vs 15%) with an error alpha = 0.05 and beta = 0.2 and estimating a loss of 5% of the samples, is 72 patients in each group.

Randomization will be stratified for local extension of tumour (T4 vs others) and for presence or not of liver metastases.

Main selection criteria Inclusion of patients with malignant colonic obstruction localized between promontorium and splenic flexure and diagnosed by CTScan. Those patients with peritonitis, pneumoperitoneum, synchronic colonic tumour, pregnant or haemodynamic instability will be excluded.

Follow-up Same follow-up as patients diagnosed and treated for Colon Cancer following the protocol of each center, never less than 3 years. During follow-up required complementary studies will be performed in each case in order to evaluate local recurrence or distant metastases. Also quality of life and costs will be evaluated.

Expected results: reduction of postoperative complications and hospital stay in patients submitted to stent positioning without worsening of evolution of the neoplastic illness.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Malignant Colorectal Obstruction

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

NONE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

A

positioning in emergency of a prosthetic metallic self-expanding stent followed, in case of successful colic decompression, by an elective surgical (laparoscopic or open) resection of the tumour

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Stent bridge to surgery + elective surgery

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

positioning in emergency of a metallic self-expanding stent followed, in case of successful colic decompression, by an elective surgical (laparoscopic or open) resection of the tumour

B

emergency surgery performed in these ways: Resection followed by enterostomy (Hartmann procedure), 'On table' washing and primary anastomoses, Subtotal colectomy

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Emergency Surgery

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Emergency surgery performed in these ways: Resection followed by enterostomy (Hartmann procedure), 'On table' washing and primary anastomoses, Subtotal colectomy

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Stent bridge to surgery + elective surgery

positioning in emergency of a metallic self-expanding stent followed, in case of successful colic decompression, by an elective surgical (laparoscopic or open) resection of the tumour

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Emergency Surgery

Emergency surgery performed in these ways: Resection followed by enterostomy (Hartmann procedure), 'On table' washing and primary anastomoses, Subtotal colectomy

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Other Intervention Names

Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.

Colorectal stenting with metallic self-expanding stent + elective surgery Resection followed by enterostomy (Hartmann procedure) 'On table' washing and primary anastomoses Subtotal colectomy

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* malignant colonic obstruction localized between splenic flexure and 15 cm from anal margin diagnosed by CTScan.
* Possibility of endoscopy and stent location during next 24 h after diagnostic.
* Clinical occlusion to gas and faeces.
* Informed consent obtained from the patient or from a relative in case of inability.

Exclusion Criteria

* Bowel perforation diagnosed by clinical exploration and complementary studies.
* Associated pathologies contraindicating general anaesthesia and/or haemodynamic instability.
* Impossibility to gain a valid informed consent or refusal from the patient.
* Patients with multiple liver metastases diagnosed by CTScan at the moment of diagnostic and not considered operable with curative intention following the standards of every center.

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No