Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
UNKNOWN
NA
100 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2006-10-31
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
A Comparative Analysis of Biomaterials for Retrograde Filling in Apical Surgery.
NCT07246512
Sealers in Chronic Apical Lesions
NCT07339579
Minimal Instrumentation With Intracanal Heating and Activation of Sodium Hypochlorite for the Management of Teeth With Periapical Lesions
NCT06461728
Effect of Different Apex Locators on Postoperative Pain in Endodontic Retreatment of Single-Rooted Teeth: Prospective Randomized Clinical Study
NCT06964490
Periapical Bone Healing After Apicectomy With and Without Retrograde Root Filling
NCT00228280
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Not all lesions heal accordingly. Those which fail to heal are subjected to either non-surgical re-treatment or to a surgical procedure called "apicoectomy" (Kim \& Kratchman 2006). The surgical procedure consists of cutting the gums, accessing the periapical tissue through a hole drilled in the cortical bone, followed by curetting the soft tissue out of its bony crypt. After such surgical procedure, bone healing is much quicker (Kvist \& Reit 1999) and even relatively large lesions may heal within 3-6 months. Nevertheless, pain and swelling usually inflict great discomfort causing patients to lose up to 6 working days (Kvist \& Reit 2000).
It is common practice to delay the final dental restoration (crown or bridge) for as long as the periapical lesion has not healed. Even though a surgical intervention could significantly reduce the waiting time, it is not commonly applied due to following: (a) Pain, discomfort and loss of working days, (b) High cost (c) Inaccessibility of many root tips, due to anatomical reasons.
Apexum has developed a family of miniature, minimally invasive surgical tools, facilitating highly innovative methods for the treatment of periapical lesions associated with root canal infection. The Apexum Ablator device allows access to the periapical tissues through the root-canal following the commonly accepted root-canal procedures. The inserted tool grinds the periapical lesion, followed by washing out and aspiration of the ground material.
In the present study, the safety and efficacy of the Apexum Ablator will be assessed in patients with periapical lesions associated with root canal infection by using this clinical investigational plan.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
TREATMENT
DOUBLE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Apexum
the tooth is treated by a standard root canal treatment, supplemented by Apexum Ablator protocol, in which the periapical lesion tissue is minced and removed through the root canal, in a minimally invasive fashion.
the Apexum Protocol
using the apexum kit for minimally invasive removal of periapical lesion tissue.
Conventional endodontic procedure
Standard root canal treatment
Control
the tooth is subject to conventional endodontic procedure alone, (standard root canal treatment)
Conventional endodontic procedure
Standard root canal treatment
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
the Apexum Protocol
using the apexum kit for minimally invasive removal of periapical lesion tissue.
Conventional endodontic procedure
Standard root canal treatment
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
2. Subject has periapical lesion(s) associated with root canal infection in one or more roots that have a single root canal per root. These may include upper and lower single rooted incisors, canines or premolars, as well as roots of multi-rooted teeth, providing that they have a single root canal per root. These may include distal roots of lower molars, palatal and disto-buccal roots of upper molars
3. Lesion mean diameter: 3-6 mm, PAI score 4 or 5
4. Roots with mature fully formed apices
Exclusion Criteria
2. Roots with abnormal root canal morphology
3. Roots with more than one root canal per root, as either evident from the pre-operative radiographs or as discovered during initiation of the root canal treatment
4. A tooth that remained symptomatic after the first and when needed a second session of the root canal treatment (remained with an excessive sensitivity to percussion, persistent sinus tract, persistent exudate in the root canal etc.)
5. Un-restorable teeth
6. Significant periodontal pockets
7. Lack of cortical bone around the lesion, as judged clinically
8. Active acute infection - cellulites, abcess
9. Proximity of anatomical structures to the periapical lesion to the extent that Apexum Ablator enucleation procedure may damage or otherwise jeopardize these structures. Such anatomical structures may include the maxillary sinus, the nasal cavity, the inferior alveolar nerve and its canal, the mental nerve or any other structure that may be jeopardized by the procedure
10. Subject with:
* Uncontrolled systemic hypertension
* Severe uncontrolled Diabetes Mellitus
* Current steroid therapy in excess of prednisone 5 mg/day
* Chronic inflammatory oral disease
* HIV positive patients
* Chronic renal failure
* Hematological disease (malignancy, severe anemia, bleeding tendency etc.)
* Osteoporosis, receiving biphosphonates
* Post head and neck irradiation treatment
* In need of endocarditis antibiotic prophylactic treatment \[sub acute bacterial endocarditis (SBE\]
11. Other severe or life-threatening systemic disease (ASA P3 and above)
18 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Monitoring: Quail CRO, Romania
UNKNOWN
Medistat Ltd., Israel
INDUSTRY
Apexum Ltd.
INDUSTRY
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Apexum Ltd.
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Dragos Slavescu, DMD
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Titu Maiorescu University
Dan Dragomirescu, DMD
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Cabinet Stomatologic Dr Dan Dragomirescu
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Titu Maiorescu University
Bucharest, , Romania
Cabinet Stomatologic Dr Dan Dragomirescu
Timișoara, , Romania
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Central Contacts
Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
Apexum Trial
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.