Comparing Different Electronic Apex Locators and Periapical Radiography on Postoperative Pain

NCT ID: NCT07271797

Last Updated: 2025-12-09

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

125 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2023-10-01

Study Completion Date

2025-08-01

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

This clinical study was conducted to better understand whether the method used to measure the length of root canals affects the amount of pain patients feel after root canal treatment. Accurate measurement of the root canal is important to clean and fill the tooth properly. If the canal is cleaned too short or too far, it may cause discomfort or reduce the success of the treatment.The study included 125 adult patients who had deep decay but no current pain or swelling. All had single-rooted teeth diagnosed with asymptomatic irreversible pulpitis. Participants were randomly divided into five groups, each using a different method to measure the root canal length before treatment. Four of the methods used electronic devices (called apex locators), and one used a dental X-ray. None of the patients knew which method was used in their case, and all treatments were done by the same dentist in a single appointment.Pain levels were recorded using a simple pain scale called the Visual Analog Scale (VAS), where patients marked their pain level at 6, 12, 24, and 48 hours after treatment. Patients were also allowed to take painkillers if needed, and they were asked to record how many tablets they used.The study also looked at factors like age, gender, the location of the treated tooth, and use of pain medication. The study was carried out at Bezmialem Vakif University's Department of Endodontics. All participants gave written consent, and the study was approved by the university's ethics committee. No complications or serious side effects were reported during or after the treatment.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

This clinical study aimed to investigate whether the method used to determine root canal length has an effect on postoperative pain following root canal treatment. Accurate measurement of the root canal is crucial for successful cleaning and sealing of the root system. If the measurement is too short or too long, it may lead to discomfort or compromise treatment outcomes.

The study enrolled 125 adult patients who had deep dental caries but were not experiencing any active pain or swelling at the time of diagnosis. All patients had single-rooted teeth diagnosed with asymptomatic irreversible pulpitis, a condition in which the pulp is irreversibly damaged but does not yet cause symptoms. Eligible participants were randomly assigned to one of five groups, each using a different method for working length determination prior to treatment. Four groups used electronic apex locators (Root ZX, Propex Pixi, Woodpex III, and Raypex 6), while one group used periapical radiography (dental X-ray). Treatments were carried out by the same experienced clinician during a single appointment. Patients were blinded to the method used in their treatment.

To evaluate postoperative discomfort, pain levels were assessed using the Visual Analog Scale (VAS), a 10-centimeter scale where patients mark their pain level ranging from "no pain" to "worst imaginable pain." VAS scores were recorded at 6, 12, 24, and 48 hours after treatment. Patients were allowed to take over-the-counter pain medication (400 mg ibuprofen) if necessary, and they were instructed to record how many tablets they took each day.

In addition to pain levels, the study evaluated other potential contributing factors such as patient age, gender, the location of the treated tooth (upper or lower jaw), and use of analgesics. The data were analyzed to determine whether these factors were associated with differences in pain perception among groups.

This study was conducted at the Department of Endodontics, Faculty of Dentistry, Bezmialem Vakif University (Istanbul, Türkiye). Written informed consent was obtained from all participants, and the study protocol was approved by the university's ethics committee. No adverse events or complications were reported during or after the procedures.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Postoperative Acute Pain

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Randomized, single-centre endodontic trial; single visit treatment; differeant electronic apex locators.
Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

TRIPLE

Participants Caregivers Outcome Assessors
In this single-blind clinical trial, participants were unaware of which electronic apex locator was used during root canal treatment. The operator performing the procedure knew the device allocation, but the postoperative pain data were collected by an independent investigator who was blinded to the device used.

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Group 1

Identifies patients who underwent root canal treatment using Root ZX (Morita Corp., Tokyo, Japan)

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Root ZX (Morita Corp., Tokyo, Japan)

Intervention Type DEVICE

Root ZX (Morita Corp., Tokyo, Japan) is a well-established electronic apex locator widely used in endodontics for determining working length during root canal procedures. It operates based on the ratio method and has been shown to provide reliable and accurate measurements even in the presence of various irrigants. Root ZX has been extensively validated in clinical and laboratory studies and is considered a gold standard among apex locators.

Group 2

Identifies patients who underwent root canal treatment using Propex Pixi (Dentsply Maillefer, Ballaigues, Switzerland)

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Propex Pixi (Dentsply Maillefer, Ballaigues, Switzerland)

Intervention Type DEVICE

Propex Pixi (Dentsply Maillefer, Ballaigues, Switzerland) is a compact electronic apex locator designed to determine the working length of root canals with high accuracy. It uses advanced multi-frequency technology to detect the position of the apical foramen and provides real-time feedback through visual and audible signals. Despite its small size, Propex Pixi has demonstrated reliable performance in various clinical settings.

Group 3

Identifies patients who underwent root canal treatment using Woodpex III (Woodpecker Medical Instrument Co., Guilin, China)

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Woodpex III (Woodpecker Medical Instrument Co., Guilin, China)

Intervention Type DEVICE

Woodpex III (Woodpecker Medical Instrument Co., Guilin, China) is an electronic apex locator that operates using dual-frequency impedance technology to determine the working length of root canals. It features a user-friendly interface with visual and audible indicators, making it suitable for routine clinical use. While it is considered a cost-effective alternative to premium apex locators, studies have shown variable accuracy depending on canal conditions and the presence of irrigants.

Group 4

Identifies patients who underwent root canal treatment using Raypex 6 (VDW, Munich, Germany)

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Raypex 6 (VDW, Munich, Germany)

Intervention Type DEVICE

Raypex 6 (VDW, Munich, Germany) is a modern electronic apex locator that utilizes multi-frequency technology to accurately detect the apical constriction during root canal procedures. It features a color-coded graphical display and audible signals to guide clinicians throughout the procedure. Raypex 6 has been reported to provide reliable working length measurements even under challenging clinical conditions.

Group 5

Describe patients who underwent root canal treatment using periapical radiography.

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

periapical radiography

Intervention Type DEVICE

Working length determination using periapical radiography involves placing a small endodontic file inside the root canal and taking a radiograph to estimate the position of the file tip relative to the root apex. This traditional technique is widely used but may be limited by image distortion, anatomical variations, and the two-dimensional nature of radiographs. Despite its limitations, it remains a common reference method in endodontic practice.

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Root ZX (Morita Corp., Tokyo, Japan)

Root ZX (Morita Corp., Tokyo, Japan) is a well-established electronic apex locator widely used in endodontics for determining working length during root canal procedures. It operates based on the ratio method and has been shown to provide reliable and accurate measurements even in the presence of various irrigants. Root ZX has been extensively validated in clinical and laboratory studies and is considered a gold standard among apex locators.

Intervention Type DEVICE

Propex Pixi (Dentsply Maillefer, Ballaigues, Switzerland)

Propex Pixi (Dentsply Maillefer, Ballaigues, Switzerland) is a compact electronic apex locator designed to determine the working length of root canals with high accuracy. It uses advanced multi-frequency technology to detect the position of the apical foramen and provides real-time feedback through visual and audible signals. Despite its small size, Propex Pixi has demonstrated reliable performance in various clinical settings.

Intervention Type DEVICE

Woodpex III (Woodpecker Medical Instrument Co., Guilin, China)

Woodpex III (Woodpecker Medical Instrument Co., Guilin, China) is an electronic apex locator that operates using dual-frequency impedance technology to determine the working length of root canals. It features a user-friendly interface with visual and audible indicators, making it suitable for routine clinical use. While it is considered a cost-effective alternative to premium apex locators, studies have shown variable accuracy depending on canal conditions and the presence of irrigants.

Intervention Type DEVICE

Raypex 6 (VDW, Munich, Germany)

Raypex 6 (VDW, Munich, Germany) is a modern electronic apex locator that utilizes multi-frequency technology to accurately detect the apical constriction during root canal procedures. It features a color-coded graphical display and audible signals to guide clinicians throughout the procedure. Raypex 6 has been reported to provide reliable working length measurements even under challenging clinical conditions.

Intervention Type DEVICE

periapical radiography

Working length determination using periapical radiography involves placing a small endodontic file inside the root canal and taking a radiograph to estimate the position of the file tip relative to the root apex. This traditional technique is widely used but may be limited by image distortion, anatomical variations, and the two-dimensional nature of radiographs. Despite its limitations, it remains a common reference method in endodontic practice.

Intervention Type DEVICE

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Patients must meet all of the following criteria to be included in the trial:
* Aged between 18 and 60 years.
* Diagnosed with asymptomatic irreversible pulpitis in a single-rooted tooth and scheduled for primary root canal treatment in that tooth.
* In good general health, with no systemic diseases.
* No use of any analgesic medications within the last 24 hours prior to the treatment.
* Willing to participate in the study and able to give informed consent.
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

60 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Bezmialem Vakif University

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Bezmialem Vakıf University

Istanbul, , Turkey (Türkiye)

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Turkey (Türkiye)

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

20210816

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

Sealers in Chronic Apical Lesions
NCT07339579 COMPLETED NA