Outcome of Bone Window Approach in Endodontic Microsurgery Using Novel Piezoelectric Device

NCT ID: NCT06587048

Last Updated: 2024-09-19

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

RECRUITING

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

40 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2023-09-01

Study Completion Date

2025-05-01

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

The Bone window technique provides excellent access to the surgical site while preserving cortical bone in cases of tooth with large periapical lesion and an intact cortical plate. Traditionally, rotary burs and a bone chisel were used to create a bone window. Piezoelectric bone surgery, on the other hand, is an innovative technique that uses thin osteotomy instrument to selectively cut hard tissue while preserving soft tissues. To the best of our knowledge, no study comparing the results of a bone lid using a piezoelectric device and a conventional bur is currently available.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Endodontic microsurgery is the treatment option frequently opted to manage endodontically failed cases with persistent apical periodontitis, after nonsurgical root canal treatment (1,2). Contemporary surgical endodontic therapy using dental operating microscope enables a more precise technique with no or little bevel of root-end excision and retrograde canal preparation with an ultrasonic tip to a depth of 3-4 mm (3). The cumulative loss of cortical bone may further result in slowed or unsuccessful healing at the surgical site as a result of the disease process and/or the removal of cortical plates during a surgical procedure (4,5). According to the animal histologic sections, the cortical plate heals slowest, with a 70% healing rate at the 6-month follow-up. Von Arx et al reported that only 54.1% of patients demonstrated complete cortical plate healing at the end of one-year follow-up when assessed by cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) (6). The degree of cortical plate loss and its limited capacity for regeneration may necessitate the use of regenerative methods involving graft materials.

A novel and minimally invasive procedure called the bone window approach to the apical region aims to preserve more bony structure and the structural integrity of the healthy cortical plate. The bone window also functions as autologous graft material, which has been recognized as the gold standard for regeneration without the need for additional substitute materials (7,8). For obtaining bone window, use of traditional burs in combination with chisels, reciprocating or oscillating saws and lasers have been reported in literature. Piezoelectric bone surgery is an innovative technology that has gained popularity in recent years. It makes use of thin osteotomy instruments that enable selective hard tissue cutting while safeguarding soft tissues (9). This technique is not only clinically effective, but histological and histomorphometric evidence of wound healing and bone formation in experimental animal models has shown that tissue response is better in piezo surgery than in conventional bone-cutting techniques such as diamond or carbide rotary instruments (10-12).

In cases of large periapical lesions where the buccal cortical plate is intact, the application of the piezoelectric device has recently been reported in case reports to create a bony window on buccal bone (13, 14). In a recent randomized trial (15), piezo surgery was compared to traditional microsurgery to assess haemorrhage control and patient postoperative quality of life. In a recent randomized trial (16) comparing bone lid technique over traditional technique in the surgical management of mandibular lesions, the bone lid technique using a piezoelectric device was found to be safe and effective for treating lesions in the posterior mandibular region and was associated with less postoperative complications. The bone lid approach has been used in the literature on oral and maxillofacial surgery for a number of procedures, including root-end surgery, cystic enucleation, impacted tooth extraction, implant explantation, and access to the maxillary sinus for the removal of cysts or foreign bodies. The review concluded that the included clinical studies were of low quality evidence, and that randomized clinical trials were necessary to compare the effectiveness of the bone lid technique to other methods. Furthermore, the best cutting tool for fashioning bone lids has not yet been identified (17).

The transition of endodontic diagnosis and treatment planning from two dimensions to three dimensions is facilitated by CBCT scanning, which also shows the location of anatomical structures in three dimensions, provides precise measurements in depth and length, and enhances localization of the periapical lesion (18, 19). Furthermore, CBCT imaging has high sensitivity to detect the presence of a bony defect in the cortical plate and precisely measure its thickness (20, 21, 22).

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Periapical Lesions Chronic Apical Periodontitis of Pulpal Origin

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

SINGLE

Outcome Assessors

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Piezo group

The bone window osteotomy will be created with a piezoelectric device during endodontic microsurgery

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

periapical surgery

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

In piezo group, the periapical surgery will be performed using piezoelectric device.

conventional bur group

The bone window osteotomy will be created with a conventional rotary burs in slow-speed handpiece during endodontic microsurgery

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

periapical surgery

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

In conventional bur group, the periapical surgery will be performed using rotary burs.

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

periapical surgery

In piezo group, the periapical surgery will be performed using piezoelectric device.

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

periapical surgery

In conventional bur group, the periapical surgery will be performed using rotary burs.

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* • Consenting adults (age range: 18-60 years)

* Non-contributory medical history (ASA Class I or Class 2)
* Participants with symptomatic/persistent apical periodontitis showing clinical signs and symptoms and evidence of periapical lesion of strictly endodontic origin with minimum lesion diameter of 5mm on periapical radiography (PR).
* Radiographic evidence of an intact buccal cortical plate on cone-beam computed tomographic (CBCT) imaging with minimum thickness of 1mm.

Exclusion Criteria

* Patients with systemic diseases (diabetes mellitus, uncontrolled hypertension, hepatic/renal disease, or systemic bleeding disorders), pregnancy, smoking
* Patients on anticoagulant/ antiplatelet drugs
* Teeth that were unrestorable, fractured/perforated teeth,
* Teeth with endodontic-periodontal communication and
* Teeth with deep pockets (probing depth \>4 mm)
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

60 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Postgraduate Institute of Dental Sciences Rohtak

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Sanjay Tewari

principal investigator

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Post Graduate Institute of Dental Sciences

Rohtak, Haryana, India

Site Status RECRUITING

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

India

Central Contacts

Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.

sanjay tewari, MDS conservative dentistry 941

Role: CONTACT

9416259534

Facility Contacts

Find local site contact details for specific facilities participating in the trial.

Sanjay Tewari, MDS

Role: primary

9416259534

keerthana G, MDS

Role: backup

9789502701

sanjay Tewari, MDS

Role: backup

keerthana G, MDS

Role: backup

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

keerthana

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.