Outcome of Bone Window Approach in Endodontic Microsurgery Using Novel Piezoelectric Device
NCT ID: NCT06587048
Last Updated: 2024-09-19
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
RECRUITING
NA
40 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2023-09-01
2025-05-01
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Healing After Endodontic Microsurgery Using a Rotary Bur Versus Piezoelectric Unit for Osteotomy and Root Resection
NCT07197658
Effect of Piezoelectric Device on Intraoperative Hemorrhage Control and Quality of Life
NCT06240182
Effect of Piezoelectric Surgery on Quality of Life and Periradicular Healing After Endodontic Surgery
NCT04358887
Effect of Different Instrumentation Technique on Endodontic Outcome
NCT03278054
PRF and Bone Graft in Endodontic Surgeries
NCT04377698
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
A novel and minimally invasive procedure called the bone window approach to the apical region aims to preserve more bony structure and the structural integrity of the healthy cortical plate. The bone window also functions as autologous graft material, which has been recognized as the gold standard for regeneration without the need for additional substitute materials (7,8). For obtaining bone window, use of traditional burs in combination with chisels, reciprocating or oscillating saws and lasers have been reported in literature. Piezoelectric bone surgery is an innovative technology that has gained popularity in recent years. It makes use of thin osteotomy instruments that enable selective hard tissue cutting while safeguarding soft tissues (9). This technique is not only clinically effective, but histological and histomorphometric evidence of wound healing and bone formation in experimental animal models has shown that tissue response is better in piezo surgery than in conventional bone-cutting techniques such as diamond or carbide rotary instruments (10-12).
In cases of large periapical lesions where the buccal cortical plate is intact, the application of the piezoelectric device has recently been reported in case reports to create a bony window on buccal bone (13, 14). In a recent randomized trial (15), piezo surgery was compared to traditional microsurgery to assess haemorrhage control and patient postoperative quality of life. In a recent randomized trial (16) comparing bone lid technique over traditional technique in the surgical management of mandibular lesions, the bone lid technique using a piezoelectric device was found to be safe and effective for treating lesions in the posterior mandibular region and was associated with less postoperative complications. The bone lid approach has been used in the literature on oral and maxillofacial surgery for a number of procedures, including root-end surgery, cystic enucleation, impacted tooth extraction, implant explantation, and access to the maxillary sinus for the removal of cysts or foreign bodies. The review concluded that the included clinical studies were of low quality evidence, and that randomized clinical trials were necessary to compare the effectiveness of the bone lid technique to other methods. Furthermore, the best cutting tool for fashioning bone lids has not yet been identified (17).
The transition of endodontic diagnosis and treatment planning from two dimensions to three dimensions is facilitated by CBCT scanning, which also shows the location of anatomical structures in three dimensions, provides precise measurements in depth and length, and enhances localization of the periapical lesion (18, 19). Furthermore, CBCT imaging has high sensitivity to detect the presence of a bony defect in the cortical plate and precisely measure its thickness (20, 21, 22).
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
TREATMENT
SINGLE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Piezo group
The bone window osteotomy will be created with a piezoelectric device during endodontic microsurgery
periapical surgery
In piezo group, the periapical surgery will be performed using piezoelectric device.
conventional bur group
The bone window osteotomy will be created with a conventional rotary burs in slow-speed handpiece during endodontic microsurgery
periapical surgery
In conventional bur group, the periapical surgery will be performed using rotary burs.
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
periapical surgery
In piezo group, the periapical surgery will be performed using piezoelectric device.
periapical surgery
In conventional bur group, the periapical surgery will be performed using rotary burs.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* Non-contributory medical history (ASA Class I or Class 2)
* Participants with symptomatic/persistent apical periodontitis showing clinical signs and symptoms and evidence of periapical lesion of strictly endodontic origin with minimum lesion diameter of 5mm on periapical radiography (PR).
* Radiographic evidence of an intact buccal cortical plate on cone-beam computed tomographic (CBCT) imaging with minimum thickness of 1mm.
Exclusion Criteria
* Patients on anticoagulant/ antiplatelet drugs
* Teeth that were unrestorable, fractured/perforated teeth,
* Teeth with endodontic-periodontal communication and
* Teeth with deep pockets (probing depth \>4 mm)
18 Years
60 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Postgraduate Institute of Dental Sciences Rohtak
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Sanjay Tewari
principal investigator
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Post Graduate Institute of Dental Sciences
Rohtak, Haryana, India
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Central Contacts
Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.
Facility Contacts
Find local site contact details for specific facilities participating in the trial.
sanjay Tewari, MDS
Role: backup
keerthana G, MDS
Role: backup
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
keerthana
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.