Influence of Maintaining Apical Patency on Post-Endodontic Pain in Molars

NCT ID: NCT07239752

Last Updated: 2025-11-20

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

NOT_YET_RECRUITING

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

48 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2026-02-10

Study Completion Date

2026-10-10

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

This randomized controlled trial will investigate if maintaining apical patency-a technique where a small file is gently moved past the root's end during cleaning-affects pain after a root canal. The study will include 48 adult patients needing root canal treatment on a back molar tooth with a dead nerve and infection at the root tip. Participants will be randomly assigned to one of two groups: one where the apical patency technique is used, and one where it is not. All other treatment steps will be identical. Patients will record their pain levels on a standard scale (0-100 mm Visual Analog Scale) at 6, 12, 24, 48, and 72 hours after the procedure. The goal is to determine if this specific technique influences the intensity and duration of post-treatment pain

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

BACKGROUND: Post-operative pain remains a significant challenge in endodontics, impacting patient satisfaction. The clinical practice of maintaining apical patency-passively keeping the apical foramen patent with a small file-is debated, with conflicting evidence on its impact on post-endodontic pain. This study aims to provide clear evidence from a robust randomized controlled trial.

OBJECTIVE: To determine the influence of maintaining apical patency on the intensity and duration of post-endodontic pain in molars with necrotic pulp and apical periodontitis.

METHODS:

Study Design: Single-center, randomized, controlled, parallel-group trial.

Setting: Department of Operative Dentistry, Saidu College of Dentistry, Swat.

Participants: 48 adult patients (aged 18-65, ASA I/II) with a single permanent molar diagnosed with necrotic pulp and symptomatic apical periodontitis. Patients with prior endodontic treatment, complex anatomy, systemic illness, pregnancy, recent analgesic use, or non-restorable teeth will be excluded.

Intervention:

Patency Group (Experimental): Following determination of working length with an electronic apex locator (verified radiographically), a pre-curved size #10 K-file will be passively advanced 1.0 mm beyond the major apical foramen before and after each successive instrumentation size.

Non-Patency Group (Active Comparator): Instrumentation will be carefully confined to the root canal space and will not proceed beyond the apical foramen.

Procedure: All participants will receive single-visit root canal treatment under local anesthesia and rubber dam isolation. Cleaning and shaping will be performed using a rotary instrument system. Irrigation will be performed with sodium hypochlorite and EDTA. Obturation will be completed with gutta-percha and sealer via a standardized technique, followed by a composite restoration.

Outcome Measure: The primary outcome is post-operative pain intensity, measured using a 100-mm Visual Analog Scale (VAS). Patients will self-record their pain levels at 6, 12, 24, 48, and 72 hours post-operatively.

Data Analysis: Data will be analyzed using SPSS Statistics v25. Descriptive statistics will summarize the data. The distribution of pain severity categories will be compared using the Chi-square test. Mean VAS scores between groups will be compared using independent samples t-tests (assuming normal distribution). A p-value of \< 0.05 will be considered statistically significant.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Periapical Periodontitis Dental Pulp Necrosis

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

TRIPLE

Participants Caregivers Investigators

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Patency Group

: A #10 K-file is passively advanced 1.0 mm beyond the major apical foramen before and after each successive instrumentation size to maintain patency.

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Patency Group

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

The procedural technique of passively advancing a small endodontic file (size #10 K-file) 1 mm beyond the apical foramen before and after each larger instrument during root canal cleaning and shaping. This is done to prevent blockage of the apical portion of the canal.

Standard Root Canal Instrumentation

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Root canal instrumentation that is strictly confined to the canal space, terminating at the apical constriction (working length) and avoiding any instrumentation beyond the apical foramen.

Non-Patency Group

Participants in this group will receive standard root canal treatment where instruments are carefully confined to the root canal space and do not proceed beyond the apical foramen. All other aspects of the treatment are identical to the Experimental arm.

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Patency Group

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

The procedural technique of passively advancing a small endodontic file (size #10 K-file) 1 mm beyond the apical foramen before and after each larger instrument during root canal cleaning and shaping. This is done to prevent blockage of the apical portion of the canal.

Standard Root Canal Instrumentation

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Root canal instrumentation that is strictly confined to the canal space, terminating at the apical constriction (working length) and avoiding any instrumentation beyond the apical foramen.

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Patency Group

The procedural technique of passively advancing a small endodontic file (size #10 K-file) 1 mm beyond the apical foramen before and after each larger instrument during root canal cleaning and shaping. This is done to prevent blockage of the apical portion of the canal.

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Standard Root Canal Instrumentation

Root canal instrumentation that is strictly confined to the canal space, terminating at the apical constriction (working length) and avoiding any instrumentation beyond the apical foramen.

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

Medically healthy, classified as American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) Physical Status I or II.

Presence of a single permanent molar tooth diagnosed with necrotic pulp and symptomatic apical periodontitis, and indicated for primary root canal treatment.

Patients who provide informed written consent to participate in the study. -

Exclusion Criteria

Teeth with prior endodontic treatment or complex anatomy (e.g., calcified canals, severe curvature).

Patients with significant systemic illness (e.g., uncontrolled diabetes, immunocompromised status) or pregnancy.

History of analgesic intake within 72 hours prior to the root canal procedure.

Non-restorable teeth, teeth with severe periodontal disease (pocket depth \>5mm), or teeth with root fractures.


\-
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

65 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

College of Physicians and Surgeons Pakistan

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Faiz ur rahman

post graduate trainee

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Central Contacts

Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.

Faiz Rahman, BDS

Role: CONTACT

+923451505838

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

SCD-Endo-Patency-001

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

Apical Patency and Postoperative Pain.
NCT02768285 COMPLETED PHASE1