Efficacy and Safety of 3 Doses of HL10 Given at Fixed Time Intervals Compared to Standard Therapy

NCT ID: NCT00742482

Last Updated: 2025-02-24

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

TERMINATED

Clinical Phase

PHASE3

Total Enrollment

418 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2003-01-31

Study Completion Date

2005-06-30

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

The purpose of the study is to evaluate the efficacy and safety of three doses of HL 10 given at fixed time intervals compared to standard therapy

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Acute Lung Injury Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

NONE

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

HL 10

Freeze dried HL 10

Intervention Type DRUG

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Patients intubated and on mechanical ventilation
* Patients with Acute Lung Injury defined as (a, b, c and d are all applicable): a: PaO2/FiO2 \< or equal to 300 mmHg (40.0 kPa) (regardless of PEEP level), b: Acute onset, c: Pulmonary artery wedge pressure \< or equal to 18 mmHg when measured or no clinical evidence of left atrial hypertension, d: Bilateral infiltrates seen on frontal chest radiograph
* Less than 60 hours from onset of the present period of mechanical ventilation to 1st instillation
* Expected to continue on mechanical ventilation for more than 24 hours
* 18 years of age or older
* Following receipt of verbal and written information about the trial, the patient or legally acceptable representative must provide signed and dated informed consent before any trial related activity is carried out

Exclusion Criteria

* Current diagnosis of acute bronchial asthma attack
* History of or clinical suspicion of lung fibrosis
* Current diagnosis of suspected pulmonary thrombo-embolism
* Patients on daily medication for chronic obstructive pulmonary disease at time of admission to ICU
* Patients who have received mechanical ventilation for more than 48 hours continuously within 1 month prior to the present period of mechanical ventilation
* Patients with pneumonectomy or lobectomy
* Patients with untreated pneumothorax at time of instillation
* Patients having tracheostomy at time of instillation
* Patients who have had surgical procedures under general anaesthesia performed within 6 hours prior to inclusion blood gas sample
* Patients having mean arterial blood pressure \< 50 mmHg in spite of adequate fluid administration and/or vasoactive drugs at time of instillation
* Patients having PaO2 \< 75 mmHg with a FiO2 = 1.0 not responding to adjustment of PEEP at time of instillation
* Glasgow Coma Score \< or equal to 10 before sedation or major findings on CT/MR scan of the head such as: brain oedema, acute space occupying lesion, other acute lesions with bleeding or mass effect (patients with minor lesion which do not require further diagnostics or monitoring can be included)
* Patients with life expectancy less than 3 months due to primary disease assessed by the attending physician (e.g., end-stage cancer, AIDS or generally poor health)
* Known or suspected hypersensitivity to constituents(s) of the investigational product
* Patients who have received treatment with any investigational drug within the previous 4 weeks
* Current participation in any other interventional clinical trial until day 29 of the trial
* Patients previously randomised in this trial
* Patients known or suspected of not being able to comply with a study protocol (e.g., due to alcoholism, drug dependency or psychotic state)
* Females of childbearing potential who have a positive pregnancy test or who are breast feeding
* Patients suffering from highly infectious diseases where trial related procedures could pose a safety risk for the staff (e.g., SARS)
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

LEO Pharma

INDUSTRY

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

LEO Pharma A/S

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Jozef Kesecioglu, MD, PhD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Anaesthesist-Intensivist, Department of Intensive Care Medicine

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Allgemeines Krankenhaus, Klinik für Anästhesie un Allgemeine Intensivmedizin

Vienna, , Austria

Site Status

Erasme University Hospital

Brussels, , Belgium

Site Status

Mount Sinai Hospital, Critical Care Unit

Toronto, Ontario, Canada

Site Status

Odense University Hospital

Odense C, , Denmark

Site Status

Kuopio University Hospital, Intensive Care Unit

Kuopio, , Finland

Site Status

Hôpital Pitié Salpétrière, Département d'Anesthésie Réanimation

Paris, , France

Site Status

Klinik für Anästhesiologie der RWTH Aachen

Aachen, , Germany

Site Status

Academisch Medisch Centrum

Amsterdam, , Netherlands

Site Status

Department of Intensive Care Medicine

Utrecht, , Netherlands

Site Status

Ullevål University Hospital, INtensive Care Department

Oslo, , Norway

Site Status

Consorci Hospitalari Parc Taulí

Sabadell (Barcelona), , Spain

Site Status

University Hospital of Lund, Department of Intensive Care

Lund, , Sweden

Site Status

St Thomas Hospital, Adult Intensive Care

London, , United Kingdom

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Austria Belgium Canada Denmark Finland France Germany Netherlands Norway Spain Sweden United Kingdom

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Lu Q, Zhang M, Girardi C, Bouhemad B, Kesecioglu J, Rouby JJ. Computed tomography assessment of exogenous surfactant-induced lung reaeration in patients with acute lung injury. Crit Care. 2010;14(4):R135. doi: 10.1186/cc9186. Epub 2010 Jul 15.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 20633284 (View on PubMed)

Kesecioglu J, Beale R, Stewart TE, Findlay GP, Rouby JJ, Holzapfel L, Bruins P, Steenken EJ, Jeppesen OK, Lachmann B. Exogenous natural surfactant for treatment of acute lung injury and the acute respiratory distress syndrome. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2009 Nov 15;180(10):989-94. doi: 10.1164/rccm.200812-1955OC. Epub 2009 Aug 27.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 19713451 (View on PubMed)

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

HL 0101 INT

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

Impact of PEEP Trials on Ventilation-Perfusion Matching in ARDS Patients
NCT06823804 ENROLLING_BY_INVITATION PHASE2/PHASE3